Madden NFL 11 News Post

Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed

06:58 PM - June 4, 2010 by Steve_OS

Gamespot has posted the Madden NFL 11 team ratings. Let your complaints be heard, LOL.

Quote:


	AFC EAST New York Jets 89 New England 86 Miami 78 Buffalo 67 AFC NORTH Baltimore 90 Cincinnati 86 Pittsburgh 84 Cleveland 70 AFC SOUTH Indianapolis 91 Houston 78 Tennessee 77 Jacksonville 74 AFC WEST San Diego 85 Denver 78 Kansas City 71 Oakland 71 NFC EAST Dallas 87 New York Giants 81 Philadelphia 80 Washington 76 NFC NORTH Minnesota 88 Green Bay 87 Chicago 77 Detroit 68 NFC SOUTH New Orleans 92 Atlanta 83 Carolina 75 Tampa Bay 69 NFC WEST Arizona 79 San Francisco 79 Seattle 75 St. Louis 66

*UPDATE: Gamespot just added their video interview with Madden NFL 11 designer and ratings czar Donny Moore.

Game: Madden NFL 11Reader Score: 6/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Xbox 360Votes for game: 96 - View All

Madden NFL 11 Videos

Member Comments

# 141 Omnicronos78 @ 06/06/10 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve_OS


	Just looking at the #'s... Cards -8 and Eagles -6 took the biggest hit. Skins at +6 the obvious winners.

The winners and losers are kind of misleading when you compare these to the original Madden 10 ratings:

Quote:


	New England Patriots 93 Pittsburgh Steelers 92 New York Giants 89 Philadelphia Eagles 88 San Diego Chargers 88 Tennessee Titans 87 Indianapolis Colts 87 Arizona Cardinals 86 Dallas Cowboys 85 Carolina Panthers 83 Baltimore Ravens 82 Atlanta Falcons 81 Minnesota Vikings 80 Washington Redskins 79 Chicago Bears 79 Buffalo Bills 78 New York Jets 78 Green Bay Packers 78 Seattle Seahawks 77 Miami Dolphins 77 Houston Texans 75 New Orleans Saints 74 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 74 San Francisco 49ers 73 Jacksonville Jaguars 71 Oakland Raiders 71 Denver Broncos 70 Kansas City Chiefs 69 Cleveland Browns 68 Cincinnati Bengals 67 St. Louis Rams 66 Detroit Lions 65

# 142 TCUFan96 @ 06/06/10 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bodymore


	Nobody messing with us!!!! Ravens baby!......(waits for the bandwagon users)

w00t ravens! Ok but really i like all the ratings they seem realistic.

# 143 beefjohnson @ 06/06/10 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeAreAllWitnesses


	Wait. Stop bashing Jake Delhomme. Jake clearly should be 85-87 overall. He's one of the top Quarterbacks in the NFL. And no, I'm not a homer. I can prove it with a video of all the Panthers stuff I have in my basement if you'd like.

Jake "Interceptions" Delhomme. He was a good qb back in the day, I will say, but the past couple seasons hasn't been the greatest. Time to move on seeing how the guy isn't getting any younger. Also...take a look at your "footage" and see how many of those amazing passes were to Smith...a majority I would say.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gosens6


	That's like saying Trent Dilfer took the Ravens to the Superbowl when it was clearly the defense and the running game.

Indeed. I don't get ppl who say "THIS guy took so an so to the super bowl".
I guess the other guys were not on the field. People forget Carolina had an amazing defense that year, and an awesome running game to go with it. But nah, it was all Jake. Funny how receivers people thought were slacking off kinda showed up and made some plays when Moore stepped in. They were actually getting looked at instead of Smith being the intended target ever single play. Smith bailed Delhomme out numerous times in ways that not many receivers have the ability to do.

But hey..this isnt a bash "this guy" thread. I just think with the play that the team showed towards the end of the year when Delhomme wasn't playing was obviously better than what it was. Ofcourse the D stepped up as well towards the end. around 79 I think would be fair for Carolina

# 144 ctindal21 @ 06/06/10 06:53 PM

saints are 4 higher than the vikes, im not a viking fan but this is ridiculous...

# 145 Bengals28 @ 06/06/10 07:02 PM

Bengals will do work.

# 146 nyj721 @ 06/06/10 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ElijahThePatsFan


	Only? It's higher than quite a few teams. Although I question how the Bengals and Jets are higher rated than them...

We beat the in the playoffs on their home field.

# 147 nyj721 @ 06/06/10 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bolt4Life

You guys play the Raiders twice a year as well as the Chiefs so your secondary gets 4 games off.

# 148 Bellsprout @ 06/06/10 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beefjohnson


	Jake "Interceptions" Delhomme. He was a good qb back in the day, I will say, but the past couple seasons hasn't been the greatest. Time to move on seeing how the guy isn't getting any younger. Also...take a look at your "footage" and see how many of those amazing passes were to Smith...a majority I would say.

Your required forum research for the day:
http://www.operationsports.com/forum...light=delhomme

Enjoy.

# 149 RayAllen20 @ 06/06/10 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeAreAllWitnesses


	Your required forum research for the day: http://www.operationsports.com/forum...light=delhomme Enjoy.

Has to be the greatest thread I've ever read. And with Delhomme now on the Browns, how are they possibly rated super low? They might go 0-16, but Delhomme will somehow win the Super Bowl with them. Guaranteed.

# 150 Steve_OS @ 06/06/10 08:02 PM

From Sportsgrid.

http://www.sportsgrid.com/nfl/madden-11-ratings/

Quote:


	No surprises at the tippy top: the New Orleans Saints and the Indianapolis Colts are 1 and 2, respectively. After that, we get confirmation on something we long figured: the Baltimore Ravens and New York Jets are shaping up to be the sexy picks of the 2010 season. The Ravens in particular are a surprise. Ranked number 8 in TPVR ratings, the Madden programmers believe the Ravens have the 3rd-most talented roster in football. This rating is likely a result of the projected development of Ray Rice (4th overall in Rotowire's PVR rating) and Joe Flacco (88th), as well as the acquisition of Anquan Boldin (33rd).

# 151 Matt Diesel @ 06/06/10 10:52 PM

Real World Performance 2008-2009 season vs Madden 09 ratings, for comparison:

Patriots 97 (11-5)
Cowboys 96 (9-7)
Chargers 95 (8-8)
Colts 95 (12-4)
Giants 94 (12-4)
Steelers 94 (12-4)
Jaguars 93 (5-11)
Packers 91 (6-10)
Patriots 97 (11-5)
Cowboys 96 (9-7)
Chargers 95 (8-8)
Colts 95 (12-4)
Giants 94 (12-4)
Steelers 94 (12-4)
Jaguars 93 (5-11)
Packers 91 (6-10)
Eagles 91 (9-6-1)
Bucs 91 (9-7)
Vikings 90 (10-6)
Browns 88 (4-12)
Redskins 88 (8-8)
Seahawks 87 (4-12)
Saints 87 (8-8)
Panthers 86 (12-4)
Broncos 84 (8-8)
Titans 84 (13-3)
Bills 82 (7-9)
Ravens 81 (11-5)
Bengals 80 (4-11-1)
Bears 80 (9-7)
Cardinals 78 (9-7)
Texans 78 (8-8)
Lions 78 (0-16)
Rams 77 (2-14)
Jets 76 (9-7)
49ers 72 (7-9)
Chiefs 71 (2-14)
Raiders 71 (5-11)
Falcons 67 (11-5)
Dolphins 67 (11-5)

# 152 seriousluboy83 @ 06/06/10 11:54 PM

Does anyone beside me think the Raider should also be in the 60's

# 153 KaptnKirk12 @ 06/07/10 02:02 AM

I really fail to see how Oakland is just as good as Kansas City.

Chiefs have easily taken a pretty big step forward improving their extremely young team, while Oakland probably got worse lol.

Luckily updated rosters and everything change this as the season goes on.

# 154 TomBrady @ 06/07/10 06:09 AM

Quote:


	Chiefs have easily taken a pretty big step forward improving their extremely young team, while Oakland probably got worse lol.

Roflcopter.
They've added a good QB, had a great draft, and generally got better in allmost every positioon.

# 155 jdmsi7 @ 06/07/10 08:45 AM

goood it'll be nice to beat them over and over again

# 156 theD25 @ 06/07/10 09:29 AM

I would say the Lions should be in the 70's with their offseason additions, but lets be serious. They are still and will always be the stumbling mumbling bumbling Detroit Lions.

# 157 JBH3 @ 06/07/10 10:15 AM

Aren't these completely cosmetic though?

# 158 Skyliner80 @ 06/07/10 11:03 AM

NYJ 89. psh. I guarantee that next year it will not be that high.

# 159 JBH3 @ 06/07/10 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joejccva71


	They are averaged out based on player ratings but still with that being said, how are the Colts only 1 point ahead of the Ravens? I don't see it. I think about who the Ravens have on their team, and then think about the Colts and then I get all confused.

Does EA offer any insight into how they are formulated? Like if the Colts are only 1 pt higher are certain ratings weighted? i.e. defense... w/ more defensive playmakers on BAL maybe the d-players have ratings that are weighted which increase their overall...?

It would be nice if they told us exactly how they calculate these ratings.

# 160 SuperChargers @ 06/07/10 11:22 AM

AFC West is messed up. the Chargers boast a better record than last year and drop 4 overall points? What!? sure we lost LT and Cromartie but they weren't the main focus of offense or defense. KC is rated a little high but it doesnt matter. i think the Raiders should be up a point or 2 and denver also.

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 789 10 Next »

More Links

Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed