Madden NFL 11 News Post

Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed

07:58 PM - June 4, 2010 by Steve_OS

Gamespot has posted the Madden NFL 11 team ratings. Let your complaints be heard, LOL.

Quote:


	AFC EAST New York Jets 89 New England 86 Miami 78 Buffalo 67 AFC NORTH Baltimore 90 Cincinnati 86 Pittsburgh 84 Cleveland 70 AFC SOUTH Indianapolis 91 Houston 78 Tennessee 77 Jacksonville 74 AFC WEST San Diego 85 Denver 78 Kansas City 71 Oakland 71 NFC EAST Dallas 87 New York Giants 81 Philadelphia 80 Washington 76 NFC NORTH Minnesota 88 Green Bay 87 Chicago 77 Detroit 68 NFC SOUTH New Orleans 92 Atlanta 83 Carolina 75 Tampa Bay 69 NFC WEST Arizona 79 San Francisco 79 Seattle 75 St. Louis 66

*UPDATE: Gamespot just added their video interview with Madden NFL 11 designer and ratings czar Donny Moore.

Game: Madden NFL 11Reader Score: 6/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Xbox 360Votes for game: 96 - View All

Madden NFL 11 Videos

Member Comments

# 121 raz77 @ 06/06/10 12:21 AM

Wonderful

# 122 cima @ 06/06/10 01:19 AM

Not enough love for the AFC North champions, but that's ok. Last year ranked #4 defense that will only be better is now going to have an offense resembling the 2005 Bengals..look out NFL!

# 123 bkrich83 @ 06/06/10 01:57 AM

I love these threads. Everyone's favorite team is underrated.

# 124 Gosens6 @ 06/06/10 02:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkrich83


	I love these threads. Everyone's favorite team is underrated.

How right you are. They are always good for a nice laugh though.

# 125 jmood88 @ 06/06/10 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bkrich83


	I love these threads. Everyone's favorite team is underrated.

The Saints should be 99 overall!!!!!!!!!!!

# 126 bkrich83 @ 06/06/10 03:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ibe3zy


	Thank you, Ravens getting recognized finally! If they had kept the same ******* ratings and overlooked the super improvements we've made i wouldve shot myself.*

Exhibit A from my previous post.

# 127 beefjohnson @ 06/06/10 07:44 AM

the fact that Delhomme is no longer with Carolina should automatically make them around 79-81. You have to admit, it was a totally different team with Moore.

# 128 PanthersFanboy @ 06/06/10 10:30 AM

Panthers at 75. Jake is gone, if anything that should have gave us points and our D is still good even though we lost JP. We should be a solid 80 IMO.

# 129 Bellsprout @ 06/06/10 11:03 AM

Wait. Stop bashing Jake Delhomme. Jake clearly should be 85-87 overall. He's one of the top Quarterbacks in the NFL.

And no, I'm not a homer. I can prove it with a video of all the Panthers stuff I have in my basement if you'd like.

# 130 soldierAB @ 06/06/10 11:39 AM

i have questions

# 131 woaty13ward @ 06/06/10 12:13 PM

Geaux Saints Geaux !!!!!!

# 132 ForUntoOblivionSoar∞ @ 06/06/10 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGaither84


	It might be... with Favre they deserve to be in the 91-92 range with the Saints and Colts. Is favre worth those extra 3-4 points for the entire team? Yeah, I think so. Should they be an 88 without Favre? Now that is a good question. Not likely. Not with T-Jack at QB.

I agree. With Favre the Vikings are among the top 3 teams in the league. Actualy, I think they are better than the Colts, and maybe the best in football- assuming Favre plays well.

# 133 deaduck @ 06/06/10 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cubsball899


	77 is about right IMO for the bears... cutler really isn't that good, the best receiver is devin aromashodu not devin hester and i think DA will turn a lot of heads this year but still... hopefully forte will bounce back from a terribly disappointing year last season. the defense is falling fast lol, i find it funny how people are saying with urlacher back this year the defense will be better, its the same thing i heard people saying last year lol urlacher is made of glass and will be hurt within a few games. briggs is still a top OLB but thats about it and peppers is aging fast really won't be much of a factor (nice of the front office to tie up like 6 years in him ithink lol) tillman at this point in his career would be lucky to be a good teams third corner and he's the bears best corner lol... he's very good and i love him but he doesn't have the speed to stick with anyone anymore. bears offense will have to carry them to a .500 season and IMO they are rated properly for that in madden.

I get some of what you're saying but even as a guy who feels uncomfortable watching the Bears try and become a offensive team...I still think it's too early to give up on Cutler. He had some really nice throws in between all those INTs. He's got the physical gifts...just has to get the head straight.

# 134 bkrich83 @ 06/06/10 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WeAreAllWitnesses


	Wait. Stop bashing Jake Delhomme. Jake clearly should be 85-87 overall. He's one of the top Quarterbacks in the NFL. And no, I'm not a homer. I can prove it with a video of all the Panthers stuff I have in my basement if you'd like.

I miss that guy. And for all you who don't know what he's talking about.

Donny Moore is on my bad side.

# 135 Gosens6 @ 06/06/10 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trademarq


	i don't see how ppl can ids Jake when he toke them to the Super Bowl

That's like saying Trent Dilfer took the Ravens to the Superbowl when it was clearly the defense and the running game.

# 136 Gosens6 @ 06/06/10 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trademarq


	ok so Dilfer 1502 yards ... Jake Del. 3219 yards ... and one having the 1st ranked def and the other having the 10th is the same ...

It's clearly not the same. I thought you would get my point though.

# 137 jmood88 @ 06/06/10 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trademarq


	ok so Dilfer 1502 yards ... Jake Del. 3219 yards ... and one having the 1st ranked def and the other having the 10th is the same ...

Delhomme also had 22 turnovers and 19 touchdowns. Dilfer only started 8 games that year but only threw 7 less touchdowns. They weren't exactly the same but both were average at best quarterbacks who were backed by a great defense, which in Delhomme's case, bailed him out many times after his turnovers.

# 138 Gosens6 @ 06/06/10 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmood88


	Delhomme also had 22 turnovers and 19 touchdowns. Dilfer only started 8 games that year but only threw 7 less touchdowns. They weren't exactly the same but both were average at best quarterbacks who were backed by a great defense, which in Delhomme's case, bailed him out many times after his turnovers.

Thank you for the translation. Exactly what I was getting at

# 139 Gosens6 @ 06/06/10 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trademarq


	naw i get u but im saying it wasn't jus the def ... he was actually good .. and now that he had a horrible playoff game an a WAY BELOW average season he's the biggest bum .. but Jay Cutler can throw 99 ints and never have a winning season an he's still a "Franchise QB" ...

Well it wasn't just a horrible playoff game. It was a horrible season overall.

I for one think Jay Cutler CAN be good if he gets his head on strait. He's such a loose cannon right now I wouldn't want him on my team.

# 140 Gosens6 @ 06/06/10 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trademarq


	ok maybe it was a horrible season ... leave jake alone ..

Hahaha alright man i'll get off his back. After all who knows, Cleveland could resurrect his career.

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 Next »

More Links

Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed