Madden NFL 11 Team Ratings Revealed

[JBH3]

Quote: Originally Posted by joejccva71

They are averaged out based on player ratings but still with that being said, how are the Colts only 1 point ahead of the Ravens? I don't see it. I think about who the Ravens have on their team, and then think about the Colts and then I get all confused.

Does EA offer any insight into how they are formulated? Like if the Colts are only 1 pt higher are certain ratings weighted? i.e. defense... w/ more defensive playmakers on BAL maybe the d-players have ratings that are weighted which increase their overall...?

It would be nice if they told us exactly how they calculate these ratings.

[SuperChargers]

AFC West is messed up. the Chargers boast a better record than last year and drop 4 overall points? What!? sure we lost LT and Cromartie but they weren't the main focus of offense or defense. KC is rated a little high but it doesnt matter. i think the Raiders should be up a point or 2 and denver also.

[SuperChargers]

AFC West is messed up. the Chargers boast a better record than last year and drop 4 overall points? What!? sure we lost LT and Cromartie but they weren't the main focus of offense or defense. KC is rated a little high but it doesnt matter. i think the Raiders should be up a point or 2 and denver also.

[WildFireXXI]

Quote: Originally Posted by joejccva71

Donny how in the world are you going to give the Baltimore Ravens a 90, but the Colts a 91? Seriously? Sorry but the Colts are alot better than the Ravens. It's not even a close measure. The Ravens have a defense thats as old as the stone age, a WR core that is mediocre at best, and a QB that still hasn't proved he can focus, maintain, and win games. I wouldn't even call Flacco a leader yet. The only thing the Ravens have going for them is their RB core. But they get a 90? An 85 would have been generous.

Ahaha, yeah, the "stone age" defense that ranked 3rd in the NFL, a defensive line that shut down Freeney and Mathis and 2 WRs on the rosters that are constantly reliable for 70 catches, 1000 yards and 5tds and a QB who increased his rookie year stats by 600 yards and 7 TDs with only 2 people to throw to now has a ton of guys to throw to.

[joejccva71]

Quote: Originally Posted by WildFireXXI

Ahaha, yeah, the "stone age" defense that ranked 3rd in the NFL, a defensive line that shut down Freeney and Mathis and 2 WRs on the rosters that are constantly reliable for 70 catches, 1000 yards and 5tds and a QB who increased his rookie year stats by 600 yards and 7 TDs with only 2 people to throw to now has a ton of guys to throw to.

5 TD's from WR's impresses you? And I didn't say the Ravens were horrible...I just don't think they are a 90 rated team, and I definately don't think the Colts are only 1 point better. They are way better.

[WildFireXXI]

Quote: Originally Posted by joejccva71

5 TD's from WR's impresses you? And I didn't say the Ravens were horrible...I just don't think they are a 90 rated team, and I definately don't think the Colts are only 1 point better. They are way better.

5 is average. I said GUARANTEED. There's not many recievers in the NFL that you can always rely on for 70 catches, 1000 yards and atleast 5 TDs. Ravens have 2.

And the Colts OFFENSE is better if not for Peyton alone, the defense is not. Colts had the 18th ranked defense in the league and even ranked 24th in rush defense. Now, if the Colts had a top 5 defense THEN they'd be alot higher.

[stlrell]

Go Rams!!! I will enjoy proving people wrong again this year!!



"We Are who they thought we where!!"

[CardsFan52]

It gets me every time.