Madden NFL 15 News Post

Madden NFL 15 Video - Simulated Season Stats

11:08 AM - August 16, 2014 by Steve_OS

Our friends at ESG have posted this Madden NFL 15 video that shows end of season stats, league leaders, awards, division standings, and more. They also simmed the playoffs and Super Bowl.

For those of you interested in simulated stats, check out the results and leave your thoughts.

Game: Madden NFL 15Reader Score: 6.5/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / PS4 / Xbox 360 / Xbox OneVotes for game: 42 - View All

Madden NFL 15 Videos

Member Comments

# 261 extremeskins04 @ 08/22/14 04:34 PM

I mean at this point, it's affecting progression/regression of the game. If the QB's confidence level affects how well they play which in turn probably means goals aren't met, you could have a very good QB like Matt Stafford or Andrew Luck be at like 60-70 OVR after 3-5 seasons.

That breaks CFM beyond belief. It's not even worth building a franchise if this is the case. The game would be nothing more than a "play now" or "online" type of game, which unfortunately is fine for some people.

CFM offliner's probably just won't buy the game until it's fixed.

Honestly I'd rather have the stat sim engine and progression/regression work correctly way more than a presentation package. They can ditch the presentation, just give me realistic stats and I'm good.

# 262 fancyclaps @ 08/22/14 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamehead


	Holding out on test results via supersim on 6 minute qtrs.

Just super simmed 3 games. 7 min QTRs, all pro, no slider adjustment, injuries OFF. Results:

Jaguars - 26 @ Eagles - 19

Foles: 21/38 - 221 yds - 0td 2int -55% - 5.8 ypa
Bortles: 26/41 - 202 yds - 0td 0int - 63% - 4.9 ypa

Gerhart: 22 - 87 - 1 TD
McCoy: 17 - 128 - 1 TD

(Jax had 41 total carries - Bortles 6 for 0 yards)
(Phi had 27 total carries - Foles 7 for -5 yards)

no sacks for either team

Indy - 24 @ Denver - 29

Peyotn: 34/48 - 281 yds - 2td 0int - 70% - 5.8 ypa
Luck: 22/38 - 244 yds - 2td 0int - 57% - 6.4 ypa

Ball: 17 - 72 1TD
Bradshaw: 13 - 96 1 TD

(Den 25 total carries, Peyton 4 for 9 yards)
(Indy 24 total carries, Luck 5 for 12)

***Trent Richardson had 6 attempts for 16 yards, the most accurate statistic yet!!

2 sacks by Denver (Knighton and Thomas)

Buffalo - 24 @ Chicago - 31

Cutler: 23/33 - 265 yds - 2td 1int - 69% - 8 ypa
Manuel: 22/38 - 198 yds - 1td 1int - 57% - 5.2 ypa

Forte: 13 - 86 - 2 td
Spiller: 15 - 80 - 1 td
Jackson: 16 - 70 - 1 td

(Chicago 23 total carries - Cutler 4 for 2 yards)
(Buffalo 37 total carries - Manuel 7 for 19 yards)

1 total sack (Hughes)

It's a small sample size, but looks just as broken

# 263 Bootzilla @ 08/22/14 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fancyclaps


	Just super simmed 3 games. 7 min QTRs, all pro, no slider adjustment, injuries OFF. Results: Jaguars - 26 @ Eagles - 19 Foles: 21/38 - 221 yds - 0td 2int -55% - 5.8 ypa Bortles: 26/41 - 202 yds - 0td 0int - 63% - 4.9 ypa Gerhart: 22 - 87 - 1 TD McCoy: 17 - 128 - 1 TD (Jax had 41 total carries - Bortles 6 for 0 yards) (Phi had 27 total carries - Foles 7 for -5 yards) no sacks for either team Indy - 24 @ Denver - 29 Peyotn: 34/48 - 281 yds - 2td 0int - 70% - 5.8 ypa Luck: 22/38 - 244 yds - 2td 0int - 57% - 6.4 ypa Ball: 17 - 72 1TD Bradshaw: 13 - 96 1 TD (Den 25 total carries, Peyton 4 for 9 yards) (Indy 24 total carries, Luck 5 for 12) *Trent Richardson had 6 attempts for 16 yards, the most accurate statistic yet!! 2 sacks by Denver (Knighton and Thomas) Buffalo - 24 @ Chicago - 31** Cutler: 23/33 - 265 yds - 2td 1int - 69% - 8 ypa Manuel: 22/38 - 198 yds - 1td 1int - 57% - 5.2 ypa Forte: 13 - 86 - 2 td Spiller: 15 - 80 - 1 td Jackson: 16 - 70 - 1 td (Chicago 23 total carries - Cutler 4 for 2 yards) (Buffalo 37 total carries - Manuel 7 for 19 yards) 1 total sack (Hughes) It's a small sample size, but looks just as broken

Actually not too bad. Passing attempts are good. Rushing attempts appear to be good as well. Passing yards could stand to be up a little bit but 250 yds a game gets you to 4,000 yards in a season. The passing TDs on the other hand do seem low and there seems to be too many carries by QBs that rarely ever run the ball.

These are far more in line with real life stats.

Whoa, just noticed Jax ran 82 plays...

# 264 CM Hooe @ 08/22/14 05:33 PM

Take solace in this, EA has officially acknowledged this issue.

Quote:

Originally Posted by @Josh_Looman


	We’re aware of the sim stats issues. We’re looking into it.

Hopefully they can push out a resolution sooner than later.

# 265 JayD @ 08/22/14 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CM Hooe


	Take solace in this, EA has officially acknowledged this issue. Hopefully they can push out a resolution sooner than later.

Nice. I knew with all the feedback from the community that this would not be overlooked. Thanks everyone!

# 266 Playmakers @ 08/22/14 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fancyclaps


	Just super simmed 3 games. 7 min QTRs, all pro, no slider adjustment, injuries OFF. Results: It's a small sample size, but looks just as broken

Just for the record sliders have no IMPACT on SIM stats anyway.

# 267 Cowboy008 @ 08/22/14 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CM Hooe


	Take solace in this, EA has officially acknowledged this issue. Hopefully they can push out a resolution sooner than later.

If they fix the sim stats do you think that could also fix the CPU cutting people?

# 268 extremeskins04 @ 08/22/14 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CM Hooe


	Take solace in this, EA has officially acknowledged this issue. Hopefully they can push out a resolution sooner than later.

This is promising news. I'm considering purchasing day one now and hopefully the patch will come soon after release.

# 269 T5063 @ 08/22/14 06:21 PM

Hopefully there will be some news by Tuesday as to a patch to fix this. I'll most likely pick up the game then if there is.

# 270 KingV2k3 @ 08/22/14 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CM Hooe


	Take solace in this, EA has officially acknowledged this issue. Hopefully they can push out a resolution sooner than later.

Good news!

But, it won't be GREAT news unless / until the issues that trigger those regression / roster issues are addressed as well...

Hopefully, there's enough of a "cause and effect" that fixing the former may influence the latter...

# 271 troy184 @ 08/22/14 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CM Hooe


	Take solace in this, EA has officially acknowledged this issue. Hopefully they can push out a resolution sooner than later.

Great news

# 272 Mauer4MVP @ 08/22/14 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamehead


	This is good to hear, but simultaneously disheartening at the same time--meaning, they're just NOW aware of it and looking into it? Or were they somewhat aware of it before and didn't really make it a priority, not expecting the online community to make such a big fuss? Oh well. I shall choose to be glad they are acknowledging it.

They probably caught it well before yesterday, but it is tough to postpone a launch, so you kind of have to just go ahead as plan and then fix it.

It is encouraging that they are acknowledging it now instead of a week from now. They have to realize how sensitive this is for sales, so I'd expect them to move on it fairly quickly.

# 273 Instant C1a55ic @ 08/22/14 07:22 PM

Man, I hope they fix the stats.

Aside from the stats, I cant live with that other stuff I have notieced that others have posted about, most notably the CCM rosters blowing up with elite players looking for new homes.

The games not a complete mess, but who can deal with 20+ elite players flooding the FA pool each year? In the end, i hope the stats have something to do with it.

# 274 DeuceDouglas @ 08/22/14 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flamehead


	This is good to hear, but simultaneously disheartening at the same time--meaning, they're just NOW aware of it and looking into it? Or were they somewhat aware of it before and didn't really make it a priority, not expecting the online community to make such a big fuss? Oh well. I shall choose to be glad they are acknowledging it.

It's because there seems to be extremely little testing that goes on with CFM. It seems like they just sim through stuff and make sure nothing crashes than actually pay attention to what's happening. This is stuff GC's should be finding as well. This is just like the rain glitch in franchise a couple years back and sliders not working at all in CFM the next year. Not nearly as game-breaking but it's all stuff you could find out in an hour session with it. I guess it's nice that they acknowledged it but that at best means a patch like a month or so in and could force a restart of a CFM upon up******. I remember it taking forever to fix the rain glitch and it wasn't until October, I believe, where they made the settings work that year.

# 275 Instant C1a55ic @ 08/22/14 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeuceDouglas


	It's because there seems to be extremely little testing that goes on with CFM. It seems like they just sim through stuff and make sure nothing crashes than actually pay attention to what's happening. This is stuff GC's should be finding as well. This is just like the rain glitch in franchise a couple years back and sliders not working at all in CFM the next year. Not nearly as game-breaking but it's all stuff you could find out in an hour session with it. I guess it's nice that they acknowledged it but that at best means a patch like a month or so in and could force a restart of a CFM upon up******. I remember it taking forever to fix the rain glitch and it wasn't until October, I believe, where they made the settings work that year.

Yeah a month sounds right. Too bad I wont be waiting...

# 276 extremeskins04 @ 08/22/14 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeuceDouglas


	It's because there seems to be extremely little testing that goes on with CFM. It seems like they just sim through stuff and make sure nothing crashes than actually pay attention to what's happening. This is stuff GC's should be finding as well. This is just like the rain glitch in franchise a couple years back and sliders not working at all in CFM the next year. Not nearly as game-breaking but it's all stuff you could find out in an hour session with it. I guess it's nice that they acknowledged it but that at best means a patch like a month or so in and could force a restart of a CFM upon up******. I remember it taking forever to fix the rain glitch and it wasn't until October, I believe, where they made the settings work that year.

I think they'll patch it sooner than a month.

# 277 raiderphantom @ 08/22/14 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sword1986


	Can we edit the attributes at least of opposing teams like NBA 2K lets us do?

Probably not in CFM. But you can probably edit rosters prior to starting it. I wish there was in season editing.

# 278 glitch3d @ 08/22/14 09:32 PM

The conspiracy theorist in me wants to think that this wasn't really overlooked and more "have them wait for a couple months so they have no choice but to go online and play" or even worse, "play MUT instead and spend real money".

But that can't be real. However, this somehow got overlooked. It sucks, but thankfully they acknowledged it which means now they WILL attempt to correct it.

# 279 fancyclaps @ 08/22/14 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by glitch3d


	The conspiracy theorist in me wants to think that this wasn't really overlooked and more "have them wait for a couple months so they have no choice but to go online and play" or even worse, "play MUT instead and spend real money". But that can't be real. However, this somehow got overlooked. It sucks, but thankfully they acknowledged it which means now they WILL attempt to correct it.

Well there's no way they missed it. With all the simming Looman said they did there's no way they could have. They probably just ran out of time and said screw it, if we get called out on it we'll claim ignorance and then try to patch it.

# 280 Sheba2011 @ 08/23/14 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fancyclaps


	Well there's no way they missed it. With all the simming Looman said they did there's no way they could have. They probably just ran out of time and said screw it, if we get called out on it we'll claim ignorance and then try to patch it.

The more likely scenario knowing how corporate America works, they knew about but the suits they work for (the one's who set the deadlines) said the game needs to be at the retailers by X date and there was no time to fix it at that point. Josh has already said on twitter he is aware of the problem and they are looking into it.

« Previous 1 2…11 12 131415 16 17…32 33 Next »

More Links

Madden NFL 15 Video - Simulated Season Stats