NBA 2K14 News Post

NBA 2K14 VC Shows Its Ugly Side

10:15 PM - December 10, 2013 by JohnDoe8865

Virtual Currency (VC) in NBA 2K14 is a problem and if consumers don't voice their concerns, it's going to get worse.

Sure, there are ways to get free VC via the mobile app (if you can get it working), but gamers shouldn't be required to use VC to do simple tasks such as changing a lineup. We can understand using it in MyTeam (as it has been successful for EA Sports and Ultimate Team), but to have it added into other modes really has the community fired up. Customization isn't as fun as it once was, since VC is needed to update accessories and the ratio is ridiculous. Could this be next?

While there are many posts here at OS slamming it, other sites such as NeoGAF and Reddit have also been killing it from day one. PastaPadre has written a detailed article on it and the hate is spilling over.

VGRevolution warned users about it last year. Twitter is filled with complaints from users actually purchasing VC and not receiving it or crashing/freezing in modes, losing what they've earned. With no official word from 2K Sports, this is becoming a very large concern.

Where do you stand on VC?

Game: NBA 2K14Reader Score: 6.5/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PC / PS3 / PS4 / Wii U / Xbox 360 / Xbox OneVotes for game: 98 - View All

NBA 2K14 Videos

Member Comments

# 201 yankeesgiants @ 12/12/13 01:55 PM

First off, I have no issue with VC. BUT, I have huge issues with how VC is structured in this game.

# 202 kadzier @ 12/12/13 02:06 PM

I've had issues with VC ever since they put it in My Career and made basic headbands and arm sleeve accessories, things that should be freely available, things that WERE freely available in previous versions, actually cost a significant part of your "yearly" salary. How can anyone see that as less than a shameless money grab?

# 203 poloelite @ 12/12/13 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by El_Poopador


	if youre the gm you also shouldnt be controlling the players on the court. you shouldnt be allowed to call plays. there are a lot of things that a gm cant do that you have to in this game. how are those any different? vc is fine if its used for things to enhance the experience (such as upgrading facilities or advertising to increase fan support). but it should not be necessary to perform basic functions that should not require any sort of money like setting rotations or firing someone.

I hear your argument man and agree, but I see where they were going with it as well. You're a bum GM and you're trying to get access to all levels of the organization and have to "progress" to get there. The fact that it's an actual video game, they have to let you do things on the court. Setting rotations takes one game to unlock. Is it the best idea, obviously not by the community's reaction. But I would be lying if I said I didn't get it and understand what they're trying to do. I personally don't have an issue with it. Now if setting rotations was 7,500 VC, I would definitely have an issue.

# 204 poloelite @ 12/12/13 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bludevilchief


	I don't want to play the games. I want to manage the team and sim the games.

Nothing I can say to this but they didn't build the game for people who like to simulate games unfortunately. In an effort to probably stop the amount of VC spam they would get with more given to simulating games, they sacrificed this option. Once again, I don't agree, but I do think they can tweak VC in the future so there's a better pricing model and reward system.

# 205 LorenzoDC @ 12/12/13 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poloelite


	Most of the stuff in myGM is pretty cheap from my experience and you get about 900 VC a game. By mid season, you should have a pretty competitive GM if you're playing the games.

I play 12 minute quarters. So your solution to me is to play half a season to rack up about 36,000 VC points to spend (win some lose some, average 900 VC points per game). That's 40 hours of in game gameplay, plus maybe 30% additional time to manage the mode in the main screen and sub menus. So, call it 52 hours.

52 hours for 36,000 VC. That's not fun gameplay, that's game grinding to be able to have the mode just function. Why is that? Because if I don't pay stuff to keep the morale of role players up, their morale tanks and I win fewer games (fun!). Or my coach may quit because I didn't buy a weight room (MOAR FUN!). Etc.

Meanwhile, embedded in every screen is a link for me to pay an extra $10 to buy 35,000 VC points. So, for an additional $10 I can free myself of the need to grind 52 hours of games (19 cents/hour), and instead, I can play the games that interest me, the ones I want to play, and take more time engaging the pure franchise management portion of the game. Maybe I can even have time to use the practice mode. Now I can have fun!

Once you start grinding games because you feel like you have to just to make the franchise management mode playable, it's stops being "play" and it becomes "work." It's like the feeling of trying to get out from under a debt. That's not entertainment, and they are selling an entertainment product.

There's a reason open world games are so popular: they maximize player choice. Do what you want, when you want. Explore! There are no negative gameplay repercussions for doing this, except maybe getting killed and resurrected. Because you do whatever you feel like at any moment, it's fun. It's not the role playing or story line alone that's fun, it's the freedom to roam, to choose, to explore, depending on your mood.

NBA 2k14 NG has taken choice away from the gamer. Customization is severely curtailed. Events in MyPlayer are more scripted and linear. Stories in general can be fun when done right, but even Mass Effect allowed for a lot of optional open world exploring, and choice about what mission to do when, until the end game sequence.

The implementation of VC in this game is, aside from everything else, just really bad game design. It's a pay to win game that forces people to play the game in a very narrowly defined way. So you get less fun, unless you give in and pay more than you thought you would when you paid your $60.

At that point it's less fun because you're probably pissed off and resentful. Not everyone will feel that way, but a lot will, including casual gamers. Would it affect half the game's buyers? Wouldn't surprise me in the least. Will that affect future sales? What do you think? Keep in mind the people playing now are the ones who could afford to buy a NG box at release. Later on, less wealthy gamers will be getting their hands on it, and they will be more pissed.

To escape grinding completely for a 12 minute quarter player, it would cost you a lot more than $10. I haven't tallied it up, but my wild guess is it could take at least 100,000 VC points to max out your MyGM without ever touching the other big bucket of VC store items under the Facilities and Game Pricing menus. That's easily another 75,000 VC points, off the top of my head. Two 80,000 (total 160,000) VC packs would cost you an additional $40. With all that, why would anyone buy a virtual suit and clothes for their MyGM? To earn 160,000 VC a 12 minute quarter player would have to play about 230 hours!

C'mon, man. Be serious. I can't believe some developer(s) at 2k didn't look at this when they were writing this code and say to themselves, man, this s**t is f****d up.

PS - I didn't even add in hours you lose because your game was booted from the 2k servers in the third quarter. There goes 45 minutes of your time! No VC for you! Grind again! Have a nice day!

# 206 youalreadknowwhoitis @ 12/12/13 05:00 PM

2k14 I have to say as far as vc goes is terrible I have gone through this issue 3-4 times already and the company also is bad when it comes to customer service they phone operators are very rude and they know nothing at least from whom I have talked to they don't wanna fix anything not alone refund the money to those who have purchased vc. this is sick they knew millions would log on this should never happen these are things they are suppose to know and fix when they drop they very first game. I think no one should buy their product until they can fix their screw ups i am not supporting this game or maker ever again

# 207 zasbury25 @ 12/12/13 05:26 PM

VC is pure profit for 2K, minus whatever fee/tax they have to pay MS/Sony to post it on their respective marketplaces. There are no features or modes added when you purchase VC...you are paying for the ability to unlock things already in the game stuck behind a virtual pay wall. They are in the game merely as a vehicle to squeeze more money out of you. They leave you the choice to either grind for the coins in-game or spend additional money to unlock items or attributes. They have tipped the scales in their favor to double-dip everyone; do I spend X hours of my precious time to buy that accessory or with the quick press of a few buttons, spend a few bucks to get it now? It is to the point where I have to make the choice of do I waste my time or pay extra money to get the experience I should already have and did have in the past.

Accessories and such were free or relatively attainable before...what changed that made them so expensive now? Why do gold packs in NG cost more VC than CG? Don't you get the same amount of items? If you want to sell MyTeam Gold packs, sell them for whatever you want them to be...Madden has no problems selling the UT packs for real dollar amounts.

In a sense, grinding for attributes or accessories has been in sports games for a while and I think most people would be OK with that. For example, in Tiger Woods Golf, you needed to achieve a certain level to unlock the best clubs or the Nike shoes. But, I feel, it was never to a point where something wasn't attainable through normal play of the game. To me, the economy in NBA 2K14 NG has been unbalanced to the point where I have to decide what mode I need to focus my attention on and not play the others because I feel I won't have the experience I deserve...unless I cut corners and go the easy way out and spend some real money for the fake coins.

A single currency (VC) that is tied to every mode in the game is just wrong. I shouldn't have to make the choice on which mode do I neglect, or not play at all, in order to purchase an attribute in MyGM, buy a gold pack in MyTeam, or max out my shoot in traffic rating in MyCareer. Also, any single-player experience should not be tied to a currency you can spend real money on...unless it is a F2P game, there is no place for it in a game I already spent money on.

2K got my money this go-around...if things don't change with the next iteration, I will seriously have to consider not buying the game new. I have always been a day-one purchaser of the series, but I know they don't get money directly from me if I buy it used. I know I can't not buy the game, but they won't be able to count me as a retail sale...at least I can take some satisfaction with that.

# 208 RipCityAndy @ 12/12/13 05:45 PM

The last 2k I purchased was 2k13. I refused to buy it this year (next gen or current gen). I really really dislike how VC has been implemented. I can't speak to 2014 (like I said - never bought it), but it ruined MyPlayer and MyTeam for me in 2k13. I spent more time spamming the VC glitch than playing the game. It is baffling that anyone would spend real money on VC given a clearly exploitable glitch, by the way.

The problem isn't VC (or coins, or whatever other in game currency) though. The problem is how frustratingly imbalanced it is. It is IMPOSSIBLE for a person with only a few daily hours (max) of video games to enjoy 2k with the current version of VC balance. That is, unless you want to purchase a ton of VC with your real money.

I'm voicing my frustration this year with my money - it's staying in my pocket. Sorry 2k. Fix it.

# 209 KayOtic723 @ 12/12/13 06:04 PM

people complaining about not having enough time to play just want things for free�.you have an option buy vc with real money�.I love the grind that vc makes you have to go through but i also play mlb the show and finish 162 game seasons only problem with vc is it cost a little to much for apparel but you really don't need that stuff

# 210 KayOtic723 @ 12/12/13 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KayOtic723


	people complaining about not having enough time to play just want things for free�.you have an option buy vc with real money�.I love the grind that vc makes you have to go through but i also play mlb the show and finish 162 game seasons only problem with vc is it cost a little to much for apparel but you really don't need that stuff

people would have real problems if they gave you everything free and charged $120 for the game

# 211 poloelite @ 12/12/13 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LorenzoDC


	I play 12 minute quarters. So your solution to me is to play half a season to rack up about 36,000 VC points to spend (win some lose some, average 900 VC points per game). That's 40 hours of in game gameplay, plus maybe 30% additional time to manage the mode in the main screen and sub menus. So, call it 52 hours. 52 hours for 36,000 VC. That's not fun gameplay, that's game grinding to be able to have the mode just function. Why is that? Because if I don't pay stuff to keep the morale of role players up, their morale tanks and I win fewer games (fun!). Or my coach may quit because I didn't buy a weight room (MOAR FUN!). Etc. Meanwhile, embedded in every screen is a link for me to pay an extra $10 to buy 35,000 VC points. So, for an additional $10 I can free myself of the need to grind 52 hours of games (19 cents/hour), and instead, I can play the games that interest me, the ones I want to play, and take more time engaging the pure franchise management portion of the game. Maybe I can even have time to use the practice mode. Now I can have fun! Once you start grinding games because you feel like you have to just to make the franchise management mode playable, it's stops being "play" and it becomes "work." It's like the feeling of trying to get out from under a debt. That's not entertainment, and they are selling an entertainment product. There's a reason open world games are so popular: they maximize player choice. Do what you want, when you want. Explore! There are no negative gameplay repercussions for doing this, except maybe getting killed and resurrected. Because you do whatever you feel like at any moment, it's fun. It's not the role playing or story line alone that's fun, it's the freedom to roam, to choose, to explore, depending on your mood. NBA 2k14 NG has taken choice away from the gamer. Customization is severely curtailed. Events in MyPlayer are more scripted and linear. Stories in general can be fun when done right, but even Mass Effect allowed for a lot of optional open world exploring, and choice about what mission to do when, until the end game sequence. The implementation of VC in this game is, aside from everything else, just really bad game design. It's a pay to win game that forces people to play the game in a very narrowly defined way. So you get less fun, unless you give in and pay more than you thought you would when you paid your $60. At that point it's less fun because you're probably pissed off and resentful. Not everyone will feel that way, but a lot will, including casual gamers. Would it affect half the game's buyers? Wouldn't surprise me in the least. Will that affect future sales? What do you think? Keep in mind the people playing now are the ones who could afford to buy a NG box at release. Later on, less wealthy gamers will be getting their hands on it, and they will be more pissed. To escape grinding completely for a 12 minute quarter player, it would cost you a lot more than $10. I haven't tallied it up, but my wild guess is it could take at least 100,000 VC points to max out your MyGM without ever touching the other big bucket of VC store items under the Facilities and Game Pricing menus. That's easily another 75,000 VC points, off the top of my head. Two 80,000 (total 160,000) VC packs would cost you an additional $40. With all that, why would anyone buy a virtual suit and clothes for their MyGM? To earn 160,000 VC a 12 minute quarter player would have to play about 230 hours! C'mon, man. Be serious. I can't believe some developer(s) at 2k didn't look at this when they were writing this code and say to themselves, man, this st is f**d up. PS - I didn't even add in hours you lose because your game was booted from the 2k servers in the third quarter. There goes 45 minutes of your time! No VC for you! Grind again! Have a nice day!

My dude your write up was insightful and I hear your gripes, but I think the point is to not max out your GM. Most GMs aren't maxed out and they have specific strong suits. I can't tell you what's entertaining to you or not, but myGM has been pretty entertaining to me besides the injury glitch. I wouldn't play the mode thinking somehow I should have a maxed out GM in the middle of year 1. That should take years to achieve. Because of what I'm reading here, do I think they need to balance the game better going forward? Yes!! But I just don't think VC is a terrible idea all the way around. I think there is a way to better balance it so both sides can be happy.

# 212 poloelite @ 12/12/13 06:37 PM

Man I hear everybody's gripes, I really do, but I can't say I feel them 100%. People who play myGM and actually play the game, will make enough VC to build a respectable GM. People who play myCareer will do the same. I do agree the price of packs in myTeam are ridiculous, but it seems the Domination mode will give you specific team packs that could yield Gold Players.

The wack side I'm noticing is 2K is making it so you have to build from being a scrub to the top and if you want to bypass that, then you have to buy VC. This sucks for online gamers because you will build regularly and some other guy may buy VC, I get that. But to the guys who want to play the game and mainly the offline portions (myGM and myCareer) how is VC stopping that? What if they called it XP, eliminated the price tag but had the same progression levels?

To me it seems like the best of both worlds because you can act as if VC doesn't exist (call it XP), play the game (which is why we bought it) and unlock things as you go along. Or, you can buy VC and play the game that you want to play it. The only thing that has seem to change to me is you can't max out your myPlayer or myGM in year 1 and dominate the league, which is realistic. I think this debate needs to go on and better balancing is needed, but the option to pay more and play the game the way you want to instead of how the developer wants you to, is a great option.

# 213 poloelite @ 12/12/13 06:39 PM

*seemed to change*

# 214 da ThRONe @ 12/12/13 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poloelite


	Man I hear everybody's gripes, I really do, but I can't say I feel them 100%. People who play myGM and actually play the game, will make enough VC to build a respectable GM. People who play myCareer will do the same. I do agree the price of packs in myTeam are ridiculous, but it seems the Domination mode will give you specific team packs that could yield Gold Players. The wack side I'm noticing is 2K is making it so you have to build from being a scrub to the top and if you want to bypass that, then you have to buy VC. This sucks for online gamers because you will build regularly and some other guy may buy VC, I get that. But to the guys who want to play the game and mainly the offline portions (myGM and myCareer) how is VC stopping that? What if they called it XP, eliminated the price tag but had the same progression levels? To me it seems like the best of both worlds because you can act as if VC doesn't exist (call it XP), play the game (which is why we bought it) and unlock things as you go along. Or, you can buy VC and play the game that you want to play it. The only thing that has seem to change to me is you can't max out your myPlayer or myGM in year 1 and dominate the league, which is realistic. I think this debate needs to go on and better balancing is needed, but the option to pay more and play the game the way you want to instead of how the developer wants you to, is a great option.

What sucks the most is 2K won't move to a more natural form of progression in any of their modes now in order to promote VC. The fact that we even have skill points/VC going into next gen now is a clear example of a lack of realistic growth with the game and these modes more specifically.

I have no problems with them providing short cuts for people. However basing a mode around VC is completely wrong. If you want to sell me something sell me a combine, summer league, and training camp I'll pay extra for those.

# 215 spacedog @ 12/12/13 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KayOtic723


	people would have real problems if they gave you everything free and charged $120 for the game

That's because the content already on the disc isn't worth an extra $60 on top of the $60 price tag smh I don't know where you're getting this whole concept of wanting free stuff. Nobody's asking for free stuff. Some might and that's their problem. Anyway, some people may want to buy VC to help boost their players when they have little free time and that's ok, players should be able to do that. But 2k tries to force that on everyone by making it so that the grind to unlock things is so excessive that it wouldn't be worth the time, leaving the purchase of VC as the most viable option. That's how the free to play model works, even though this game isn't free.

Personally I actually often enjoy when DLC comes out, micro transactions, etc. when they add new content. I'll pay for extra content easily if I want it, because people put work into extra content and I try to pay it back buy giving them the money due. Can't say the same about 2k. Lots of the things you pay VC for aren't extra content whatsoever. Again, they're trending toward the free to play model without a free to play game.

And lastly, your other post seems like you think people who don't have time to play all day are lazy or something (saying they want free stuff when you're wrong). Think about what you're suggesting. This is a video game. People that don't have all day probably do things like, you know, go to school, or work. And yet they're the ones who want free stuff? lol Ok so grinding in a video game and being able to buy a headband is real work nowadays apparently.

# 216 Sundown @ 12/12/13 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poloelite


	I think this debate needs to go on and better balancing is needed, but the option to pay more and play the game the way you want to instead of how the developer wants you to, is a great option.

This has really been what the debate has been all along (by more reasonable folks anyway).

But the rewards have been tweaked and the costs have been raised so people feel like you can no longer "play how you want" without paying additional money. Instead, they feel like the developer wants you to grind or pay up. And if you actually want to progress at a reasonable rate in more than one mode, again, grind or pay up.

This wasn't how 2K played before and people don't enjoy that change. It feels as if 2K has been actively unbalancing the game, and it's easy to suspect what the motivation behind it might be. That's why the complaints have gone from "VC is okay, we just need some balancing" to "VC is terrible, because its inclusion into all modes singlehandedly DRIVES the unbalancing."

# 217 ahuffman @ 12/12/13 07:40 PM

The bigger problem for me is the side effects of VC. Not being able to play modes like MyGM offline is such bs and clearly due to the VC. I also wonder how much dev time was wasted on this that could have gone for more important things.

# 218 kadzier @ 12/12/13 07:48 PM

Some people don't seem to get it. Having a sense of progression is good, and giving players the option to bypass that progression by paying can be good. So the concept of VC itself isn't inherently bad.

What is inherently bad is messing up the delicate balance of that progression to encourage the spending of VC. This is exactly what has happened with 2k14. Players have to restrict themselves to one mode, and grind out multiple games for rewards that are totally disproportionate to the effort. Either that or they play the game for 8 hours every day or say "screw it" and spend money. None of those choices are desirable for me.

I'm okay with super rare or special stuff maybe taking weeks or months of normal playing time to acquire, like a unique pair of shoes or something. It's not okay when it's things like basic arm sleeve accessories or the ability to perform basic functions essential to the game (changing your rotations, training players, etc).

# 219 quehouston @ 12/12/13 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by da ThRONe


	What sucks the most is 2K won't move to a more natural form of progression in any of their modes now in order to promote VC. The fact that we even have skill points/VC going into next gen now is a clear example of a lack of realistic growth with the game and these modes more specifically. I have no problems with them providing short cuts for people. However basing a mode around VC is completely wrong. If you want to sell me something sell me a combine, summer league, and training camp I'll pay extra for those.

I almost made that last sentence part of my signature. Well put.

# 220 Sinner @ 12/12/13 07:53 PM

Reading through some of the new post a thought hit me, I realize this may be a little out there but many of us...myself included wished 2k had gotten the NFL license.

With all the players on the field and everything that goes on could you imagine how bad VC would have been in that? Work with the QB Coach, 400 VC, work with defense 400 VC, work with offense 400VC. Coach ability to communicate with Coach in the press Box 500 VC, ability to challenge play and throw the red flag 500 VC (Oh by the way....Red Flag 600 VC)

« Previous 1 2…7 8 9 101112 13 14 15 Next »

More Links

NBA 2K14 VC Shows Its Ugly Side