I just miss the days where you could walk in a room and see 2k on the tv and at first glance think its a real NBA game on, now its just an immediate video game look to it and I know that sounds crazy since that is what it is, but I want things to look as close to what I see in real life as possible, 2k14 did a pretty good job in making it look pretty close to real life graphically.
I just miss the days where you could walk in a room and see 2k on the tv and at first glance think its a real NBA game on, now its just an immediate video game look to it and I know that sounds crazy since that is what it is, but I want things to look as close to what I see in real life as possible, 2k14 did a pretty good job in making it look pretty close to real life graphically.
This is an over exaggeration and pretty much a lie. At first glance even 2K15 looks like a real game. Some of these comments in here are pretty damn ridiculous
This is an over exaggeration and pretty much a lie. At first glance even 2K15 looks like a real game. Some of these comments in here are pretty damn ridiculous
Factoring everything, I personally prefer 2k15 though...especially looking back through those threads
Yea I just looked back like an hour ago and was like " well , it's bright " but the skin tone and faces and body types to agree are better in 15 . Only thing 2k14 has going for is that it's brighter but the spit shine glare on all the players foreheads were annoying .
2k9, 10 on last gen had the best 2k graphics IMO . If they stuck with those and added 2k14 animations it would have been dope and rivaled 2k11 for best 2k game .
Curry has kind of this "thousand-yard stare" (crazy) look in his eyes
as I said in a previous post, the pic Curry pic is good, but there really isn't much of a difference (other than hairstyle) from 2k15. The one thing about lighting in the other game is that it highlights a player's facial bone structure, dimensions, creases etc. So the proper lighting has more to do than just making things brighter. Without it, surfaces still look kind of 'flat'.
This is an over exaggeration and pretty much a lie. At first glance even 2K15 looks like a real game. Some of these comments in here are pretty damn ridiculous
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
By the last couple of pages you would think 2k was out here looking like this:
If that is a real 2k16 shot of MJ (and not a PC mod), then it is much better than his likeness in previous games. As an MJ fan this is important, because I do like to play with historic teams.
2K is going to have their work cut out for them on this one lol. I don't know what D got going on here, but damn bruh. This was apparently last night an Adidas game.
Spoiler
What d rose being lazy and quitting the bulls again? Attachment 103791
This is an over exaggeration and pretty much a lie. At first glance even 2K15 looks like a real game. Some of these comments in here are pretty damn ridiculous
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Calm down King your getting to emotional over my OPINION, I am obviously not the only one in this thread that feels this way so its not like I am reaching, even guys that are saying 2k15 and 16 look great are saying it needs work in lighting, and IDK what games you have seen on tv where there is little to no court reflections but if that looks realistic to you then to each its own.
Calm down King your getting to emotional over my OPINION, I am obviously not the only one in this thread that feels this way so its not like I am reaching, even guys that are saying 2k15 and 16 look great are saying it needs work in lighting, and IDK what games you have seen on tv where there is little to no court reflections but if that looks realistic to you then to each its own.
Lmao everyone here gets emotional over someone's opinion. Not king tho he seems like he knows the difference