Home
Tecmo Bowl Throwback News Post


Tecmo Bowl Throwback is now available on the Marketplace and should be available for the PS3 tomorrow. Post your impressions here.

Game: Tecmo Bowl ThrowbackReader Score: 8.5/10 - Vote Now
Platform: iPhone / PS3 / Xbox 360Votes for game: 9 - View All
Member Comments
# 281 babythug23 @ 05/06/10 09:16 PM
I'm waiting for the ps3 release but i do have a 360. So i tried the demo/trial game and i didn't know i could change it from 5mins to 15.... That will hold me over for a while
 
# 282 DJ @ 05/06/10 09:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CreatineKasey
Anyone have any idea when the patch drops?

EDIT: Patch was cancelled. sounds like the lag is here to stay.
Kasey, where was it announced that the patch was cancelled? That's a bummer. Good thing I've still got a NES so I can run some TSB if I need a Tecmo fix
 
# 283 centauris @ 05/06/10 09:52 PM
LOL

you have got to be kidding me.

this game is dead without a patch...
 
# 284 CreatineKasey @ 05/06/10 09:57 PM
 
# 285 speedkills @ 05/06/10 10:20 PM
That sucks. I have played lag-free games as the hostee so it is possible but I have enough trouble finding anyone online to play as it is. I see multiplayer dying a quick death.

It's a $10 XBLA game so I guess no support is to be expected.

Damn it all.
 
# 286 centauris @ 05/06/10 10:26 PM
You have got to be kidding me.
 
# 287 mkharsh33 @ 05/07/10 01:51 AM
well, at least i can enjoy the offline play... i was waiting to get online for the now non-existent patch to drop. oh well... a bit disappointed but still enjoy the game.
 
# 288 Valdarez @ 05/07/10 04:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CreatineKasey
I primarily bought the game for the MP capability which is all but broken due to lag, game freezers, NT dive exploit (only real exploit), and inability to modify playbooks. Worse, I have told others to buy the game because there was a patch coming. If you own a PS3, don't buy the game. End of story. Don't support a company that puts out broken games.

I wonder if it's possible to get a refund on the game?
 
# 289 CreatineKasey @ 05/07/10 09:39 AM
They should know better. In a game based heavily on reaction, lag kills excitement. I hope they did sell enough for a sequel, but I don't know if I'll be able to put a heavy amount of time into the game. It DID seem like there were more people available to play the last few days over the first couple.

Does anyone know the actual sales numbers for the first week of the game? It has over 2000 ratings, so I don't think it completely bombed.
 
# 290 DJ @ 05/07/10 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CreatineKasey
That's why I waited for the impressions to come in before buying. I was burned last year with the DS version. It had the same issues as the lag made that game unplayable online as well.

I still may get this for offline play, but I'm not going to rush to buy it.
 
# 291 Methlab @ 05/07/10 10:29 AM
I'm with you DJ. I read through this thread. It is typical OS. Every one swears it is a must buy, and then about 2 weeks later, the game is dead to them. Patience is a virtue.

I appreciate the posts though. I would have bought the game today and was skipping pages ahead to see if there would be a patch. Now we know that Tecmo is a garbage company who just wanted to take your money based off their past success.
 
# 292 Valdarez @ 05/07/10 10:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djwlfpack
That's why I waited for the impressions to come in before buying. I was burned last year with the DS version. It had the same issues as the lag made that game unplayable online as well.

I still may get this for offline play, but I'm not going to rush to buy it.
It's still fine for offline play. I know I'm personally sick of being sold broken games by sports makers. Tecmo, EA Sports, 2K Sports, it's universal that their products are bug ridden and for me at least, I'm beyond the breaking point. IMHO they need to in act legislation against companies who knowingly create broken products (software), just like they do with physical goods. This generation is the worse level of games ever. And I mean EVER made. Thank you M$ for creating the 360 and 'auto-update' for us gamers....
 
# 293 CaptainZombie @ 05/07/10 11:11 AM
The PS3 delay has been a blessing in disguise imo. Offline might be ok, but what gets me is that this team/company doesn't even want to release a patch to fix the broken MP. I find that insane, so if there are bugs in SP mode that come up in a week or two, we will never see that stuff fixed.
 
# 294 DJ @ 05/07/10 11:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valdarez
It's still fine for offline play. I know I'm personally sick of being sold broken games by sports makers. Tecmo, EA Sports, 2K Sports, it's universal that their products are bug ridden and for me at least, I'm beyond the breaking point. IMHO they need to in act legislation against companies who knowingly create broken products (software), just like they do with physical goods. This generation is the worse level of games ever. And I mean EVER made. Thank you M$ for creating the 360 and 'auto-update' for us gamers....
I'm with you there. The question is, how do you stop the cycle? I fear that things will only get worse, not better, as time goes on and we move to the next round of consoles.

It's not fair to consumers who spend $60-plus on a game to have to wait several months before the actual "finished" version of the game is completed. I think the gaming companies backed themselves into a corner with the tight deadlines they've imposed on themselves.

Do we really need to have the games a month or two before the actual season starts? I'd rather see that time spent further developing and testing the game. Release the game on opening day (any sport); it'd be a huge event and you'd be able to market the game well. The only "patch" would be accurate opening day rosters.
 
# 295 speedkills @ 05/07/10 03:11 PM
I'm fine with patches as long as there are no major issues with the release version and it could stand on it's own if needed. But yeah, I hate when they release an obvious unfinished game and let us pay $60 to be beta testers.


I'm not too down on Tecmo for not releasing a patch. From what I understand patches for XBLA games are rare if any as you get what you pay for. Multiplayer issues aside, they did create an excellent remake of the single player game. I think it was easily worth the 800 pts.
 
# 296 CaptainZombie @ 05/07/10 04:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedkills
I'm fine with patches as long as there are no major issues with the release version and it could stand on it's own if needed. But yeah, I hate when they release an obvious unfinished game and let us pay $60 to be beta testers.


I'm not too down on Tecmo for not releasing a patch. From what I understand patches for XBLA games are rare if any as you get what you pay for. Multiplayer issues aside, they did create an excellent remake of the single player game. I think it was easily worth the 800 pts.
Does the singleplayer seem to run smooth? I tried the 1Q demo on XBL, but that wasn't enough to tell.
 
# 297 Methlab @ 05/07/10 05:37 PM
im bummed because multiplayer tecmo bowl is really where it is at.
 
# 298 dbeth @ 05/07/10 05:59 PM
This sucks! Multiplayer may be dead for me because of the lag.

Hmmm....maybe I'll try to join games and see if I can win ONE game with me lagging. That will be the ultimate victory.

On to the challenge.....
 
# 299 Flightwhite24 @ 05/07/10 07:44 PM
I was really looking forward to this game, but dang the MP does not work properly? It's a shame that paying gamers keep getting the shaft with half-cooked games.

It is becoming the norm with these gaming co's. Until some type of penalties, accountability,fines these things will continue to happen. They are taking advantage of us at this point. Plain and simple. Peace!!!
 
# 300 speedkills @ 05/07/10 08:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GearsX8
Does the singleplayer seem to run smooth? I tried the 1Q demo on XBL, but that wasn't enough to tell.

Smooth as I can't believe it's not butter.
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.