mkharsh33 MLB 2K11 ROSTERS (360 ONLY)

[Fiddy]

mk.. you been around long enough, you cant ever please everyone (you already know that)..

keep doing what your doing, bc more guys like me etc appreciate your hard work and hours you put into sliders and rosters for all the games.

no need to stop bc of certain guys, just hit the ignore button and continue on.

i personally cant wait for the final version of the rosters.

[DJ]

Yeah, I'm on the verge of picking this game back up and would certainly use your end of the year roster set.

[mkharsh33]

Need a favor...

Would like some feedback on how to translate basic ratings from real statistics into the game... Example: batting averages between .200 to .210 would be in the contact range of _____________? And put together a scale for:

1) batting contact
2) batting power
3) pitcher stats

Just to clear the record, I'm not having a mid-life crisis (as suggested here). That was a bit funny. Also, I'm not this arrogant pr!ck that needs pats on the back. Funny, but when anyone steps up to do rosters, and puts a lot of time into them, they are automatically labeled as arrogant (or something like that). I took up this task because, just in case no one here has noticed, no one else has. There are no multiple 360 rosters provided here... LTrain8 did a lot of work with prospects, and after messaging him, we wanted to put his work into my file.

But I'm willing to put all the nonsense here aside and ask for feedback on how to develop a ratings system.

One more thought: if a guy is 1) a prospect or 2) not an everyday player, I want some freedom to tweak based upon the limited statistics, using his track record. Also, I rate relief pitchers slightly lower than starters. A starter with (say) a 2.80 ERA would get a higher rating than a reliever with a 2.00 ERA.... I believe this is a fair interpretation...

Thanks!

[wudl83]

For batting contact simply take something like this:
avg. = contact
.40 = 99
.35 = 89
.30 = 79
.25 = 69
.20 = 59
.15 = 49
.10 = 39
.05 = 29
I would recommend to lower the contact for rookies and players with few games. I did it like this for my own roster like in the other post mentioned.

For batting power - hm. Is it only the homerun-rating? I don't have really a clue here how to sort it out. You could perhaps take the ab/hr stat. But then I don't know how to arrange it. I simply made it by "feeling" in my roster.

For pitcher stats I can't give you something right now. I am still trying to figure it out myself. Problem for me is the contact rating. Seems you got to make the contact rating quite low in the 60s for most of the pitchers, otherwise you produce to much guys with an overall rating of 80+.

Your mentioned "thoughts" sound quite interesting and perhaps I will try them out myself.

[brewercrew19]

Yeah, I'm the only one allowed to make fun of harsh. Jerks. Odd that you've been doing these rosters for years and just now decided to try and figure out a rating system. Does explain quite a bit however.

[mkharsh33]

Quote: Originally Posted by brewercrew19

Yeah, I'm the only one allowed to make fun of harsh. Jerks. Odd that you've been doing these rosters for years and just now decided to try and figure out a rating system. Does explain quite a bit however.

are you the same person from the 2k forums (Brewcrew19)? if so, please stop... I will not stand for your antagonism and will also be letting a Mod know of your behavior. If you have nothing helpful to offer, please do not ruin it for those here who are. I've done NOTHING against you, and I do not appreciate you only showing up here to be a smart alec...

[mkharsh33]

Quote: Originally Posted by wudl83

For batting contact simply take something like this: avg. = contact .40 = 99 .35 = 89 .30 = 79 .25 = 69 .20 = 59 .15 = 49 .10 = 39 .05 = 29 I would recommend to lower the contact for rookies and players with few games. I did it like this for my own roster like in the other post mentioned. For batting power - hm. Is it only the homerun-rating? I don't have really a clue here how to sort it out. You could perhaps take the ab/hr stat. But then I don't know how to arrange it. I simply made it by "feeling" in my roster. For pitcher stats I can't give you something right now. I am still trying to figure it out myself. Problem for me is the contact rating. Seems you got to make the contact rating quite low in the 60s for most of the pitchers, otherwise you produce to much guys with an overall rating of 80+. Your mentioned "thoughts" sound quite interesting and perhaps I will try them out myself.

Appreciate this... fielding ideas and am thankful you posted.

Here's what I'd like to see:

.330-.340 =
.320-330 =
.310-320 =
.300-.310 =

And on down the line, all the way down to .190 (which seems to be the low mark. Anything lower won't be hard to adjust.

Regarding Brew's comment above: I've done rosters now for TWO years - this is only my second year of doing them. I never claimed they were "perfect" and in doing these for only my second year, I'm humble enough to ask for help. I've contacted a Mod regarding your attitude and am hopeful they will take into consideration what I wrote them. There are many great people who post here and have been helpful. It is unfair to shun them away because of your ignorance and arrogant posts, constantly putting down people.

[Pared]

Quote: Originally Posted by brewercrew19

Yeah, I'm the only one allowed to make fun of harsh. Jerks. Odd that you've been doing these rosters for years and just now decided to try and figure out a rating system. Does explain quite a bit however.

Keep this garbage up and you won't be a member here for long.

If you have nothing useful to post, don't post anything.