NBA 2K16 News Post

NBA 2K16 Player Ratings For the Top Players on Each Team

02:44 AM - September 19, 2015 by Daddy123

Check out the NBA 2K16 player ratings for the top players on each team. This includes player ratings for the classic teams, but not the Euro teams.

NOTE: There will be a roster update when the game is released. Beds will tweet and has continued to post accurate ratings based off of that updated roster on his Twitter feed, so they are more accurate.

The Atlanta Hawks and classic 1995 Orlando Magic were missing from the video, but here they are below.

Game: NBA 2K16Reader Score: 8/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PC / PS3 / PS4 / Xbox 360 / Xbox OneVotes for game: 45 - View All

NBA 2K16 Videos

Member Comments

# 41 Yeah...THAT Guy @ 09/19/15 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aylmer1981


	They both got a 91 so it's rated exactly as ur belief.

He's saying Pierce's prime should be a 91; not the 07 version.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

# 42 Bigman101 @ 09/19/15 03:40 PM

How is Aldridge from the Spurs a better shooter than harden. Do 2k know what harden goes through to score last yr. smh. Make harden med range a 83 and the 3 a 85 that's all I ask. Or simply lower Aldridge shots.

# 43 barrman7 @ 09/19/15 03:42 PM

Kyle korver is easily an 81.

# 44 dirk.93 @ 09/19/15 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bigman101


	How is Aldridge from the Spurs a better shooter than harden. Do 2k know what harden goes through to score last yr. smh. Make harden med range a 83 and the 3 a 85 that's all I ask. Or simply lower Aldridge shots.

Aldridge is the best midrange shooter in the league

# 45 Cuban_Linx @ 09/19/15 05:10 PM

These ratings seem off. How is 01 Shaq anything less than a 98? Iverson also seems to be very overrated with that 94 rating. Poor Wade is also getting underrated again.

# 46 Kstat @ 09/19/15 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cuban_Linx


	These ratings seem off. How is 01 Shaq anything less than a 98? Iverson also seems to be very overrated with that 94 rating. Poor Wade is also getting underrated again.

01 Shaq was great but only when he needed to be. Ironically you say AI is overrated at 94 when he WAS the MVP that season and dragged Philly to the finals with a bunch of crap around him.

71 kareem is a 97. 01 shaq was not better than 71 kareem.

# 47 UnbelievablyRAW @ 09/19/15 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aylmer1981


	They both got a 91 so it's rated exactly as ur belief.

07 Pierce wasn't Pierce in his prime. If they think 07 Pierce is a 91 then I can't imagine where they'd put prime Pierce considering they gave 06 Wade a 93 (and I'd take 06 Wade over any version Pierce)

# 48 Kstat @ 09/19/15 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UnbelievablyRAW


	07 Pierce wasn't Pierce in his prime. If they think 07 Pierce is a 91 then I can't imagine where they'd put prime Pierce considering they gave 06 Wade a 93 (and I'd take 06 Wade over any version Pierce)

It's very arguable that he was.

His numbers were down because he played for a stacked team, but you saw both in the Cavs series against leBron me the finals where he was the MVP that he was as good as he ever was.

# 49 BluFu @ 09/19/15 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UnbelievablyRAW


	07 Pierce wasn't Pierce in his prime. If they think 07 Pierce is a 91 then I can't imagine where they'd put prime Pierce considering they gave 06 Wade a 93 (and I'd take 06 Wade over any version Pierce)

The two seasons before 08, he was averaging 25 & 27 per game. In 08, he had to share shots with KG and Ray Ray (which explains his decreased production).

# 50 bballshawn24 @ 09/19/15 06:15 PM

jordan clarkson a 75?

# 51 BlessingSpore72 @ 09/19/15 06:19 PM

I can't believe based on the ratings that they think the 95-96 Jordan is the best season of all time. It's not even Jordans best year. Do they not realize that the 3 point line was closer so he took a ton of 3s and had a high %. And 97-98 is not the second greatest season ever. There r a lot of players that should be rated higher then that jordan.

Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

# 52 Black_Tom_Brady @ 09/19/15 06:32 PM

RICK FOX everybody!!!

# 53 Kstat @ 09/19/15 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlessingSpore72


	I can't believe based on the ratings that they think the 95-96 Jordan is the best season of all time. It's not even Jordans best year. Do they not realize that the 3 point line was closer so he took a ton of 3s and had a high %. And 97-98 is not the second greatest season ever. There r a lot of players that should be rated higher then that jordan. Sent from my SGH-I337M using Tapatalk

You really think that was just because of his three point shooting?

His average was lower because the whole league played at a slower pace. He changed his game but his jumper was way more consistent. Oh and the 72 wins thing with pippen rodman Kukoc and a bunch of random dudes.

Jordan's intangibles were off the charts in 96. Putting the numbers aside he was insanely good that year. 98 he was really damn close to it too (which a crumbling team around him needing him to carry them more).

# 54 BluFu @ 09/19/15 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kstat


	You really think that was just because of his three point shooting? His average was lower because the whole league played at a slower pace. He changed his game but his jumper was way more consistent. Oh and the 72 wins thing with pippen rodman Kukoc and a bunch of random dudes. Jordan's intangibles were off the charts in 96. Putting the numbers aside he was insanely good that year. 98 he was really damn close to it too (which a crumbling team around him needing him to carry them more).

Yeah I'm not a fan of the 'linear' ratings for Jordan myself. His '89 year is pretty underrated.

# 55 Jonjon22 @ 09/19/15 07:30 PM

Am I the only one that thinks Blake griffin should be rated atleast a 90 overall? I mean dude had an amazing season followed by a great performance in the post season and yet he's the same overall as Melo who barely played last season. Smh

# 56 dpower15 @ 09/19/15 07:38 PM

All I know is that these overalls look fantastic compared to what has been in stock rosters in previous years. Can't wait for release fay

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

# 57 SaruAqua @ 09/19/15 07:43 PM

How in the blue hell is '07 LeBron a 95, yet '06 Wade is a 93?

'06 Finals:
Wade - 34.7 ppg, 7.8 rpg, 3.8 apg on 46.8%FG /27.3%3PT/77.3%FT

'07 Finals:
LeBron - 22 ppg, 7 rpg, 6.8 apg on 35.6%FG/20%3PT/69%FT

2K stays underrating Dwyane Wade.

# 58 8KB24 @ 09/19/15 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaruAqua


	How in the blue hell is '07 LeBron a 95, yet '06 Wade is a 93? '06 Finals: Wade - 34.7 ppg, 7.8 rpg, 3.8 apg on 46.8%FG /27.3%3PT/77.3%FT '07 Finals: LeBron - 22 ppg, 7 rpg, 6.8 apg on 35.6%FG/20%3PT/69%FT 2K stays underrating Dwyane Wade.

I suggest comparing whole seasons and not few games.

# 59 DC @ 09/19/15 07:47 PM

Not sure if it was mentioned but did anyone notice that 2K switched the order of their team sorting?

It no longer is based on Nickname but based on the City? But the 76ers were listed first, which shouldn't be right.

# 60 fufo @ 09/19/15 07:47 PM

OK. No Rasheed.

But why no Mehmet Okur AND Corliss Williamson?

Why did they even put 03-04 pistons then? There aren't any power forwards.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

« Previous 1 234 5 6 7 Next »

More Links

NBA 2K16 Player Ratings For the Top Players on Each Team