Madden NFL 16 News Post

Full Spreadsheet of Madden NFL 16 Player Ratings Available Now

12:49 PM - August 12, 2015 by Steve_OS

EA Sports has just released the full spreadsheet of Madden NFL 16 player ratings.

If you want to dive right in, download it here and let us know what you think!

Some specific ratings are listed below.

Highest Rated Players: Aaron Rodgers (99) Rob Gronkowski (99) J.J. Watt (99) Marshal Yanda (98) Von Miller (97) Justin Houston (97) Darrelle Revis (97) Josh Sitton (97) Tom Brady (97) Richard Sherman (97) Antonio Brown (97)

Highest Speed Rating: Breshad Perriman (97) Mario Alford (97) Phillip Dorsett (96) Dri Archer (96) J.J. Nelson (96) Corey Grant (96) Saalim Hakim (96) Reggie Dunn (96) Shane Wynn (96) Brandin Cooks (95) Tavon Austin (95) Trae Waynes (95) Marquise Goodwin (95) DeMarcus Van **** (95) Bryce Callahan (95) Onterio McCalebb (95)

Highest Acceleration Rating: Antwon Blake (97) Marquise Goodwin (96) Cedric Peerman (96) Marcus Sherels (96) Dri Archer (95) Saalim Hakim (95) Kenny Bell (95) Darryl Roberts (95) Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie (95) Colin Jones (95) P.J. Williams (95) DuJuan Harris (95) Ameer Abdullah (95) Julian Stanford (95)

Strongest Players: Ndamukong Suh (98) Stephen Paea (98) Jason Peters (98) Dontari Poe (97) Russell Bodine (97) J.J. Watt (97) Jared Veldheer (97) Mike Iupati (97) Dan Williams (96) Haloti Ngata (96) Brandon Williams (96) Phil Loadholt (96) Mackenzy Bernadeau (96) Vince Wilfork (96) Star Lotulelei (96) David Molk (96)

Highest Agility Rating: LeSean McCoy (99) Percy Harvin (98) Jamaal Charles (98) Tavon Austin (98) Odell Beckham Jr. (98) Andrew Hawkins (98) Adrian Peterson (97) Dez Bryant (97) Byron Jones (97) Patrick Peterson (97) Cordarrelle Patterson (97) Joe Haden (97) Randall Cobb (97) Desmond Trufant (97) Darren Sproles (97) Antonio Brown (97) DeSean Jackson (97) De'Anthony Thomas (97) John Brown (97)

Highest Catch Rating: Antonio Brown (99) Dez Bryant (98) Calvin Johnson (97) Odell Beckham Jr. (97) Jordy Nelson (96) Jason Witten (95) Julian Edelman (95) Demaryius Thomas (94) Randall Cobb (94) A.J. Green (94) Rob Gronkowski (94) Julio Jones (94) Larry Fitzgerald (93) Emmanuel Sanders (93) T.Y. Hilton (93) Jeremy Maclin (93) DeAndre Hopkins (93) Alshon Jeffery (93) Keenan Allen (93)

Highest Throw Power: Matthew Stafford (99) Jay Cutler (98) Cam Newton (97) Ryan Mallett (97) Joe Flacco (97) Derek Carr (96) Colin Kaepernick (95) Aaron Rodgers (95) Jameis Winston (95) Zach Mettenberger (95) Andrew Luck (95) Brock Osweiler (95) Tom Savage (94) Logan Thomas (94) Ben Roethlisberger (94) Tom Brady (94)

Highest Short Accuracy Rating: Tom Brady (96) Peyton Manning (95) Aaron Rodgers (94) Tony Romo (93) Drew Brees (93) Philip Rivers (91)

Highest Mid Accuracy Rating: Tom Brady (97) Aaron Rodgers (92) Tony Romo (92) Drew Brees (91) Peyton Manning (90) Philip Rivers (90) Ben Roethlisberger (90)

Highest Deep Accuracy Rating: Aaron Rodgers (80) Matt Ryan (80) Drew Brees (79) Tony Romo (78) Joe Flacco (76) Jameis Winston (76) Peyton Manning (75) Andrew Luck (75) Philip Rivers (74)

Highest Tackle Rating: Luke Kuechly (98) Damon Harrison (97) Sheldon Richardson (97) Bobby Wagner (97) NaVorro Bowman (97) Lavonte David (97) C.J. Mosley (96) Muhammad Wilkerson (96) DeAndre Levy (96)

Highest Truck Rating: Marshawn Lynch (98) Eddie Lacy (97) LeGarrette Blount (96) DeMarco Murray (96) Chris Ivory (96) Jeremy Hill (95) Alfred Morris (94) Adrian Peterson (94)

Highest Elusive Rating: Golden Taten (98) DeMarco Murray (97) DeSean Jackson (97) Jonathan Stewart (96) Antonio Brown (96) Le'Veon Bell (95) Percy Harvin (95) Jamaal Charles (95) Cordarrelle Patterson (95) Andrew Hawkins (95) T.Y. Hilton (95)

Game: Madden NFL 16Reader Score: 7/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / PS4 / Xbox 360 / Xbox OneVotes for game: 24 - View All

Madden NFL 16 Videos

Member Comments

# 141 TD3322 @ 08/17/15 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sammy watkins


	To add to what everyone is saying. I think Richard Sherman has like the 12th highest man coverage rating in the game. These are honestly the worst Madden ratings ever. Such crap.

Well Sherm is NOT a man corner. Honestly his Man rating may still be a lil High

Sent from my LGMS395 using Tapatalk

# 142 fhs2 @ 08/20/15 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SECElit3


	8 pages of concerns, complaints, and arguing: It is extremely important to the future of the franchise for everyone who cares to get the word out about the FBG system. It is quite frankly the best and most true to life rating system ever created. Get the word out to Rex and other decision makers that this system needs to be a part of Madden going forward. Support our roster! Download it, use it, and talk about it! Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I really want to like fbg system, but can't, because of the overall ratings. You can say what you want about overall don't matter, but it matters. Is the ovrl rating who dictates who starts or not in CFM. Also, who is cut, who makes the team, who's signed in FA. All about overall rating. Until it does not makes sense, i can't use this roster. The rookies will enter the league as superstars too, the majority of then. How can i play with this roster, this way?
Oh, and as a Bills fan, i can't accept Eric Wood as our best player. Sorry. It doesn't makes any sense.
Please convince me about this roster, because i'm tired to re-rate all the roster before start my CCM

# 143 DCEBB2001 @ 08/20/15 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fhs2


	I really want to like fbg system, but can't, because of the overall ratings. You can say what you want about overall don't matter, but it matters. Is the ovrl rating who dictates who starts or not in CFM. Also, who is cut, who makes the team, who's signed in FA. All about overall rating. Until it does not makes sense, i can't use this roster. The rookies will enter the league as superstars too, the majority of then. How can i play with this roster, this way? Oh, and as a Bills fan, i can't accept Eric Wood as our best player. Sorry. It doesn't makes any sense. Please convince me about this roster, because i'm tired to re-rate all the roster before start my CCM

Can you please explain more as to why you think the OVR ratings don't make sense? Is it because you have been conditioned to think that anything under an 80 OVR is useless? Have you tried the rosters out in-game?

The big problem here is that a lot of people are EMOTIONALLY invested into ratings, especially the OVR and SPD ratings. Eric Wood is the highest graded player on your team. Be happy that you have 4 players rated over 80 (typically among the best in the league). When you take your Bills' ratings and compare them to other teams, I would think that you would be quite happy. Some teams don't have any players rated that highly.

People need to break their EA conditioning and emotional connection to think objectively about these ratings.

# 144 fhs2 @ 08/21/15 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCEBB2001


	Can you please explain more as to why you think the OVR ratings don't make sense? Is it because you have been conditioned to think that anything under an 80 OVR is useless? Have you tried the rosters out in-game? The big problem here is that a lot of people are EMOTIONALLY invested into ratings, especially the OVR and SPD ratings. Eric Wood is the highest graded player on your team. Be happy that you have 4 players rated over 80 (typically among the best in the league). When you take your Bills' ratings and compare them to other teams, I would think that you would be quite happy. Some teams don't have any players rated that highly. People need to break their EA conditioning and emotional connection to think objectively about these ratings.

No, i don't care if the majority of the players are below 80, not talking about that.
First, i'm saying i can't use this roster on CCM. Rookies will come in and be better than everyone.

Second, one example. Every Bills fan love Eric Wood, but knowns he Isn't our best player. He Isn't even in th top 10. Also, he's an average center in the league. How in the world he's rated so high?
Another one, Cassel rated way higher than EJ. Not what their stats show. The list goes and goes.

My biggest problem is the iniability to use this roster in CCM. I can't even try it, because i'm sure i will like, but will be unable to play with it in CCM.

Oh, and one time i read about this roster, people saying to not care about the overall rating. No way to not care. That's what matters in starting lineups, contract negotiations, cuts, etc.

# 145 DCEBB2001 @ 08/21/15 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fhs2


	No, i don't care if the majority of the players are below 80, not talking about that. First, i'm saying i can't use this roster on CCM. Rookies will come in and be better than everyone. Second, one example. Every Bills fan love Eric Wood, but knowns he Isn't our best player. He Isn't even in th top 10. Also, he's an average center in the league. How in the world he's rated so high? Another one, Cassel rated way higher than EJ. Not what their stats show. The list goes and goes. My biggest problem is the iniability to use this roster in CCM. I can't even try it, because i'm sure i will like, but will be unable to play with it in CCM. Oh, and one time i read about this roster, people saying to not care about the overall rating. No way to not care. That's what matters in starting lineups, contract negotiations, cuts, etc.

Though I cannot disagree with the cfm issues, I do disagree with your assessment asserting that every bills fan knows that wood is not their best player. Fan bias and stats are taken out of the equation and these scouts disagree with you based upon the data.

# 146 bspring3 @ 08/21/15 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by neume1mb


	Just from this year's combine, Devin Funchess ran a 4.7 and Dorial Green-Beckham ran a 4.5, yet they have at the same speed. Sucks that my first 3 days of the game are going to be spent adjusting the roster.

Funchess ran a 4.49 at his pro day...probably the time that they are using for his rating.

# 147 fhs2 @ 08/21/15 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCEBB2001


	Though I cannot disagree with the cfm issues, I do disagree with your assessment asserting that every bills fan knows that wood is not their best player. Fan bias and stats are taken out of the equation and these scouts disagree with you based upon the data.

I respect you, but i known what i'm talking about. I can bet with you no Bills fan will say Wood is our best player. We love him, but knowns his limitations. If you asks Bills fans and peiple who follows their games it will be Dareus, Mario or Mccoy now. Some Kyle Williams too and Watkins a good QB away to be there.
When i saw Wood ratings, it makes less sense. Equally good on pass block and run block? No way! He's a good pass blocker who struggles on run blocking. Sorry, but i'm sure you don't used data to rate Wood this way.
Also, how in the world Brady is rated below Cassel and equal to EJ??? It's dumb.
To have ratings this dumb, i'd rather play with EA one who will work in CFM. Like i said, i would love to support a better rating system, but it needs to makes sense. Bedwardsroy was an example on nba 2k.

# 148 DCEBB2001 @ 08/22/15 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fhs2


	I respect you, but i known what i'm talking about. I can bet with you no Bills fan will say Wood is our best player. We love him, but knowns his limitations. If you asks Bills fans and peiple who follows their games it will be Dareus, Mario or Mccoy now. Some Kyle Williams too and Watkins a good QB away to be there. When i saw Wood ratings, it makes less sense. Equally good on pass block and run block? No way! He's a good pass blocker who struggles on run blocking. Sorry, but i'm sure you don't used data to rate Wood this way. Also, how in the world Brady is rated below Cassel and equal to EJ??? It's dumb. To have ratings this dumb, i'd rather play with EA one who will work in CFM. Like i said, i would love to support a better rating system, but it needs to makes sense. Bedwardsroy was an example on nba 2k.

The problem is that you are basing your argument on fan opinion. These ratings are based on the opinions of professional scouts. One of these groups is trained and paid to professionally observe the game, while the other is likely not. My bias and production is taken out of the equation entirely. Did you read the faq page? I am guessing not, because if you did, you would have read that #6 on that list applies to Brady - suspension hold. To me, fans are too emotionally invested in ratings, so they will be extremely biased. In addition fans will likely be less open to any evidence that goes against their fandom, an even larger issue.

My point, in the last attempt to address you in this matter, is that your biased fandom may be preventing you from a more realistic Madden experience. It is possible, however, that as soon as Madden 17, your only option for CFM may in fact be FBG rated rosters, so I urge you to do more research now.

Good luck.

# 149 Yukon46 @ 08/22/15 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCEBB2001


	My point, in the last attempt to address you in this matter, is that your biased fandom may be preventing you from a more realistic Madden experience. It is possible, however, that as soon as Madden 17, your only option for CFM may in fact be FBG rated rosters, so I urge you to do more research now. Good luck.

This is my thing... if you wanna talk about it.

I just dont understand why your rating system has to be so far off of the "general population's" thought pattern.

I love the idea of ratings based on "real" data, but why wont it work within Madden's system ?

When I step back and look at it.... this is what I see

Madden uses basically the 60-99 scale. All people relate, from basic life. Our whole upbringing through school's teach us that scale. A-B-C-D-F...

FBG scale is like 50-89 (with a sprinkling above and below those marks)
The ones below 50, prolly wont make a roster. The ones above are deemed Gods.

I just dont see why you would make a rating system, that does not work within the system you are rating it for.

I am a firm believer that we dont need lower ratings...

We need accurate ratings.

FBG's are no more spread out than Madden's, they are just implemented on a lower scale.

I like all the info FBG has about scouting and grades.

But why cant those be translated into ratings the use the 60-99 scale ??

FBG is basically using a 39 point window (50-89) for a majority of it's rated players. (60-99 is a 39 point window too)

This will also lead into building a rating system that also works within what the game itself creates via CFM draft's.

I just dont understand..... I want the right Data, but I want it to be usable within the system it is for.

I mean, unless Madden totally changes the whole system within the game..... Scale.....XP progression.....salaries.......drafteess.....anima tions

I just dont see the point.....

When in my mind I think you could make FBG scouted, accurate rated players, that work with Madden's 60-99 scale.

# 150 fhs2 @ 08/22/15 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCEBB2001


	The problem is that you are basing your argument on fan opinion. These ratings are based on the opinions of professional scouts. One of these groups is trained and paid to professionally observe the game, while the other is likely not. My bias and production is taken out of the equation entirely. Did you read the faq page? I am guessing not, because if you did, you would have read that #6 on that list applies to Brady - suspension hold. To me, fans are too emotionally invested in ratings, so they will be extremely biased. In addition fans will likely be less open to any evidence that goes against their fandom, an even larger issue. My point, in the last attempt to address you in this matter, is that your biased fandom may be preventing you from a more realistic Madden experience. It is possible, however, that as soon as Madden 17, your only option for CFM may in fact be FBG rated rosters, so I urge you to do more research now. Good luck.

Man, how it can be about my " biased fandom" if i'm saying that i love Wood just like every Bills fan, but even we known he's at the best a above average Center and obviously not our best player? . Also, every scout who would rate Wood, would never give him an equally rating on pass and run block. It's pretty clear to everyone who watch him play, scouts, midia, fans, that he struggles on run block.

I have no problem is those become the official ratings in madden 17. Then it will work in CFM and will be fine. Maybe they even makes the game play better. But those errors like in Eric Wood case are really bad, just like the actual ones in EA ratings.

Also Brady is suspended, so his rating go down? C'mon.

# 151 Ueauvan @ 08/26/15 06:48 AM

anyone have a sheet for free agents?

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 78Next »

More Links

Full Spreadsheet of Madden NFL 16 Player Ratings Available Now