Full Spreadsheet of Madden NFL 16 Player Ratings Available Now

[fhs2]

Quote: Originally Posted by SECElit3

8 pages of concerns, complaints, and arguing: It is extremely important to the future of the franchise for everyone who cares to get the word out about the FBG system. It is quite frankly the best and most true to life rating system ever created. Get the word out to Rex and other decision makers that this system needs to be a part of Madden going forward. Support our roster! Download it, use it, and talk about it! Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I really want to like fbg system, but can't, because of the overall ratings. You can say what you want about overall don't matter, but it matters. Is the ovrl rating who dictates who starts or not in CFM. Also, who is cut, who makes the team, who's signed in FA. All about overall rating. Until it does not makes sense, i can't use this roster. The rookies will enter the league as superstars too, the majority of then. How can i play with this roster, this way?
Oh, and as a Bills fan, i can't accept Eric Wood as our best player. Sorry. It doesn't makes any sense.
Please convince me about this roster, because i'm tired to re-rate all the roster before start my CCM

[DCEBB2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by fhs2

I really want to like fbg system, but can't, because of the overall ratings. You can say what you want about overall don't matter, but it matters. Is the ovrl rating who dictates who starts or not in CFM. Also, who is cut, who makes the team, who's signed in FA. All about overall rating. Until it does not makes sense, i can't use this roster. The rookies will enter the league as superstars too, the majority of then. How can i play with this roster, this way? Oh, and as a Bills fan, i can't accept Eric Wood as our best player. Sorry. It doesn't makes any sense. Please convince me about this roster, because i'm tired to re-rate all the roster before start my CCM

Can you please explain more as to why you think the OVR ratings don't make sense? Is it because you have been conditioned to think that anything under an 80 OVR is useless? Have you tried the rosters out in-game?

The big problem here is that a lot of people are EMOTIONALLY invested into ratings, especially the OVR and SPD ratings. Eric Wood is the highest graded player on your team. Be happy that you have 4 players rated over 80 (typically among the best in the league). When you take your Bills' ratings and compare them to other teams, I would think that you would be quite happy. Some teams don't have any players rated that highly.

People need to break their EA conditioning and emotional connection to think objectively about these ratings.

[fhs2]

Quote: Originally Posted by DCEBB2001

Can you please explain more as to why you think the OVR ratings don't make sense? Is it because you have been conditioned to think that anything under an 80 OVR is useless? Have you tried the rosters out in-game? The big problem here is that a lot of people are EMOTIONALLY invested into ratings, especially the OVR and SPD ratings. Eric Wood is the highest graded player on your team. Be happy that you have 4 players rated over 80 (typically among the best in the league). When you take your Bills' ratings and compare them to other teams, I would think that you would be quite happy. Some teams don't have any players rated that highly. People need to break their EA conditioning and emotional connection to think objectively about these ratings.

No, i don't care if the majority of the players are below 80, not talking about that.
First, i'm saying i can't use this roster on CCM. Rookies will come in and be better than everyone.

Second, one example. Every Bills fan love Eric Wood, but knowns he Isn't our best player. He Isn't even in th top 10. Also, he's an average center in the league. How in the world he's rated so high?
Another one, Cassel rated way higher than EJ. Not what their stats show. The list goes and goes.

My biggest problem is the iniability to use this roster in CCM. I can't even try it, because i'm sure i will like, but will be unable to play with it in CCM.

Oh, and one time i read about this roster, people saying to not care about the overall rating. No way to not care. That's what matters in starting lineups, contract negotiations, cuts, etc.

[DCEBB2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by fhs2

No, i don't care if the majority of the players are below 80, not talking about that. First, i'm saying i can't use this roster on CCM. Rookies will come in and be better than everyone. Second, one example. Every Bills fan love Eric Wood, but knowns he Isn't our best player. He Isn't even in th top 10. Also, he's an average center in the league. How in the world he's rated so high? Another one, Cassel rated way higher than EJ. Not what their stats show. The list goes and goes. My biggest problem is the iniability to use this roster in CCM. I can't even try it, because i'm sure i will like, but will be unable to play with it in CCM. Oh, and one time i read about this roster, people saying to not care about the overall rating. No way to not care. That's what matters in starting lineups, contract negotiations, cuts, etc.

Though I cannot disagree with the cfm issues, I do disagree with your assessment asserting that every bills fan knows that wood is not their best player. Fan bias and stats are taken out of the equation and these scouts disagree with you based upon the data.

[neume1mb]

Just from this year's combine, Devin Funchess ran a 4.7 and Dorial Green-Beckham ran a 4.5, yet they have at the same speed.




Sucks that my first 3 days of the game are going to be spent adjusting the roster.

[bspring3]

Quote: Originally Posted by neume1mb

Just from this year's combine, Devin Funchess ran a 4.7 and Dorial Green-Beckham ran a 4.5, yet they have at the same speed. Sucks that my first 3 days of the game are going to be spent adjusting the roster.

Funchess ran a 4.49 at his pro day...probably the time that they are using for his rating.

[fhs2]

Quote: Originally Posted by DCEBB2001

Though I cannot disagree with the cfm issues, I do disagree with your assessment asserting that every bills fan knows that wood is not their best player. Fan bias and stats are taken out of the equation and these scouts disagree with you based upon the data.

I respect you, but i known what i'm talking about. I can bet with you no Bills fan will say Wood is our best player. We love him, but knowns his limitations. If you asks Bills fans and peiple who follows their games it will be Dareus, Mario or Mccoy now. Some Kyle Williams too and Watkins a good QB away to be there.
When i saw Wood ratings, it makes less sense. Equally good on pass block and run block? No way! He's a good pass blocker who struggles on run blocking. Sorry, but i'm sure you don't used data to rate Wood this way.
Also, how in the world Brady is rated below Cassel and equal to EJ??? It's dumb.
To have ratings this dumb, i'd rather play with EA one who will work in CFM. Like i said, i would love to support a better rating system, but it needs to makes sense. Bedwardsroy was an example on nba 2k.

[DCEBB2001]

Quote: Originally Posted by fhs2

I respect you, but i known what i'm talking about. I can bet with you no Bills fan will say Wood is our best player. We love him, but knowns his limitations. If you asks Bills fans and peiple who follows their games it will be Dareus, Mario or Mccoy now. Some Kyle Williams too and Watkins a good QB away to be there. When i saw Wood ratings, it makes less sense. Equally good on pass block and run block? No way! He's a good pass blocker who struggles on run blocking. Sorry, but i'm sure you don't used data to rate Wood this way. Also, how in the world Brady is rated below Cassel and equal to EJ??? It's dumb. To have ratings this dumb, i'd rather play with EA one who will work in CFM. Like i said, i would love to support a better rating system, but it needs to makes sense. Bedwardsroy was an example on nba 2k.

The problem is that you are basing your argument on fan opinion. These ratings are based on the opinions of professional scouts. One of these groups is trained and paid to professionally observe the game, while the other is likely not. My bias and production is taken out of the equation entirely. Did you read the faq page? I am guessing not, because if you did, you would have read that #6 on that list applies to Brady - suspension hold. To me, fans are too emotionally invested in ratings, so they will be extremely biased. In addition fans will likely be less open to any evidence that goes against their fandom, an even larger issue.

My point, in the last attempt to address you in this matter, is that your biased fandom may be preventing you from a more realistic Madden experience. It is possible, however, that as soon as Madden 17, your only option for CFM may in fact be FBG rated rosters, so I urge you to do more research now.

Good luck.