Home
MLB 15 The Show News Post


This week's MLB 15: The Show livestream was a long one, clocking in at 1 hour, 45 minutes, so if you don't want to sit through the whole thing, here are all of the highlights from Thursday night's Twitch show:

Year-To-Year Saves
  • You will be able to use licensed equipment if you import your Road To The Show player from MLB 14.
  • It only took four seconds to load an MLB 14 save into MLB 15.
  • Save files from the PlayStation 3 and PlayStation Vita versions of MLB 14 must be uploaded to Sony's cloud, and from there, they can be downloaded into your PlayStation 4 copy of MLB 15: The Show.
  • All of MLB 15's new facial scans and skin tones will be automatically applied to imported MLB 14 roster files. Players' attribute ratings, though, will remain the same as they were on your old file.
Franchise Mode
  • All teams' farm systems are randomly generated whenever you start your Franchise.
  • You can still edit any player's attributes whenever you want from inside Franchise/Season mode.
  • Any player's contract can be edited, but you must make your changes before you begin a Franchise or Season. You cannot edit contracts once a Franchise/Season is in progress. You are able to adjust contract length and contract value.
  • You can no longer cheat the system and lock-up all of your young talents to cheap, long-term contracts. Young players will be expecting a significant pay raise in their prime years, if you choose to sign them to a long-term deal.
  • All draft picks and minor leaguers can only be signed to one-year deals.
  • You cannot extend a player's contract during the season. You must wait until the off-season to start negotiating.
  • Your team's owner will now give you two goals that you must complete if you want to keep your job. The first goal is easier, and it will only focus on that particular season (for example, finishing over .500, or winning your division). The second goal is tougher, and it must be accomplished before your three-year contract expires (for instance, winning a Divisional Series, or capturing a World Series championship). Your owner's expectations will be based on the team's budget and roster talent.
  • If you're importing a Franchise save file from MLB 14, then you'll begin in the first year of your three-year contract, regardless of where you're at on the 20XX calendar.
  • Your GM Rating will always start at an average "C," and it can either move up or down, depending on your team's performance, and whether or not you achieve your owner's goals.
  • If you perform well with a low-budget team, then a big-budget team might offer you a job at the end of the season.
  • The contract system can be turned off entirely, if you prefer, which allows you to stay with your selected club for the entire length of the Franchise, regardless of your team's performance.
  • Whenever you put a player on the trading block, a new "trade value" bar will show you how much each team in the league covets your player. Teams looking to make a playoff push will be more interested in read-to-play veterans, while rebuilding franchises will be looking to acquire promising young prospects.
  • A new "suggest trades" button will make it easier to find offers that the game is likely to accept.
  • The trade logic has been tweaked so that there are more straight-up, one-for-one trades and less lopsided, multi-player trades.
  • Trades remain limited to just two teams per transaction. Three-team and four-team trades are something that Sony San Diego is considering adding for future editions of The Show.
  • Simulating games on the calender is now significantly faster.
  • You will see more performance-based player progression this year, but the system is still predominantly governed by a player's age and his potential rating. The potential rating can change slightly over time based on your on-field performance.
  • The age point where players start to naturally regress has been pushed back for MLB 15, and you can even stave off regression for a bit by performing at a high level in old age.
  • Teams' budgets will grow/shrink over the years based on each club's performance, but certain franchises that have a long history of being big spenders (like the Yankees) will continue to receive large budgets, even if they perennially underperform.
  • Your team can accept performance-based sponsorships to increase its budget. The sponsors' logos will only show-up on the score tickers and in the instant replay banners.
  • You can bring any of the retired legends into Franchise mode, if you want.
  • 10 minor league stadiums have been added on PlayStation 4. These fictional, unlicensed stadiums previously existed on PlayStation 3, but they now look much prettier on Sony's latest console.
Radio Show
  • The PlayStation 4 is the only system that will have the radio show this year, due to the huge amount of audio data it requires. There was not enough space to include it on the PlayStation 3 or PlayStation Vita.
  • Radio host Justin Allegri broadcasts minor league baseball and college football/basketball in real life.
  • Allegri mostly recaps box scores and stats, but he will also talk about any recent injuries, team transactions, career milestones, or impressive single-game accomplishments.
  • The radio show will keep playing while you move through the Franchise menus.
  • It will work in Road to the Show and Franchise, but if you listen to the radio show in RTTS, it will only talk about MLB events, and it won't mention anything that's happening in the minors.
  • Your created character can be mentioned on the radio show, but the news won't be slanted to make him the primary focus; the show just treats him like any other athlete.
  • Players without a recorded audio name are referred to by their jersey number, position, and team name.
Miscellaneous Notes
  • You can now select a specific month and time of day for exhibition games. These settings will affect the in-game lighting.
  • If you start a game at night, and it goes deep into extra innings, you will eventually see the sun rising in the A.M.
  • Users will have more control over their fielders this year, as they won't be locked into catch animations until much later in the ball's descent.
  • Starting pitchers' performance will begin to plummet at 20 percent stamina; relief pitchers start struggling at 40 percent stamina.

Game: MLB 15 The ShowReader Score: 9/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS Vita / PS3 / PS4Votes for game: 31 - View All
MLB 15 The Show Videos
Member Comments
# 121 Bobhead @ 03/02/15 06:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaSLAB
There's been 1 relocation of a MLB franchise (Nats) in the last 43 year... Let that sink in.

htcONE [M8] 5.0 | Tapatalk
What?

Miami Marlins? Atlanta Braves?
 
# 122 Ghost Of The Year @ 03/02/15 06:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobhead
What?

Miami Marlins? Atlanta Braves?
The Marlins didn't actually relocate any more than the California/LA/Anaheim Angels. The Braves left Milwaukee in '65? 50 years.
 
# 123 bigwill33 @ 03/02/15 06:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobhead
What?

Miami Marlins? Atlanta Braves?
The Marlins were an expansion team and not a relocation and Atlanta moved from Milwaukee in 1966. 49 years ago.
 
# 124 nemesis04 @ 03/02/15 06:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost Of The Year
Yeah, I personally don't want to relocate any current team into a future, fantasy location, but I do wish MLB would let the Rangers be moved back to DC & only DC. The Natinals back to Montreal & only Montreal. The Twins back to DC & only DC. The A's back to KC & Philly & only KC & Philly. The Braves back to Milwaukee & Boston & only Milwaukee & Boston. For classic created roster reasons.
That is a lot of "& only's"!
 
# 125 Ghost Of The Year @ 03/02/15 06:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nemesis04
That is a lot of "& only's"!
I have a special way of hammering home a point
 
# 126 thaSLAB @ 03/02/15 06:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobhead
What?

Miami Marlins? Atlanta Braves?
1. That was not a relocation. 2. It's always good to check your math.



htcONE [M8] 5.0 | Tapatalk
 
# 127 Bobhead @ 03/02/15 06:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost Of The Year
The Marlins didn't actually relocate any more than the California/LA/Anaheim Angels. The Braves left Milwaukee in '65? 50 years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwill33
The Marlins were an expansion team and not a relocation and Atlanta moved from Milwaukee in 1966. 49 years ago.
The Marlins moved to Miami (their old stadium was not in Miami). The Atlanta Braves are in the process of moving out of Atlanta. In both cases, the team moved from one location to another. That's exactly what relocation means.

I don't really understand how this is debatable?

Unless by "relocation," Slab meant "relocation to another country."
 
# 128 Ghost Of The Year @ 03/02/15 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobhead
The Marlins moved to Miami (their old stadium was not in Miami). The Atlanta Braves are in the process of moving out of Atlanta. In both cases, the team moved from one location to another. That's exactly what relocation means.

I don't really understand how this is debatable?

Unless by "relocation," Slab meant "relocation to another country."
In that case the Braves also relocated in '97?
 
# 129 HozAndMoose @ 03/02/15 07:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobhead
The Marlins moved to Miami (their old stadium was not in Miami). The Atlanta Braves are in the process of moving out of Atlanta. In both cases, the team moved from one location to another. That's exactly what relocation means.

I don't really understand how this is debatable?

Unless by "relocation," Slab meant "relocation to another country."
Yes they are technically relocating. But its not like when the Expos moved to DC. The teams are still going to be called the same thing and will still be in about the same area.
 
# 130 bigwill33 @ 03/02/15 07:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobhead
The Marlins moved to Miami (their old stadium was not in Miami). The Atlanta Braves are in the process of moving out of Atlanta. In both cases, the team moved from one location to another. That's exactly what relocation means.

I don't really understand how this is debatable?

Unless by "relocation," Slab meant "relocation to another country."
That is called changing venues and building a new stadium.

Relocation means the team leaves the current area entirely.

I think you are going to be pretty much alone in your definition and viewpoint on the meanings here (or anywhere else).

There are certain costs and applications that must be acquired for a team to even consider a relocation in sports. Securing a brand new facility and moving into that is a far less intensive endeavor.
 
# 131 SoxFan01605 @ 03/02/15 07:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobhead
The Marlins moved to Miami (their old stadium was not in Miami). The Atlanta Braves are in the process of moving out of Atlanta. In both cases, the team moved from one location to another. That's exactly what relocation means.

I don't really understand how this is debatable?

Unless by "relocation," Slab meant "relocation to another country."

You are technically right (as in the team is in a different location than before), but missing the point entirely.

Do you really think people asking for relocation are talking about moving from one suburb to the next?

I can only imagine the outrage when SCEA announces all new franchise feature for 16: Relocation! and people find out that, while you can't actually move your franchise with any significance, you can negotiate a better financial deal by switching to a different suburb.

This really seems like arguing semantics just for the sake of it.
 
# 132 Heroesandvillains @ 03/02/15 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HozAndMoose
Yes they are technically relocating. But its not like when the Expos moved to DC. The teams are still going to be called the same thing and will still be in about the same area.
This conversation is about people wanting to build a stadium, right?

So what difference does it make if the team moves across country, to a new country or even across town. Let alone change their name.

These examples all involve new stadiums which is what CAS people want (Note: I personally could care less about the feature, myself. It happens so infrequently in real life that I personally would find it a waste of resources).
 
# 133 TMalone2010 @ 03/02/15 07:21 PM
It be cool if you could make your franchise like the old college hoops 2k8 dynasties where it was like a career mode and to start out you could only use struggling teams and would have to work your way up to the Giants of the league
 
# 134 thaSLAB @ 03/02/15 07:21 PM
So by that logic, every team that's built a new stadium is a relocation. Or the Angels changing their name 20 times lol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost Of The Year
Yeah, I personally don't want to relocate any current team into a future, fantasy location, but I do wish MLB would let the Rangers be moved back to DC & only DC. The Natinals back to Montreal & only Montreal. The Twins back to DC & only DC. The A's back to KC & Philly & only KC & Philly. The Braves back to Milwaukee & Boston & only Milwaukee & Boston. For classic created roster reasons.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nemesis04
That is a lot of "& only's"!
Lol, I was thinking the same thing... interestingly, as far as relocations go, Montreal is the only city that has lost a franchise, and not got another later.

htcONE [M8] 5.0 | Tapatalk
 
# 135 Bobhead @ 03/02/15 07:22 PM
Sorry for dragging this out, this will be last post on it..

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwill33
That is called changing venues and building a new stadium.

Relocation means the team leaves the current area entirely.

No changing venues and building a stadium is what the Mets and Yankees did. The new stadium is walking distance to the old.

The Braves and Marlins are in a entirely new neighborhood, in an entirely new zip code, with an entirely new Mayor. Both teams moved (or are moving) at least 25 minutes away. That means an entirely new segment of people to market to. There are people that will no longer attend Braves/Marlins games, because the stadium is way too far away. There are also people that will now attend them, because the stadium is far closer.

It's exactly the same dynamic as with the Nationals. The same class of economic and demographic analysis required. All three teams had to weigh the risks and rewards with the new market and evaluate the new location.

I know I come off as anal here but when you consider the above it's quite inaccurate to say only one team has relocated in the last whatever years, and it's equally inaccurate to imply that only the Nationals' case required any "relocation-type thinking".

The subject at hand is someone asking for relocation in MLB The Show. They didn't ask for relocation to a different time zone, or a different country. Just relocation.
 
# 136 Bullit @ 03/02/15 07:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMalone2010
It be cool if you could make your franchise like the old college hoops 2k8 dynasties where it was like a career mode and to start out you could only use struggling teams and would have to work your way up to the Giants of the league
That is exactly the way I was going to play one of my franchise's. I am going to pick the worst rated team and start a franchise with GM mode on. Then I will try to work my up to the number one team. Think it will be a lot of fun and hoping I will play as some teams I would never play.

Baseball is Better
 
# 137 thaSLAB @ 03/02/15 07:36 PM
And to think, I've been rooting for the Auburn Hills Pistons & Pontiac Lions all this time!

Anyway, no more derailing from me either...

htcONE [M8] 5.0 | Tapatalk
 
# 138 Heroesandvillains @ 03/02/15 07:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaSLAB
So by that logic, every team that's built a new stadium is a relocation. Or the Angels changing their name 20 times lol.



Lol, I was thinking the same thing... interestingly, as far as relocations go, Montreal is the only city that has lost a franchise, and not got another later.

htcONE [M8] 5.0 | Tapatalk
Isn't this just baseball terminology semantics?

People that want create-a-stadium want to be able to create a stadium, regardless of where the team moves to and what the team's intention is.
 
# 139 Ghost Of The Year @ 03/02/15 07:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heroesandvillains
Isn't this just baseball terminology semantics?

People that want create-a-stadium want to be able to create a stadium, regardless of where the team moves to and what the team's intention is.
I'm thinking create-a-stadium & reloctaion are two very separate ideas.
MLB has (or should not have) any issue with SCEA adding CAS.
MLB is not going to let relocation in the Show anytime soon.
I can already technically relocate the Braves back to Boston or Milwaukee by choosing to play games in Fenway or Miller Park. I just can't change the name back to Boston Braves, which is what I really want.
 
# 140 SoxFan01605 @ 03/02/15 07:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobhead
Sorry for dragging this out, this will be last post on it..




No changing venues and building a stadium is what the Mets and Yankees did. The new stadium is walking distance to the old.

The Braves and Marlins are in a entirely new neighborhood, in an entirely new zip code, with an entirely new Mayor. Both teams moved (or are moving) at least 25 minutes away. That means an entirely new segment of people to market to. There are people that will no longer attend Braves/Marlins games, because the stadium is way too far away. There are also people that will now attend them, because the stadium is far closer.

It's exactly the same dynamic as with the Nationals. The same class of economic and demographic analysis required. All three teams had to weigh the risks and rewards with the new market and evaluate the new location.

I know I come off as anal here but when you consider the above it's quite inaccurate to say only one team has relocated in the last whatever years, and it's equally inaccurate to imply that only the Nationals' case required any "relocation-type thinking".

The subject at hand is someone asking for relocation in MLB The Show. They didn't ask for relocation to a different time zone, or a different country. Just relocation.
Moving from to a neighboring city/county could possibly mean a new segment to market to, but the overall demographic breakdowns typically stay the same when you are talking major metro areas (meaning that while the attending fan base may or may not change based on specific locale, the general fan base and market stays in tact). It's not a total change in market the same way a move from Montreal to DC is.

The analysis you speak of is different in that, one move is made in consideration of the of the current base while the other is made with consideration to building a new one.

I'm not telling you how to feel about it, only how it is typically viewed. You seem to be thinking of it in far more depth than even these leagues do. Otherwise, teams like the Dallas Cowboys would have a vastly different team history page...lol. In any case, I don't think a couple of minor examples helps those advocating for a relocation/stadium creator feature regardless of which way we all view them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heroesandvillains
Isn't this just baseball terminology semantics?

People that want create-a-stadium want to be able to create a stadium, regardless of where the team moves to and what the team's intention is.
I think thaSlab's original point was more just to highlight potential rationale as to why relocation might not be a priority feature for SCEA, as it's not a common occurrence.

Further, while relocation and CAS fans may have overlapping interests, each can be achieved without the other. (oops...didn't see that this last bit was addressed above).
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.