Madden NFL 15 News Post

Madden NFL 15 Top 5 Quarterbacks

02:15 PM - July 22, 2014 by Steve_OS

EA Sports has just released the top 5 quarterbacks for Madden NFL 15.

#1 Peyton Manning - 98 Overall
#2 Aaron Rodgers - 98 Overall
#3 Drew Brees - 96 Overall
#4 Russell Wilson - 93 Overall
#5 Tom Brady - 93 Overall

Here is a look at the release date schedule for the remaining ratings.

Mon, July 21 – Top 10 Overall Rookies (Released)
Tues, July 22 – Top 5 Overall QBs (Released)
Wed, July 23 – Top 5 Overall RBs
Thurs, July 24 – Top 5 Overall WRs/Top 5 Overall TEs
Fri, July 25 – Top 5 Overall OL Players
Sat, July 26 – Top 5 Overall DEs
Sun, July 27 – Top 5 Overall DTs
Mon, July 28 – Top 5 Overall LBs
Tues, July 29 – Top 5 Overall CBs
Wed, July 30 – Top 5 Overall Safeties
Thurs, July 31 – Top 5 Overall Special Teams
Fri, Aug 1 – Top 10 Overall Players/Full AFC & NFC North Ratings
Sat, Aug 2 – Full AFC & NFC South Ratings
Sun, Aug 3 – Full AFC & NFC East Ratings
Mon, Aug 4 – Full AFC & NFC West Ratings
Tues, Aug 5 – Ratings Recap

Madden NFL 15 screenshot gallery - Click to view

Game: Madden NFL 15Reader Score: 6.5/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / PS4 / Xbox 360 / Xbox OneVotes for game: 42 - View All

Madden NFL 15 Videos

Member Comments

# 121 Hoops737 @ 07/23/14 12:15 AM

How is Peyton not a 99?

Greatest statistical season of all-time...c'mon man!

# 122 brent3419 @ 07/23/14 01:29 AM

Manning, Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Roethlisberger, Flacco, Rivers, Manning, Luck, Ryan should be the top 10. Wilson should be in the top 15 sure but 93 with Brady?? hell no!..

# 123 Godgers12 @ 07/23/14 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoops737


	How is Peyton not a 99? Greatest statistical season of all-time...c'mon man!

Umm, because he's not better than Aaron Rodgers?

# 124 ggsimmonds @ 07/23/14 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakeness23


	Russell Wilson should be nowhere close to the 4th highest QB in the league. He's good, not elite. His TEAM was elite. They could've won the Super Bowl with just about every other starting QB in the league last year. Brady, Luck, and Newton are just 3 that should be rated much higher than him. He should be around 80, but no EA has to try and satisfy everyone which skews and ruins all of the ratings.

Wait...what? Seems odd seeing his name in the discussion.

**looks at posters avatar**

Oh nevermind, carry on.

# 125 jpdavis82 @ 07/23/14 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by totalpoop


	im not sure if it's just me but it irks me that madden continually puts an elbow band on aaron rodgers. never have i seen him ever wear one, sure he wears a forearm band occasionally but never something wrapped on his elbow.

I tweeted this to Kane and Aaron Rodgers actually favorited it😃

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

# 126 friscob @ 07/23/14 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brent3419


	Manning, Brady, Brees, Rodgers, Roethlisberger, Flacco, Rivers, Manning, Luck, Ryan should be the top 10. Wilson should be in the top 15 sure but 93 with Brady?? hell no!..

Flacco lol. Hell of a sb run he had, other than that hes been avg to below avg his entire career. And eli in the top 10 is hilarious

1a Brady
1b Rodgers
3. Peyton
4. Brees
5. Big Ben
6. Matt Ryan
7. Rivers
8. Romo
9. Russ
10. Cam/Luck

# 127 mrprice33 @ 07/23/14 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSaints7


	hahaha. Sloppy with the ball? You clearly don't watch NFL. He's thrown for 5000+ yards 3 years in a row. 39 TDs last season and only 12 interceptions. He doesn't have an argument to put Wilson with any of the 3. Rodgers was the one with just 17 touchdowns last year.

2013 and 2011 saw Brees in the top 10 in INT rate.

2012 and 2010 saw him in the 20s in INT rate.

And...uhhhh, Rodgers played in 9 games last year. Cool avatar though bro.

# 128 mrprice33 @ 07/23/14 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bucky60


	You would need to factor in, somehow, the number of drive killing drops that reduce the # of offensive plays for your team. That would add completions, TD's etc.

Perhaps, but as a whole, you're talking about less than 1 per game more compared to league average. Without the precise context of every drop, it's impossible to say. You'd also have to then do the same thing for every other QB, and I'd imagine all numbers would rise a little bit. He may wind up in the same place, roughly.

# 129 mrprice33 @ 07/23/14 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bucky60


	I think a team that has a lot of drops wouldn't roughly end up the same as a team with few drops. 1 per game more? What, completions? TD? I think it would come out to more than 1 completion.

They had 13 more drops over a 16 game season than the league average. It's less than 1 per game.

# 130 underdog13 @ 07/23/14 01:13 PM

Remember Guys speed inflates the qb's OVR.

# 131 Cavicchi @ 07/23/14 01:18 PM

Lots of dismay shot Wilson's way--hey, that rhymes!

Well, which elite QB had a worse receiver core? which elite QB had a worse offensive line? The Seahawks offensive line is much better at run blocking than pass blocking.

# 132 Bootzilla @ 07/23/14 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bucky60


	One thing you all are missing is which QB's were still in there rookie contract. To really know how good the QB is, you have to wait for the QB to eat up much more of the salary cap where that extra money can't go into team depth. That's when you find the true value of the QB.

I agree that teams with good young quarterbacks on rookie contracts allow them to potentially field more talent around them.

However, Manning eats up a lot of cap space but according to CBS sports top 100 players in the NFL, the Broncos have the most players in the top 100 (Manning, Clady, Vasquez, D. Thomas, V. Miller, D. Ware, Talib, Ward). So, it is possible to field a strong team even if your quarterback has a big cap number.

My premise is this. The extra athleticism that Wilson, Kap, Luck, Rodgers, Cam have helps them against elite defenses. So, against most teams Brady and Manning will produce better numbers than a lot of these guys but, I may take those other guys vs the elite defenses.

Again, the examples I used were Brady vs the Broncos in the AFC championship and Wilson vs those same Broncos in the Superbowl. Wilson converted more 1st downs. Kept drives alive. And I'm sorry but Doug Baldwin and Golden Tate aren't any better than Edelman and Amendola. The extra time Wilson afforded them vs what Brady could provide was really the diffference. Neither the Hawks or Pats could generate a running game.

# 133 Yuss @ 07/23/14 02:01 PM

Russell Wilson 407 ATT 63.1 3,357 26 TD 9 Int
Tom Brady 628 ATT 60.5 25 TD 11 INT

# 134 charter04 @ 07/23/14 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D0WN N DIRTY


	you guys are crazy if you think brady should be higher.. he is on a down hill slide.. why do you think they drafted a qb..I dont agree with wilson being that high he should be right around 90.. luck should be higher than him.

All teams draft QB's. They didn't draft a first round QB. Manning just has his best year as far as stats. He's supposed to be going down as far as age. He's older than Brady. I want to see how this year goes before I say he's going down. He had 99 QB rating the last 8 games. So he got better as the year went.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

# 135 oneamongthefence @ 07/23/14 03:12 PM

These are just base rosters. The ratings fluctuate. It Brady lights it up, he'll get a boost. If Russel Wilson bombs, he'll drop. These aren't set in stone. They'll change as the season evolves to reflect how they do. Not a big deal to me.

# 136 underdog13 @ 07/23/14 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirk5049ers


	Russell Wilson is a 93??? Are the ratings guys smoking crack??? Look at his stats for 2013. They're on par with Kaepernick's, not Brady.

Don't look at ovr. Look at individual ratings

# 137 m1ke_nyc @ 07/23/14 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by underdog13


	Don't look at ovr. Look at individual ratings

Im with you on your comment but Russell Wilson isnt a top 5 QB, hes not even close to being on those guys level. Thats the issue here. The way they calculate ratings has to change if Russell Wilson generates the same overall as Brady, because hes no where near the player that Brady is.

# 138 underdog13 @ 07/23/14 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratedmoney


	The way they calculate ratings has to change if Russell Wilson generates the same overall as Brady, because hes no where near the player that Brady is.

Nowhere near? Well thats a stretch. Sure Brady is better than Wilson but if Brady is elite Wilson is very good.

# 139 oneamongthefence @ 07/23/14 06:10 PM

Wasn't Brady about a 95 In Madden after his second season as a starter? I think Wilson is a better athlete overall. He's just as accurate. The only thing he lacks is elite arm strength. I'm sure when Madden 03 came out people were complaining how it was a travesty he was higher rated than a Brett Favre. If Russel Wilson lights the league on fire with his arm, I can't help but imagine the rating czar telling everybody I told you so.

# 140 apollon42 @ 07/23/14 07:18 PM

They fixed Wilson's skin color but now they have Marshawn Lynch too light.

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 678 9 10 Next »

More Links

Madden NFL 15 Top 5 Quarterbacks