07:37 PM - June 8, 2011 by RynoAid
Hellisan, over at Tradition Sports Online, spent some time today documenting NCAA Football 12 team ratings and put together the info for all 120 teams, including prestige.
NCAA Football 12 News Post
07:37 PM - June 8, 2011 by RynoAidHellisan, over at Tradition Sports Online, spent some time today documenting NCAA Football 12 team ratings and put together the info for all 120 teams, including prestige.
NCAA Football 12 Videos
Member Comments
# 22
blkrptnt819 @ 06/08/11 09:13 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
I still dont understand how Miami is better then ND when we clearly out played them is the bowl game.
# 24
blkrptnt819 @ 06/08/11 09:26 PM
Miami should be a 4* as should TCU. Boise is a 4.5* but do to rounding go up. Prestige Stars 1-4 should take a year. A 5* should take 2 years and a 6* should take 3 after that. So with that being said to go from a 1-6* should take 8 years and that's still generous. PSU is a 5*, Texas definitely deserves to stay a 6*. UNC should be a 3*, Fresno should be a 3*.
|
|||||||||||||
|
Notre Dame got a top 10 recruiting class and get bumped down to a 5 star????
# 27
SlickRick11 @ 06/08/11 09:31 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 28
The JareBear @ 06/08/11 09:35 PM
Yeah, I see you're point. Fair enough.
Plus they let us edit rosters to our hearts content anyway
Plus they let us edit rosters to our hearts content anyway
# 29
wkukicksbutt @ 06/08/11 09:38 PM
Can't wait to start a 1-star Dynasty, plenty of teams to rebuild, of course I am selecting WKU, but plenty of options for others. Akron, EMU, NMSU, New Mex, UAB, San Jose St, UNT, Memphis, FAU, ULL, ULM, Utah St, Kent St, Ark St, MTSU, Idaho, FIU, Tulane, Washington St, WMU, and Army.
Ughh, Looks like a lot of overrated teams again. 
At least they got my Tigers(Auburn) right. Anyway can someone tell me why Alabama is A+? I posted this in the other thread before it was closed.
I really would like to know how they come up with these team ratings. Are they just guessing or are they using some kind of college football website or something. Some of this stuff just seems off. I know Bama is preseason no.2, but that doesn't mean they're an A+ team.
At least they got my Tigers(Auburn) right. Anyway can someone tell me why Alabama is A+? I posted this in the other thread before it was closed.
|
|||||||||
|
# 31
arsenal123gunners @ 06/08/11 09:42 PM
How does michigan get a B+ on defense? Their secondary was god awful last year
# 32
Noble Evildoer @ 06/08/11 09:43 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 33
The JareBear @ 06/08/11 09:44 PM
My theory is this....
EA obviously can't recreate the actual rosters since, well, they get freaking sued.
I think they just throw rosters together, focus on the key players, and fill in the blanks around them based on the school. Michigan is still a big name. Their D should be a C or C+ at the best but that just won't happen without custom rosters
EA obviously can't recreate the actual rosters since, well, they get freaking sued.
I think they just throw rosters together, focus on the key players, and fill in the blanks around them based on the school. Michigan is still a big name. Their D should be a C or C+ at the best but that just won't happen without custom rosters
B rating for Special Teams for Arkansas? Did EA do their homework?
# 35
Noble Evildoer @ 06/08/11 09:51 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 36
Nature_Boy @ 06/08/11 09:54 PM
South Carolina A A B+ B 4. Very pleased with South Carolina's ratings this year.
|
|||||||||||||
|
Very generous ratings to Virginia. I'm surprised to get a B overall. I was figuring a C+. B is very generous.
UCLA is really a 2* prestige? Wow! I have a hard time comparing UCLA to some of the other 2* prestige teams. I know they have struggled but still.
Looks like I'll use Akron again as my team to build up.
Why is Michigan still 5*? After their struggles with Rich Rod. They should have dropped to a 4*. It's a good job but realistically Michigan isn't the school or job it was before Rich Rod. Michigan didn't have their pick to anyone they wanted. I think their prestige has really fallen.
USC should be 5* max, possibly even 4*. They have struggled the past couple years and with all the NCAA penalties they aren't the superpower they were a few years ago. I understand USC is still a big name but they haven't had the success to be a 6*.
Florida State should be 4*. They've improved this past year but they've had so many mediocre seasons that they don't deserve that 5* rating.
Virginia should possibly be a 2* considering they have had 4 losing seasons in the past 5 seasons. It's pretty hard for me to argue for them to still be a 3*.
Miami should be 4* at the most. Just like Florida State they have struggled much too much to have them at 5* prestige.
Iowa 5*? Not sure what they've done to deserve that. Yes, they have had good seasons but I wouldn't think they have deserved to be given 5*.
The ratings seem slightly high for all teams. I'm not expecting any teams to be very dominate this year. I personally don't feel any of this year's teams deserve an A+ rating. It should be reserved for the best of the best teams.
UCLA is really a 2* prestige? Wow! I have a hard time comparing UCLA to some of the other 2* prestige teams. I know they have struggled but still.
Looks like I'll use Akron again as my team to build up.
Why is Michigan still 5*? After their struggles with Rich Rod. They should have dropped to a 4*. It's a good job but realistically Michigan isn't the school or job it was before Rich Rod. Michigan didn't have their pick to anyone they wanted. I think their prestige has really fallen.
USC should be 5* max, possibly even 4*. They have struggled the past couple years and with all the NCAA penalties they aren't the superpower they were a few years ago. I understand USC is still a big name but they haven't had the success to be a 6*.
Florida State should be 4*. They've improved this past year but they've had so many mediocre seasons that they don't deserve that 5* rating.
Virginia should possibly be a 2* considering they have had 4 losing seasons in the past 5 seasons. It's pretty hard for me to argue for them to still be a 3*.
Miami should be 4* at the most. Just like Florida State they have struggled much too much to have them at 5* prestige.
Iowa 5*? Not sure what they've done to deserve that. Yes, they have had good seasons but I wouldn't think they have deserved to be given 5*.
The ratings seem slightly high for all teams. I'm not expecting any teams to be very dominate this year. I personally don't feel any of this year's teams deserve an A+ rating. It should be reserved for the best of the best teams.
# 39
Bullet Sponge @ 06/08/11 10:09 PM
I usually just use a roster file that puts the actual names on players (FairdaleKings usually) but this year I might actually wait for one where the players are all rerated to more realistic levels.
# 40
ActLikeYouCrow @ 06/08/11 10:28 PM
i agree with the sentiment that noone should be an A+, but the team ratings/grades dont necessarily make sense in comparision with the individual player ratings. i dont know about boise being one of the top 5 offenses from a rating perspective after losing their two starting wr's. miami still has talent, but lost some guys to the draft. hard to justify an A- on offense when you dont have a skill player back who was all conference.
seems odd that the 4 teams with at least A- on offense and defense are ranked no.1, no.2, no.28 and no.34
seems odd that the 4 teams with at least A- on offense and defense are ranked no.1, no.2, no.28 and no.34
Post A Comment
Working...