Madden 2010 News Post

Madden NFL 10: Chicago Bears Ratings (ESPN Videogames)

12:35 PM - June 8, 2009 by iamemmittsmith

ESPN Videogames will be posting player ratings for Madden NFL 10, on a team by team basis, starting with the NFC North, and the Chicago Bears.

Quote:


	"Starting today, ESPN Video Games is unveiling the "Madden NFL 10" ratings, highlighting a division each week and revealing a team a day. First up, the NFC North and the Chicago Bears."

Game: Madden NFL 10Reader Score: 7.5/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Wii / Xbox 360Votes for game: 76 - View All

Madden NFL 10 Videos

Member Comments

# 121 fcb-santana @ 06/09/09 12:55 AM

I believe Tommie Harris' rating has gone down in each Madden since 06. And I wouldn't want a player that keeps getting injured season after season.

It is hard to come up with a rating for a player that can't stay on the field.

# 122 cowboyscowboys @ 06/09/09 12:55 AM

Al Harris 90 Overall = Overrated he should be an (86 tops) His 07 seasons was crap and 08 he was hurt (spleen) played great upon return then the last 4 weeks of the year fell apart.

# 123 fcb-santana @ 06/09/09 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cowboyscowboys


	Al Harris 90 Overall = Overrated he should be an (86 tops) His 07 seasons was crap and 08 he was hurt (spleen) played great upon return then the last 4 weeks of the year fell apart.

Harris went to the Pro Bowl in 07. He had 5 sacks in 08, same as 06 when he went to the Pro Bowl.

He is still one of the best DTs in the game.

# 124 cowboyscowboys @ 06/09/09 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fcb-santana


	Harris went to the Pro Bowl in 07. He had 5 sacks in 08, same as 06 when he went to the Pro Bowl. He is still one of the best DTs in the game.

You misread I have no problem with Tommie Harris and his 90 overall. Al Harris CB Packers.

# 125 fcb-santana @ 06/09/09 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cowboyscowboys


	You misread I have no problem with Tommie Harris and his 90 overall. Al Harris CB Packers.

Oopsie.

My mistake.

# 126 billyboy316 @ 06/09/09 01:50 AM

Manning is not as fast as Hester. He just looks as fast because he doesn't sit their and dance on his kickoff returns. He gets the ball and just goes.

Again I am not too worried about the ratings because I know some players will be getting a bump and if they don't then I have the power to edit their ratings.

# 127 Acedeck @ 06/09/09 02:11 AM

I'm a little late to the party, but I see there are some major changes to the overall ratings of players. Hester at a 71, interesting. He had almost 700 yards last year, and that was with Orton's little pea-shooter arm. I know he's not an elite receiver, but damn. 71 rating with 99 speed? He averaged 13 yards per catch last year, which is right up there with Andre Johnson and Santana Moss. I wouldn't rate him much higher than 76 or so, but 71 is 2 away from a D+.

I'm not normally one to complain about ratings though, so I'll wait and see how the rest of the league pans out. I just don't see how some of these ratings became. "The Other" Adrian Peterson is rated the same as Garrett Wolfe? Get the hell out of here. Wolfe absolutely sucks and Peterson is a career 4.1 rush avg back. He averaged 5 per attempt last season when filling in for Forte. He's so underrated it's ridiculous (in this game and real life). How can a career 4.1 rush avg back be rated under a 70? Especially when he's pretty good at everything in the backfield. He blocks and catches very well. He's not the best runner, but I'm not saying he should be rated as one. 69 is just low. Oh yeah, and he can hang onto the ball. He fumbles 1.1 percent of his carries, compared to the Peterson from Minnesota who does it on 2.2 percent of his carries.

It's easy to tear them apart, so I'll just stop. I'm biased anyways. I'll hold off on judging them too harshly until after I see the rest of the teams.

# 128 Acedeck @ 06/09/09 06:10 AM

You're right, AP is a good fill-in back. He's not a back meant to carry it 30 times a game. He didn't do as well when i was just him, though he had a lot of pressure on him that year as the Bears had no identity on offense. I still think 69 is a tad low for him. 73 or 74 would be fair.

Manning's speed at 88 is very low. He may not be quite as fast as Hester, but it's not that big of a gap.

The one good thing about these ratings is that it appear as though overall team ratings won't all be bunched up in the 80's. In previous years, almost every team was in the high 70's, or in the 80's.

# 129 mKoz26 @ 06/09/09 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stux


	I think Da Bear's AP is under rated as well but not by a ton. I think one of the reasons his average is so high is because most teams expected him to be blocking or pass catching when they put Benson on the bench for almost all passing situation. That allowed him to get some good runs on passing downs. When Benson got hurt and AP had the full run of it he didn't do nearly as well as a fill in. I think he is a great player to fill in for downs needed to rest the number one guy. I would rather see him on the field over Jones though. What do you think overall? 74?

Are you living in 2006?

# 130 jimmyy201 @ 06/09/09 01:12 PM

i just noticed
but how come Brandon Rideau is not on Da Bears roster...
he has been working with the starters during OTAs this year n i has been looking very impressive

# 131 aholbert32 @ 06/09/09 01:25 PM

locked..use the ratings threads.

# 132 jimmyy201 @ 06/09/09 01:27 PM

since when is asking y a player isnt on a team a rating???

# 133 hoodlum10 @ 06/09/09 01:27 PM

these are garbage. how the hell is devin hester that low? there are just waaaaay to many people that are rated poorly. corey graham a 60? tillman only 82? dez clark n greg olsen should both be higher. The biggest snub of them all is ALEX BROWN. 78? god i hope every team isnt f****d up like this.

# 134 jimmyy201 @ 06/09/09 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hoodlum10


	these are garbage. how the hell is devin hester that low? there are just waaaaay to many people that are rated poorly. corey graham a 60? tillman only 82? dez clark n greg olsen should both be higher. The biggest snub of them all is ALEX BROWN. 78? god i hope every team isnt f****d up like this.

no doubt Alex Brown has been better then ogunleye for the past few years n i still dont know how corey graham is our second worst DB n mcbride is 5 points higher then him yet he barely played last year

# 135 ShimSham @ 06/09/09 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aholbert32


	locked..use the ratings threads.

I think you forgot to lock it.

# 136 hoodlum10 @ 06/09/09 01:39 PM

now i'm expecting a lot out of dj moore, but the fact that he is only 1 pt lower than nate vasher is ridiculous. i know vash has been hampered by injuries and what not, but is still a very servicable player. the three years he was healthy(2004-2006) he had 16 ints. i think he should be more in the low 80's where peanut is, and peanut should be 85 or 86. just my 2 cents. oh yeah, marcus harrison a 68? tisk tisk ea, tisk tisk

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 67Next »

More Links

Madden NFL 10: Chicago Bears Ratings (ESPN Videogames)