Madden 2010 News Post

Madden NFL 10: Chicago Bears Ratings (ESPN Videogames)

12:35 PM - June 8, 2009 by iamemmittsmith

ESPN Videogames will be posting player ratings for Madden NFL 10, on a team by team basis, starting with the NFC North, and the Chicago Bears.

Quote:


	"Starting today, ESPN Video Games is unveiling the "Madden NFL 10" ratings, highlighting a division each week and revealing a team a day. First up, the NFC North and the Chicago Bears."

Game: Madden NFL 10Reader Score: 7.5/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Wii / Xbox 360Votes for game: 76 - View All

Madden NFL 10 Videos

Member Comments

# 81 ShimSham @ 06/08/09 10:21 PM

And for people who say Woodson is old and declining, they said the same thing in 2006 when only the Packers and Bucs wanted him. (and the Bucs wanted him as a safety)

Unfortunately for them, Woodson has done nothing but improve every year since joining the team in 2006. And he's shown absolutely no signs of slowing down, despite his age.

# 82 ShimSham @ 06/08/09 10:22 PM

Isn't having roughly 30 minutes TOP pretty average?

# 83 J Masta J @ 06/08/09 10:23 PM

Analysis of Packers Known Ratings:

QB- Aaron Rodgers- 86. Exactly what I predicted. He had a great statistical year and is on the verge of entering the elite.
HB- Ryan Grant- 85- I'm pleasantly surprised. He went over 1000 but lacked the burst he had the year before. I was thinking 82ish.
WR- Greg Jennings-90-Jennings is electric. I thought he could've been a few higher, especially with Roddy White @ 94. But he's still gonna be good.
WR- Donald Driver- 85 He may not be the number one target anymore but he is still a reliable threat.
--------
LB- Aaron Kampman- 93 New position, but very similar role. This is about spot on.
CB- Al Harris- 90- Even better than I thought they'd give him. Came back from a spleen injury and was at top form.
CB- Charles Woodson- 93- Again, spot on. He is resurecting his career and is now a top 5 cb.
CB Tramon Williiams- 73- A little surprised. He stepped in for Harris and showed he's starting material. Thought he'd be like a 78.
FS- Nick Collins- 93- #36 was a big time playmaker and made the probowl but his fundamentals could still use some work and I didn;t think he should've cracked 90.
SS- Atari Bigby- 80- Again, exactly what I predicted. Dissapointing injury riddled year after an amazing '07.

# 84 ShimSham @ 06/08/09 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Masta J


	Analysis of Packers Known Ratings

We also know Jeremy Thompson is rated 50 overall. (injury blog) but I think if he can win the starting ROLB job (which he has a good chance of doing) then he can definitely make Donny re-rate him.

# 85 ShimSham @ 06/08/09 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bears_16_and_0


	yes, thats what im saying. Those were 3 games where we blew it at the end, and the 'too much time on the field for the d' excuse gets made but the stats don't back it up

Oh okay, I got confused who was arguing what.

# 86 jimmyy201 @ 06/08/09 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Falzon


	it doesnt matter who is predicted to win the division, i mean...wtf are you talking about... were in june for god sake, Were talkin about the Packers secondary rite?.....not defense as a whole...our secondary had how many int's for pick 6's?? people are so quick to hate on woodson, harris, and collins...all pro bowlers my friend...NOT over rated.. i think collins is a bit high but he killed it last year.

the whole reason this all started is cos someone said the bears D was getting old but then not sure if it was the same person but some packers fan said the bears D was average age which is what i was looking for
and i was also questioning how Ea could make corey graham only a 60 considering he came in cos of injuries n played very well yet he is said by alot that he is better then vasher

# 87 jimmyy201 @ 06/08/09 10:28 PM

i will even admit Green Bays DBs are better then Da bears DBs

# 88 J Masta J @ 06/08/09 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShimSham


	We also know Jeremy Thompson is rated 50 overall. (injury blog) but I think if he can win the starting ROLB job (which he has a good chance of doing) then he can definitely make Donny re-rate him.

Yah, he's been shining in OTA's. I think Kampmans time in GB is limited.

# 89 PlatooN @ 06/08/09 10:30 PM

i'm surprised Tramon williams is so low too. hopefully he has a high potential. he steppped up HUGE for harris

# 90 J Masta J @ 06/08/09 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmyy201


	i will even admit Green Bays DBs are better then Da bears DBs

Hahaha oh wow! The Bears don't even have an NFL caliber safety

# 91 jimmyy201 @ 06/08/09 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Masta J


	Hahaha oh wow! The Bears don't even have an NFL caliber safety

never knew there were requirements to be n NFL caliber safety...

# 92 J Masta J @ 06/08/09 10:33 PM

Did some more digging on pastapadre.com

Cullen Jenkins: 82
AJ Hawk: 78

Not surprised about Hawk
But I think Cullen Jenkins should be at least an 86.

# 93 ShimSham @ 06/08/09 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmyy201


	the bears D was getting old but then not sure if it was the same person but some packers fan said the bears D was average age which is what i was looking for

It was a different person because I was the one who said they were of an average age. Urlacher is older, most everyone else is around the average NFL age.

Same with the Packers, Woodson and Harris are old, but Woodson has apparently found the fountain of youth because it hasn't affected him at all. He's just gotten better. And then the rest of the defense is very young, aside from like Ryan Pickett and Kampman.

# 94 ShimSham @ 06/08/09 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Falzon


	i'm surprised Tramon williams is so low too. hopefully he has a high potential. he steppped up HUGE for harris

He'll benefit from more zone coverages that Capers will use. He doesn't have the physical ability to stay step for step with guys in man coverage like Woodson and Harris can. He can to a degree, but not enough. He's got real good instincts though and a lot of his INTs came in zones last year. He's a great young player

# 95 J Masta J @ 06/08/09 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmyy201


	never knew there were requirements to be n NFL caliber safety...

Just one: don't suck.

# 96 jimmyy201 @ 06/08/09 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShimSham


	It was a different person because I was the one who said they were of an average age. Urlacher is older, most everyone else is around the average NFL age. Same with the Packers, Woodson and Harris are old, but Woodson has apparently found the fountain of youth because it hasn't affected him at all. He's just gotten better. And then the rest of the defense is very young, aside from like Ryan Pickett and Kampman.

i will admit woodson n harris are old but still can play like they were young
but saying urlacher is too old to play is really a joke hes still a 100+ tackler n i think with the changing of the D back to lovie will allow him to produce better again in the passing game considering with babitches D he was always on the line of scrimage...

# 97 PlatooN @ 06/08/09 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Masta J


	Did some more digging on pastapadre.com Cullen Jenkins: 82 AJ Hawk: 78 Not surprised about Hawk But I think Cullen Jenkins should be at least an 86.

true, jenkins was a force before injury. run stuffer and pass rusher

# 98 ShimSham @ 06/08/09 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Masta J


	Did some more digging on pastapadre.com Cullen Jenkins: 82 AJ Hawk: 78 Not surprised about Hawk But I think Cullen Jenkins should be at least an 86.

damn Hawk took a big downturn (from like 94), but after last year it should be expected. I think he'll do better in the new defense though. He won't be required to play coverage as much and he'll be able to play against the run which is what he's always excelled at.

# 99 jimmyy201 @ 06/08/09 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Masta J


	Just one: don't suck.

kevin payne is good in the run game n below average in the passing game... josh bollucks is horrible n i dont understand y we signed him... n let go of mike brown which was one of the top safetys in the game when healthy

# 100 fcb-santana @ 06/08/09 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bears_16_and_0


	yes, thats what im saying. Those were 3 games where we blew it at the end, and the 'too much time on the field for the d' excuse gets made but the stats don't back it up

8 three and outs plus two fumbles on the Carolina game. 67 pass attempts in the TB game. Are you seriously saying the D was not on the field too long on that game?

« Previous 1 2 3 456 7 Next »

More Links

Madden NFL 10: Chicago Bears Ratings (ESPN Videogames)