Madden 2010 News Post

Madden NFL 10: Chicago Bears Ratings (ESPN Videogames)

11:35 AM - June 8, 2009 by iamemmittsmith

ESPN Videogames will be posting player ratings for Madden NFL 10, on a team by team basis, starting with the NFC North, and the Chicago Bears.

Quote:


	"Starting today, ESPN Video Games is unveiling the "Madden NFL 10" ratings, highlighting a division each week and revealing a team a day. First up, the NFC North and the Chicago Bears."

Game: Madden NFL 10Reader Score: 7.5/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Wii / Xbox 360Votes for game: 76 - View All

Madden NFL 10 Videos

Member Comments

# 41 mKoz26 @ 06/08/09 03:16 PM

How is DeAngelo Hall ('Skins) rated higher than Nathan Vasher? That, and the overrated tackling of Urlacher, are my only disputes. DeAngelo is average at best, but he gets a 79? No love for my man Nathan Vasher.

# 42 GrnEyedBanditTN @ 06/08/09 03:40 PM

I don't know what to say about our corners... wow. I can only imagine about other teams and their ratings.

# 43 fcb-santana @ 06/08/09 04:14 PM

Our corners were not great last year. Vasher was hurt most of the season and Tillman didn't do much. Urlacher's tackling at 93 is fine with me.

And the ratings were scaled down across the board for every team.

# 44 JeriousNorwood @ 06/08/09 04:17 PM

It seems once again mods just close what they feel like closing based on how much they like the thread. This is CLEARLY discussion on ratings, so why has this not been locked or moved. Does no one see the sticky at the top of the page for ratings? Delete this thread please, this clutters the board for other, more important discussion.

Sorry for being an ***, but I've had threads closed because they "clutter the board" and this is doing the same according to the mods.

# 45 mKoz26 @ 06/08/09 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fcb-santana


	Our corners were not great last year. Vasher was hurt most of the season and Tillman didn't do much. Urlacher's tackling at 93 is fine with me. And the ratings were scaled down across the board for every team.

I'm only talking relative to others. When D. Hall was rated 68 all the 'Skins fans freaked so they bumped him up... 11 POINTS. And now he is better than Nathan Vasher?

And Urlacher cannot tackle for his life. I hate to say it, but he's washed up.

# 46 Brandwin @ 06/08/09 04:27 PM

I am missing it somewhere, but I don't see the option to check out who is coming up in the future.

Can someone tell me what day the 49ers ratings are coming out?

Thanks!

# 47 fcb-santana @ 06/08/09 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mKoz26


	I'm only talking relative to others. When D. Hall was rated 68 all the 'Skins fans freaked so they bumped him up... 11 POINTS. And now he is better than Nathan Vasher? And Urlacher cannot tackle for his life. I hate to say it, but he's washed up.

I think they should both be at 79 or 80. Both Pro Bowlers had terrible years.

I still believe in Urlacher's ability. I just think he wasn't used properly last season. The D line did him no favors either.

# 48 mKoz26 @ 06/08/09 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fcb-santana


	I think they should both be at 79 or 80. Both Pro Bowlers had terrible years. I still believe in Urlacher's ability. I just think he wasn't used properly last season. The D line did him no favors either.

As for the top, fair enough.

I don't really think Urlacher has it in him anymore though. He is losing his quickness, which is what made him the great pursuit linebacker that he once was. Last season he couldn't tackle a thing. But, he was beat up due to the D-Line slacking. He may return to form this season, but I don't find it likely.

# 49 fcb-santana @ 06/08/09 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mKoz26


	As for the top, fair enough. I don't really think Urlacher has it in him anymore though. He is losing his quickness, which is what made him the great pursuit linebacker that he once was. Last season he couldn't tackle a thing. But, he was beat up due to the D-Line slacking. He may return to form this season, but I don't find it likely.

You have to believe man. I'm hoping Marinelli is as good as advertised a D line coach. Lovie is calling the defense. Hopefully the offense will stay on the field longer providing more rest for the defense.

We have trailed off subject.

# 50 Brandon_c993 @ 06/08/09 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cowboyscowboys


	I am not liking the lack of athletic ratings for the first set of CB's. Also Brian Urlacher is more athletic then 90% of the Bears DB's, this is were I have a hard time accepting the extreme rating changes. I know by no means are their CB's burners playing Cover 2 Charles Tillman 82 Speed Nathan Vasher 85 Speed Brian Urlacher 85 speed <-- that urks me so bad, yes I realize early in his career he could run like a "safety" but he is slowin down now. Ray Lewis is faster then Charles Tillman gosh I don't want to have to edit 75% of the rosters but it will actually kill me to see it.

early in his career his was a safety(no not ealry in the NFL but early in his football career)...

# 51 jimmyy201 @ 06/08/09 08:13 PM

how come corey graham is only a 60?
he played every game last year n did atleast decent???
mcbride is so much worse then he is but hes 5 points better?

n how is garza 5 points better then beekman???
n pisa tinosmioa(spelling is wrong) is only a 71??? how come he takes a much more big drop then alot of other 85s from madden 09?

n i love how a receiver that didnt catch a pass goes up 1 but hester goes down 10... if hester goes down 10 shouldnt the person that threw it to him last year go down 10 also???

# 52 J Masta J @ 06/08/09 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brandon_c993


	early in his career his was a safety(no not ealry in the NFL but early in his football career)...

Der...that's why he said it.

# 53 jimmyy201 @ 06/08/09 08:36 PM

i also dont see how josh bullocks is our second best DB...
has EA ever even seen him play???
corey graham may be the starting FS anyways...

# 54 jimmyy201 @ 06/08/09 08:41 PM

im not positive but im pretty sure they have peanut tillman as our slowest corner...
did anyone see tillman chase adrian peterson down from behind last year?

# 55 J Masta J @ 06/08/09 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan54matt


	i am the biggest bears fan that u will ever see ( ever in california ) and i know the chciago bears and i know them good and u no i dont like most of the ratings and there is a big thing i saw ... josh bullocks ... probly one of the worst safites of today and he is #2 ... the bears have a very very good team ecspecially on the the d side and i thing they need to take another look!!!

Bears d is old and on the decline.

# 56 jimmyy201 @ 06/08/09 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan54matt


	i am the biggest bears fan that u will ever see ( ever in california ) and i know the chciago bears and i know them good and u no i dont like most of the ratings and there is a big thing i saw ... josh bullocks ... probly one of the worst safites of today and he is #2 ... the bears have a very very good team ecspecially on the the d side and i thing they need to take another look!!!

this is true from what i see it looks like our offense is gonna be better then our D this year on madden... which is sad
the only reason we had a horrible pass D last year was cos of bob babitches scheme he doesnt know how to run a D
this year with Lovie takin it over we wont blitz our best coverage guys every play....

# 57 jimmyy201 @ 06/08/09 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Masta J


	Bears d is old and on the decline.

plz tell me how they are old???
whose old??? urlacher???
theres like 3 players that are 30 or older that start

# 58 Kevin26385 @ 06/08/09 08:48 PM

I know people are complaing about other people critizing the ratings..But COME ON!

I am a die hard bears fan and something is wrong with Tommie Harris being a 92 overall..He was absolutely Terrible this year.

# 59 Carolina Panthers @ 06/08/09 08:48 PM

funny how hester is a 99 at kick return when all he does is run out of bounds and gets injured (coughpanthersgamecough) yeah i live in chi town and now i gotta watch these wack receivers ugh

# 60 bowdown2shadi @ 06/08/09 08:51 PM

No new QB ratings

« Previous 1 234 5 6 7 Next »

More Links

Madden NFL 10: Chicago Bears Ratings (ESPN Videogames)