Matt10's Heisman Sliders (PS3)

[Chrisksaint]

How well would these sliders run on All American instead of Heisman

[jira2004]

Just a quick thought to that formula is everyone playing style is soo different from the next person that it is really hard to be analytical about the sliders..............I've also notice that A rated teams of course plays better and runs better than B or C rated teams with these sliders like it should be.....

[frankstallone83]

That's all true - I was just really bored at work today!

Even though I've played for a long time I've never liked to mess w/ sliders too much (try to give ea benefit of the doubt) but AA is to easy and Heisman is no fun so your sliders have really helped me out, matt10.

[JayBee74]

Played as Navy (C+) against Akron (D+). They actually lead 6-0 with 17 seconds in the first half. Then I connected on a fly route for 68 yards and a score to lead 7-6 at halftime. Inexplicable coverage-the corner played bump and run and there was no safety help. Once my WR broke free it was off to the races.

Akron moved the ball early scoring on a 17 yard pass to the TE, and shot itself in the foot with a INT in the endzone. They threw 3 picks in total, which I had no problem with.

What I had a problem with once again was the ease of running to the outside. I know it's Akron but once I got the 14-6 lead I did nothing but run to the left side as my #1 HB got 140 yards on 28 carries, while my #2 got 43 yards on 6 carries. My #1 HB had only 8 yards in the first half , until I went with sweeps, power, and counter runs to the left side using Big Ace packages. This is with CPU Rush D at 45 actually +5 over your 40. CPU tackling was set at your default of 50. I won 28-6.

Maybe I shouldn't be complaining too much because it was Akron, but you'd think the CPU would adjust to the constant pounding of the ball to the left side and the fact that I wasn't passing.

I would access my skill level at D+ and that's probably generous.

[Howie5]

I played as Cincy and lost to utah 35-25...Collaros threw the ball over 45 times for over 350 yards but the defense couldn't stop Utah's spread. They're ranked #23 & Cincy is #24. Great game again!

[Matt10]

Quote: Originally Posted by JayBee74

Played as Navy (C+) against Akron (D+). They actually lead 6-0 with 17 seconds in the first half. Then I connected on a fly route for 68 yards and a score to lead 7-6 at halftime. Inexplicable coverage-the corner played bump and run and there was no safety help. Once my WR broke free it was off to the races. Akron moved the ball early scoring on a 17 yard pass to the TE, and shot itself in the foot with a INT in the endzone. They threw 3 picks in total, which I had no problem with. What I had a problem with once again was the ease of running to the outside. I know it's Akron but once I got the 14-6 lead I did nothing but run to the left side as my #1 HB got 140 yards on 28 carries, while my #2 got 43 yards on 6 carries. My #1 HB had only 8 yards in the first half , until I went with sweeps, power, and counter runs to the left side using Big Ace packages. This is with CPU Rush D at 45 actually +5 over your 40. CPU tackling was set at your default of 50. I won 28-6. Maybe I shouldn't be complaining too much because it was Akron, but you'd think the CPU would adjust to the constant pounding of the ball to the left side and the fact that I wasn't passing. I would access my skill level at D+ and that's probably generous.

Well, I also did testing here - and was actually the majority of my focus. So I went drastic from 60 RBL for the user, dropped it to 20.

Results were interesting I would say, although I tested with VT against VT - so moving the slider to 20 was actually seemingly even on counter plays.

I'm going to play a game with the RBL at 20 - and report back. If it doesn't hurt the run game too much, and most importantly remove the "exploit" of the counter - or running to outside in general - it could be added to the set.

[Matt10]

Halftime of Iowa (CPU) @ Wisconsin (me)

Iowa 27, Wisc 14

Passing: Iowa - Stanzi, 11/13 261 yds, 4 TD **getting killed by going for the big hits instead of the wrap up, also blitzing too much**

Wisc - Tolzien, 10/15 234 yds, 2 TD, INT **got lucky on a long screen pass to Clay for 70 yards**

Rushing, now here's where I was a tad skeptical, but pleasantly surprised...

Rushing: Iowa - Robinson, 11 att 85 yds (30 yd long)
Rushing: Wisc - Clay, 16 att 76 yds (12 yd long)

So, there you go. I'm going to quit the game - pretty happy with the stats, fairly realistic I'd say, now I'm going to work on the QB accuracy and adjust FGA, same with tackling.

I decided that I wont update the sliders, there are some drastic changes and I think the ones on the front page are working for me, and appearing so with others.

If I see any drastic need for change, it'll happen. For now, the one on the first page is set. I suggest for those of you looking for more of a challenge to post what your findings were. I've realized it's not easy to tailor to everyone's needs here.

Would still love the feedback - thanks again so far, glad this set is giving something back in a way - at first, I wasn't even sure of posting them.

[Chrisksaint]

Just started my 2nd year in my LSU dynasty with these sliders and first time playing on Heisman. I beat Southern Miss 42-13 which seemed pretty realistic so i'm optimistic about these sliders/