***(6/09/2006) Convince Updated Rosters***

[convince]

Thanks Kilmer and Rickster101

Quote: Originally Posted by koebner

This is a very accurate roster in terms of roster moves and jersey numbers(includes Johnathan Sullivan trade,etc.). I have removed fake photos from rookies and second year players and with permission would be glad to upload it here. Anyway,a very impressive effort.

Hey, go ahead no problem w/ that.

[Rickster101]

Quote: Originally Posted by convince

Thanks Kilmer and Rickster101 Hey, go ahead no problem w/ that.

Actually I didn't see to much wrong with the photos except for when they appeared more then once other then that I think they're great just get rid of the double photos appearing more this once and they're good to go.






Holla Back ya'll
Rickster101 aka "Jack Bauer"

[koebner]

Quote: Originally Posted by convince

Thanks Kilmer and Rickster101 Hey, go ahead no problem w/ that.

Here is Convince's file with fake and generic photos removed for any players that have them.I have been very thorough,but there may be a couple left.I also put a few players in Free Agents back with their teams(i.e. Daryn Colledge to Packers),and a couple depth chart moves.

[NINJAK2]

Convince,

Great rosters and thanks. FYI there is something wrong with Rams (FB)Hedgecock in your roster. He appears with no face and his arms are blue and gold like the rams. I can try to check thru the rest of the roster to see if anyone else appears like this, but it would be a little while.

[Flipmo23]

There were only 245 rookies drafted, no?

[Millennium]

Quote: Originally Posted by Flipmo23

There were only 245 rookies drafted, no?

Maybe he added undrafted as well (Such as Drew Olson from UCLA signing with the Ravens?)

[Rickster101]

Quote: Originally Posted by Flipmo23

There were only 245 rookies drafted, no?

Uh-oh I think some of last years rookies were counted because there quite a few guys in the FA that should be on teams actually due to play this season pending training camps and final roster lineups 270 rookies does sound abit high but hey who knows they might just make it but those cats from last season need to be set with that one (1) year increase actually those would be last years rookies.

Still 270 isn't too unusal I've seen rosters go higher like noplaces rosters sometime ago but if only 245 were drafted how could this be unless....well lets say the math tells the story, easy fix though....check the players (Rookies) tenure from last season....the rookies at that time and bump em' up to reflect that this is their second year easily done if this is the case but you gotta check em' first!!!



Holla Back ya'll
Rickster101 aka "Jack Bauer"

[Flipmo23]

Forgot about undrafted rookies, makes sense I guess then.