MLB 15 The Show Player Ratings - Top Rated Players For Each Team
Submitted on: 03/06/2015 by
Steve Noah
Earlier we posted the top rated players at each position for MLB 15 The Show, below are the top rated players for each team.
Feature Article
Submitted on: 03/06/2015 by
Steve Noah
MLB 15 The Show Videos
Member Comments
|
|||||||||||||
|
Photos are in the game but they were using fantasy draft. Fantasy draft changes all the player pictures in to the videogame versions of the players.
Same thing happens when a player gets traded in the game because they want them to have the correct team hat.
# 22
SirSpencAlot36 @ 03/06/15 04:26 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 23
lazloisdavrock @ 03/06/15 04:30 PM
Machado, JJ Hardy, Zach Britton aren't top 10 in their position? 
more like top 5
more like top 5
# 24
SirSpencAlot36 @ 03/06/15 04:33 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 25
thechamp923 @ 03/06/15 04:38 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
I am not going to say anyone is over or under-rated since I don't know what criteria was used to covert their stats to ratings and what stats the game considers most important for a position. What I will assume is that for each position, except in cases where the rating is manually tweaked, that players are ranked fairly on the criteria that is set up for each position. Now whether or not I, or everyone else agrees with the criteria might be another matter.
# 27
El_MaYiMbE @ 03/06/15 05:40 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
Yes its not US baseball, but what from his pitching in Japan AND his pitching in the US, would lead anyone to believe he is not as good as advertised?
# 28
Ghost Of The Year @ 03/06/15 05:46 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 29
ShowTyme15 @ 03/06/15 05:47 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
Lol why are you guys talking about wins and loses like those make any difference in the ratings? Over the last 3 seasons Scherzer has been the 3rd best starter in baseball. 10.46 K/9, 2.59 BB/9, 0.85 HR/9, and a .226 AVG against warrant a 94 or whatever he is.
# 31
breakfastcat @ 03/06/15 06:29 PM
As far as The Angels are concerned, the OVRs look ok. I think Richards and Calhoun are a bit underrated here, but considering their method of evaluating players I can understand how they came to those ratings. What I don't understand is how Dee Gordon is rated higher than Howie Kendrick. Gordon has had one really good half season due to an abnormally high BABIP, while the rest of his career has shown a below average ability to get on base, while Kendrick is coming off one of his best years both offensively and defensively, and has proven to be one of the more consistent 2b in the game. Call me a homer if you want(I realize he's on the Dodgers now), but that just doesn't make sense to me. Does speed really make all the difference?
From what I saw I felt the ratings of players looks pretty well done. Always going to be disagreements when it comes to ratings, just human nature to have some bias in you.
I was happy with ratings I saw of Reds players, some might even be a tad high.
Cant wait to get the game and check it all out, really hope pitchers repertoires are improved, as this is the worst thing in this game that they do. Very few straight changes thrown, yet in MLBTS that's what they give almost every pitcher, would like to see them put more effort in this area to be more accurate, although if thast all we have to worry about them that's pretty good
I was happy with ratings I saw of Reds players, some might even be a tad high.
Cant wait to get the game and check it all out, really hope pitchers repertoires are improved, as this is the worst thing in this game that they do. Very few straight changes thrown, yet in MLBTS that's what they give almost every pitcher, would like to see them put more effort in this area to be more accurate, although if thast all we have to worry about them that's pretty good
# 33
ShowTyme15 @ 03/06/15 06:48 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 34
Ghost Of The Year @ 03/06/15 06:55 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
littering and?
littering and?
|
|||||||||||||
|
It was cool to see that I was close to the mark with some of my predictions with my team:
- RF Markakis 81
- CF Young Jr 77
- 1B Freeman 84
- LF Gomes (75-ish?)
- 3B CJohnson (76 likely)
- C Bethancourt 68
- 2B Callaspo (71-ish)
- SS Simmons 84
- C Pierzynski 73
- IF KJohnson (74-ish)
- OF Almonte (69-ish)
- IF Gosselin (76-ish)
- OF Perez (68-ish)
- Teheran 84
- Wood 82
- Miller 80
- Minor 81
- Stults 74
- Wandy 75
- Russell 76-ish
- Outman 70?
- Kohn 72?
- Grilli 77
- Vizcaino 60
- Kimbrel 96
- RF Markakis 81
- CF Young Jr 77
- 1B Freeman 84
- LF Gomes (75-ish?)
- 3B CJohnson (76 likely)
- C Bethancourt 68
- 2B Callaspo (71-ish)
- SS Simmons 84
- C Pierzynski 73
- IF KJohnson (74-ish)
- OF Almonte (69-ish)
- IF Gosselin (76-ish)
- OF Perez (68-ish)
- Teheran 84
- Wood 82
- Miller 80
- Minor 81
- Stults 74
- Wandy 75
- Russell 76-ish
- Outman 70?
- Kohn 72?
- Grilli 77
- Vizcaino 60
- Kimbrel 96
Judging a pitcher by how many wins he has is as useless as judging a hitters ability on how many RBI's he can drive in. Such a pointless stat when arguing a players case.
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 40
CubsWillRiseAgain @ 03/06/15 09:13 PM
Rizzo at 84 is very low. Castro at 80 is low.
They had Jon Lester, Cole Hamels at B potential, and Josh Harrison at an A. Thats absurd putting Harrison's potential over two bona fide aces.
They had Jon Lester, Cole Hamels at B potential, and Josh Harrison at an A. Thats absurd putting Harrison's potential over two bona fide aces.
Post A Comment
Working...