MLB 15 The Show Player Ratings - Top Rated Players For Each Team

[seanjeezy]

Lol why are you guys talking about wins and loses like those make any difference in the ratings? Over the last 3 seasons Scherzer has been the 3rd best starter in baseball. 10.46 K/9, 2.59 BB/9, 0.85 HR/9, and a .226 AVG against warrant a 94 or whatever he is.

[breakfastcat]

As far as The Angels are concerned, the OVRs look ok. I think Richards and Calhoun are a bit underrated here, but considering their method of evaluating players I can understand how they came to those ratings. What I don't understand is how Dee Gordon is rated higher than Howie Kendrick. Gordon has had one really good half season due to an abnormally high BABIP, while the rest of his career has shown a below average ability to get on base, while Kendrick is coming off one of his best years both offensively and defensively, and has proven to be one of the more consistent 2b in the game. Call me a homer if you want(I realize he's on the Dodgers now), but that just doesn't make sense to me. Does speed really make all the difference?

[CaseIH]

From what I saw I felt the ratings of players looks pretty well done. Always going to be disagreements when it comes to ratings, just human nature to have some bias in you.


I was happy with ratings I saw of Reds players, some might even be a tad high.


Cant wait to get the game and check it all out, really hope pitchers repertoires are improved, as this is the worst thing in this game that they do. Very few straight changes thrown, yet in MLBTS that's what they give almost every pitcher, would like to see them put more effort in this area to be more accurate, although if thast all we have to worry about them that's pretty good

[jaysfan17]

Quote: Originally Posted by ShowTyme15

Kershaw is 98-49 in that same span.

And...........

[ShowTyme15]

Quote: Originally Posted by jaysfan17

And...........

And scene....

Quote: Originally Posted by seanjeezy

Lol why are you guys talking about wins and loses like those make any difference in the ratings? Over the last 3 seasons Scherzer has been the 3rd best starter in baseball. 10.46 K/9, 2.59 BB/9, 0.85 HR/9, and a .226 AVG against warrant a 94 or whatever he is.

[Ghost Of The Year]

Quote: Originally Posted by jaysfan17

And...........

littering and?
littering and?
littering and?

[Scott]

No Holland for the Rangers? what the hell...

[Nando12]

Quote: Originally Posted by breakfastcat

As far as The Angels are concerned, the OVRs look ok. I think Richards and Calhoun are a bit underrated here, but considering their method of evaluating players I can understand how they came to those ratings. What I don't understand is how Dee Gordon is rated higher than Howie Kendrick. Gordon has had one really good half season due to an abnormally high BABIP, while the rest of his career has shown a below average ability to get on base, while Kendrick is coming off one of his best years both offensively and defensively, and has proven to be one of the more consistent 2b in the game. Call me a homer if you want(I realize he's on the Dodgers now), but that just doesn't make sense to me. Does speed really make all the difference?

Imo, Weaver is a better pitcher than 80. He's definitely better than Shoemaker & Shoe is rated higher. Agreed about Richards, though. He's gonna be our ace for a while.