Home
Preview
Backbreaker Preview

    Last summer, NaturalMotion announced the development of their new football game, Backbreaker, and the nature of the game has been shrouded in mystery since that time. We've known from the beginning that Backbreaker looks to become the first sports game to implement the euphoria engine, heralded for its realistic physics simulation. Information regarding the game has come in small doses since the initial announcement, but let's take a look at what we know about Backbreaker.

    Backbreaker uses the euphoria engine, also a NaturalMotion product, to feature realistic interactive tackles produced by the engine in real-time. This technique runs in sharp contrast to the canned animations used by the other football games we've seen in the past, and it essentially means that we will never make the same tackle twice. Backbreaker utilizes motion capture animations for movements such as running and catching, but makes use of another NaturalMotion technology called morpheme to manipulate these animations in real-time. These new technologies should provide not only realistic tackles, but the most genuine all-around animations we've ever seen in a sports game. Because these movements rely on the engine rather than scores of motion capture animations, the hope is that these technologies can also save time and resources that can be better devoted to other areas of development.

    In addition to the revolutionary animations, Backbreaker employs other methods to contribute to a stimulating experience. Rendering techniques such as full self shadowing, motion blur, and color correction bring more detail to the action on the field. The impressive graphics don't stop there, as they extend to the stands where nearly a hundred thousand 3D fans respond appropriately to the game in progress. While other games settle for 2D textures for the crowd, which often stick out like a sore thumb when compared to the models on the field, Backbreaker animates the crowd in 3D. The crowd also boasts a collective AI that assures that fans react realistically to the different types of events that transpire on the field.

    In keeping with the focus of delivering a rich on-field experience, the game's Dynamic Audio system generates sounds to match the different types of collisions. The sounds heard depend on the force of the contact as well as the elements involved. The sound of clashing helmets can be clearly distinguished from the wrap tackles, leg tackles, and other distinctive sounds of the game. The aforementioned crowd enjoys the benefits of Backbreaker's sound system too, as the crowd's mood reflects in their volume and cheers. With no mention of in-game commentary as of yet, it remains to be seen whether the game will feature an announcing crew or concentrate instead on the player's perspective. Given that a third-person chase camera broadcasts the action, the latter scenario isn't out of the question.

    Right-analog stick controls have taken on a greater role in sports video games over the last few years, with much success, and Backbreaker looks to continue that trend. Madden has made use of the right analog stick for running and tackling, but Backbreaker takes these ideas to the next level. While Madden adds running controls to the right analog stick because they seemingly ran out of buttons, Backbreaker makes the sticks the primary focus of its control scheme. The right analog stick controls all moves in an intuitive fashion. A spin move, for example, is performed with a circular movement of the right analog stick.

    The notion of relying on the analog sticks for nearly all of the game's controls seems complicated at first, but NaturalMotion decided to split the control scheme into two separate modes to keep things simple. Players operating in agile mode execute moves such as juking and spinning, while players in aggressive mode – which is activated by holding the right trigger – opt for more physical solutions like stiff-arms to escape defenders. This type of control scheme applies to all aspects of the game, even passing. Quarterbacks switch between available receivers by pressing left or right on the stick, and throw by tapping up for a bullet pass, or down and then up to air it out. Holding the left trigger allows quarterbacks to zero in on the selected receiver. This ability increases the accuracy of a pass to that receiver, but it also leaves the quarterback open to a sack as the third-person camera targets the receiver.

    Earlier this month, I explained that non-licensed football games such as Backbreaker can achieve success by distinguishing themselves from Madden and creating their own niches. Backbreaker seems to be following that blueprint. Its camera and control schemes, along with the impressive physics and graphics, prove that NaturalMotion's game will be different than anything we've played before. Developers have drawn inspiration from movies like Any Given Sunday and Friday Night Lights, as well as the Nike Gridiron commercial that featured Michael Vick and Terrell Owens. These influences have brought upon a more cinematic feel and focused the action on the field rather than your living room. Regardless of how the final product turns out, we're in for a football game set on creating its own identity.

    Backbreaker releases later this year. Be sure to check back with Operation Sports as we continue to learn about Backbreaker.


Backbreaker Videos
Member Comments
# 41 myownsun @ 05/15/08 10:14 AM
The tackle animations look fantastic
 
# 42 coogrfan @ 05/15/08 10:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by myownsun
The tackle animations look fantastic
Agreed, at least in the instances where defenders aren't missing diving tackles by 2-3 yards.
 
# 43 Candyman5 @ 05/15/08 11:37 AM
Actually I remember reading somewhere that they would be able to make BB a Red vs Blue type deal, XBLA title with the Euphoria engine. In the article it said that the size would be small enough to make it a XBLA title. I will search for the article again. I will post it if I find it. But I also read another article saying that it will be fully customizable, so we will have to see. IMO I hope it is a full fledge game with a franchise, sliders, etc. I would buy it to give it a chance. I know that it will be a slim chance that it will be perfect in the first try, heck Madden has been out for how long know and the cant even make a decent pocket but we will just see how this years version is. Euphoria looks great and I will be purchasing this. That has been my two cent and all IMO.
 
# 44 allBthere @ 05/15/08 12:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigdmo9999
The XBLA rumor was from early 07 and has been disproved. This is a full game.
source? It has never been proved one way or another- the original article that i posted is the only one that mentions it at all. I think at this point it will be a full game, or it would have already been released; but nothing has technically been 'disproved'.

for the last time; it's not a 'tech demo' either...

the game needs to be good at least for it to be effective marketing their engine. It will also (rightfully so) amaze people that only 5-6 people made this ENTIRE game! ...that's really amazing,
imagine a game w/ 20+ teams, franchise, customization etc..made by 6 people!
 
# 45 burnwood @ 05/15/08 02:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by K_GUN
maybe it's a viral campaign by EA to show off new engine in madden 09 (even showing us 'old engine' movies to keep us thrown off

never know
Tell me you're not that gullible.
 
# 46 muggins @ 05/15/08 05:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by allBthere
for the last time; it's not a 'tech demo' either...

imagine a game w/ 20+ teams, franchise, customization etc..made by 6 people!
Until I see some evidence that it is not a tech demo and it includes everything you've mentioned, yeah, it might as well be Wii sports.
 
# 47 allBthere @ 05/15/08 05:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mugginns
Until I see some evidence that it is not a tech demo and it includes everything you've mentioned, yeah, it might as well be Wii sports.
so madden is a tech demo w/ a franchise mode then in that case... oh and by the way, wii sports isn't a tech demo - just thought i'd let you know

instead of mentioning our most anticipated games, we should all change it to the seemingly now-interchangeable term - our most anticipated tech demo's.

did you'all hear rockstar's new tech demo is getting 10/10s?
gta4 is a great tech demo.
 
# 48 muggins @ 05/15/08 05:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by allBthere
so madden is a tech demo w/ a franchise mode then in that case... oh and by the way, wii sports isn't a tech demo - just thought i'd let you know

instead of mentioning our most anticipated games, we should all change it to the seemingly now-interchangeable term - our most anticipated tech demo's.

did you'all hear rockstar's new tech demo is getting 10/10s?
gta4 is a great tech demo.
I'm not really sure what this post means. Do you have some videos of franchise mode in Backbreaker? Or season mode? Or leagues? Or even player customization?
 
# 49 allBthere @ 05/15/08 06:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mugginns
I'm not really sure what this post means. Do you have some videos of franchise mode in Backbreaker? Or season mode? Or leagues? Or even player customization?
No I don't, but I do know that the company plans on releasing the game on the xbox360 and playstation3.

Do you have a viable working definition as to what a tech demo is?
 
# 50 jmood88 @ 05/16/08 02:42 PM
Quote:
A tech demo (technology demonstration) is a prototype, rough example or an otherwise incomplete version of a product, put together with the primary purpose of showcasing the idea, performance, method or the features of the product. They can be used as demonstrations to the investors, partners, journalists or even to potential customers in order to convince them of the viability of the chosen approach.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_demo\

This game seems to fit that definition based on the media released.
 
# 51 JRod @ 05/16/08 02:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by allBthere
so madden is a tech demo w/ a franchise mode then in that case... oh and by the way, wii sports isn't a tech demo - just thought i'd let you know

instead of mentioning our most anticipated games, we should all change it to the seemingly now-interchangeable term - our most anticipated tech demo's.

did you'all hear rockstar's new tech demo is getting 10/10s?
gta4 is a great tech demo.
Actually Wii sports was a Tech Demo.
 
# 52 allBthere @ 05/16/08 03:19 PM
jmood wrote :
"A tech demo (technology demonstration) is a prototype, rough example or an otherwise incomplete version of a product, put together with the primary purpose of showcasing the idea, performance, method or the features of the product. They can be used as demonstrations to the investors, partners, journalists or even to potential customers in order to convince them of the viability of the chosen approach."

do you know that Backbreaker is an 'incomplete version of a product'?
if this is the case, we can say that any game made by a company that uses an in-house developed engine where we do not have a full understanding of what the game will offer - is a tech demo. Gears of war then is a Tech Demo showcasing unreal engine 3 etc.. Do you believe this?
If the game has the same exact feature set as APF - will it be considered a tech demo? It's like the game is being faulted for using a new engine
 
# 53 allBthere @ 05/16/08 03:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRod
Actually Wii sports was a Tech Demo.
Actually Wii sports is not a tech demo. It was packaged with the system -so what? I've played it.

What would you rather own; NFL tour or Wii Sports? Which game has more gamplay options, more lastability, and is higher quality?

People play wii sports because it's a fun game, and continue to play it well after buying the console.

Just because a game showcases an engine/control scheme etc.. doesn't mean that it can in fairness be reduced to a 'tech demo' in title. I think we can say "this game can also be seen as a tech demo because ______" but in this case we can clearly say the same thing about AAA titles like Gears of War.
 
# 54 jmood88 @ 05/16/08 03:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by allBthere
do you know that Backbreaker is an 'incomplete version of a product'?
It's not being faulted for anything, people just aren't buying into this being an actual game yet when we've seen bits and pieces of things and a clip of a possible minigame. I don't know what Backbreaker is but I do know that they've released videos that have no sound(because it wasn't ready yet), they've shown very short clips of two or three people, and part of a minigame. Have we even seen different teams yet? All I remember seeing are the same two teams every single time.
Quote:
if this is the case, we can say that any game made by a company that uses an in-house developed engine where we do not have a full understanding of what the game will offer - is a tech demo.
No you really can't say that. People are saying that this game is a tech demo because of the lack of things shown.
Quote:
Gears of war then is a Tech Demo showcasing unreal engine 3 etc.. Do you believe this?
You're really reaching for comparisons. The tech demo video for Unreal 3 is actually pretty close to what we've seen of this game, just bits and pieces highlighting the engine.
 
# 55 allBthere @ 05/16/08 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmood88
It's not being faulted for anything, people just aren't buying into this being an actual game yet when we've seen bits and pieces of things and a clip of a possible minigame. I don't know what Backbreaker is but I do know that they've released videos that have no sound(because it wasn't ready yet), they've shown very short clips of two or three people, and part of a minigame. Have we even seen different teams yet? All I remember seeing are the same two teams every single time.

No you really can't say that. People are saying that this game is a tech demo because of the lack of things shown.

You're really reaching for comparisons. The tech demo video for Unreal 3 is actually pretty close to what we've seen of this game, just bits and pieces highlighting the engine.
bold#1
this is my problem - there are hundreds of game with a lack of 'things shown' yet they are not called tech demos. It seems people are saying this AS A RESULT of the fact that the new and exciting euphoria engine is being used.

Bold#2
I used the gears example to prove a point which is: the logical line of reasoning used to call backbreaker a tech demo can be used in crazy scenarios like epics gears of war - by exposing this i was hoping to show that it's the line of reasoning itself which is crazy. Also natural motion already has a bunch of actual tech demo vids, the backbreakergame.com website is not an extention of those, but it's own entity.

You actually sound as if you're skeptical that they are making a football game; is that the case?
Do you think the dev diaries about the control scheme were lies?
I didn't even think it was debatable that they're making a football game for consoles, - I'm pretty sure though that the main point you guys are making is that they are making this product to shop the engine, but you are not clear as to what that meas for the game itself.

If you think the game will be a tech demo - what does that mean? How would a "tech demo" football game differ from madden or APF in principle? In other words to call a game a tech demo, YOU are the one that needs criteria by which to call it that.

here is an example - " a football videogame ceases to be a 'game' and is a 'tech demo' in the event that it does not have a season mode." or some other criteria, follow?
or maybe it's a tech demo if you can only play 2 teams and play a single game at a time ? ----if this were the case as I've said in a different post it could be an XBLA title, which would have a heck of a lot more depth than other xbla titles.

If they release a retail game that you buy in a store, I think it's logical to assume that the game would have a season mode and we already know there is one minigame, and a uniform editor. I think I can assume a season mode and a variety of teams to make up a league for a number of reasons: 1) i'll give naturalmotion the benefit of the doubt that they are not complete morons 2) If they released a disc w/ 2 teams, tackle alley, and quckmatch only it would be slammed like few other games of this millenea, and sales would be next to nill 3) releasing a barebones game is cheaper and more effective for the company to do it over xbla and psn 4) even if you want to market your engine, you want people to at least take notice and create a CONSUMER DEMAND - which you cannot do if you sell 5k copies of a POS game; nobody's buying bomberman act zero's engine. Given my imo reasonable assumptions if that is all the game ships with, is that a tech demo and why?
 
# 56 jmood88 @ 05/16/08 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by allBthere
bold#1
this is my problem - there are hundreds of game with a lack of 'things shown' yet they are not called tech demos. It seems people are saying this AS A RESULT of the fact that the new and exciting euphoria engine is being used.
Which games? People are saying it because this is a company that has never made games before and isn't showing anything.

Quote:
Bold#2
I used the gears example to prove a point which is: the logical line of reasoning used to call backbreaker a tech demo can be used in crazy scenarios like epics gears of war - by exposing this i was hoping to show that it's the line of reasoning itself which is crazy. Also natural motion already has a bunch of actual tech demo vids, the backbreakergame.com website is not an extention of those, but it's own entity.
Your reasoning is faulty. There is absolutely no comparison between the two situations. The only thing that's similar is that they are using engines that they built. Epic, however showed the game to people(the media) before it came out, all the news about Backbreaker is coming from the team. No one has seen the game in action. Epic has also made games before so people don't really have a reason to be skeptical of them coming out with a game.
Quote:
You actually sound as if you're skeptical that they are making a football game; is that the case?
There has been nothing shown to suggest that a game is actually coming out. It has no release date, it hasn't been shown to the press, they haven't released any videos showing gameplay(outside of that one minigame video.) We haven't even seen more than two teams.
Quote:
Do you think the dev diaries about the control scheme were lies?
I didn't even think it was debatable that they're making a football game for consoles, - I'm pretty sure though that the main point you guys are making is that they are making this product to shop the engine, but you are not clear as to what that meas for the game itself.
It's pretty clear that if this whole thing is a tech demo then it isn't going to be a full game.
Quote:
If you think the game will be a tech demo - what does that mean? How would a "tech demo" football game differ from madden or APF in principle? In other words to call a game a tech demo, YOU are the one that needs criteria by which to call it that.
I posted the definition of a tech demo and that's what this game is looking like right now. Madden and All Pro Football are full games, we don't know what this thing is going to be.

Quote:
here is an example - " a football videogame ceases to be a 'game' and is a 'tech demo' in the event that it does not have a season mode." or some other criteria, follow?
or maybe it's a tech demo if you can only play 2 teams and play a single game at a time ? ----if this were the case as I've said in a different post it could be an XBLA title, which would have a heck of a lot more depth than other xbla titles.
A football game is a tech demo when you never see things working in concert. All we have seen are shots of tackling, a soundless pan of a stadium, and a few clips of the crowd. My criteria is pretty simple: show gameplay or I'll assume then I'll continue to speculate on whether it's a tech demo or not. If this was an established company that didn't have anything to gain by showing parts of their engine then my thinking would change but that's not the case with this game.

Quote:
If they release a retail game that you buy in a store, I think it's logical to assume that the game would have a season mode and we already know there is one minigame, and a uniform editor. I think I can assume a season mode and a variety of teams to make up a league for a number of reasons: 1) i'll give naturalmotion the benefit of the doubt that they are not complete morons 2) If they released a disc w/ 2 teams, tackle alley, and quckmatch only it would be slammed like few other games of this millenea, and sales would be next to nill 3) releasing a barebones game is cheaper and more effective for the company to do it over xbla and psn 4) even if you want to market your engine, you want people to at least take notice and create a CONSUMER DEMAND - which you cannot do if you sell 5k copies of a POS game; nobody's buying bomberman act zero's engine. Given my imo reasonable assumptions if that is all the game ships with, is that a tech demo and why?
Do you still not understand what a tech demo is? What I don't get is why you and a couple other people in here get so offended because people are talking about it being a tech demo.
 
# 57 allBthere @ 05/16/08 06:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmood88
Which games? People are saying it because this is a company that has never made games before and isn't showing anything.


Your reasoning is faulty. There is absolutely no comparison between the two situations. The only thing that's similar is that they are using engines that they built. Epic, however showed the game to people(the media) before it came out, all the news about Backbreaker is coming from the team. No one has seen the game in action. Epic has also made games before so people don't really have a reason to be skeptical of them coming out with a game.

There has been nothing shown to suggest that a game is actually coming out. It has no release date, it hasn't been shown to the press, they haven't released any videos showing gameplay(outside of that one minigame video.) We haven't even seen more than two teams.

It's pretty clear that if this whole thing is a tech demo then it isn't going to be a full game.

I posted the definition of a tech demo and that's what this game is looking like right now. Madden and All Pro Football are full games, we don't know what this thing is going to be.


A football game is a tech demo when you never see things working in concert. All we have seen are shots of tackling, a soundless pan of a stadium, and a few clips of the crowd. My criteria is pretty simple: show gameplay or I'll assume then I'll continue to speculate on whether it's a tech demo or not. If this was an established company that didn't have anything to gain by showing parts of their engine then my thinking would change but that's not the case with this game.


Do you still not understand what a tech demo is? What I don't get is why you and a couple other people in here get so offended because people are talking about it being a tech demo.
I've bolded sections that are either - contradictions, incoherent, or false logical progressions.

If you heard on the radio that someone is dead in a parkinglot, and I said with absolutle certainty "It was a suicide." would you then see how your logical progression is false? Because this is really what you're doing.

you said yourself at one point " ..we don't know what this thing is going to be." Yet continuously call it a tech demo. How can you do this when you admit that you obviously don't know what it is?

I have a reasonable position here to believe the game will be released on the 360 for example (press releases, in game footage shown running on next gen console, dev diaries, ask the developer segements).
You have absolutely NO reason to assume the game will not release, or that it is a tech demo. It doesn't matter how many times you post "I haven't seen anything, so it's a tech demo/not being released" that statement will be wrong a multiple levels every time.

Heck, even if the game isn't released; that still doesn't make it a tech demo. There are many games that have been canned by first-time developers or otherwise (frame city killer, thrill kill).

Now, what are you going to say if the game releases this summer? ... "oops" ??? you had no reason to believe it wasn't going to be in the first place. This game is like any of the other hundreds of other games that at some point had a TBA release date.

I'd also like to add that All-Pro Football 2k8 didn't have any gameplay footage at this point last year, so in all fairness it's not reasonable to expect more from 6 men (backbreaker team). Last I checked backbreaker hasn't been released, so they still have time to release footage (not that this magically makes the game more real)
 
# 58 jmood88 @ 05/16/08 06:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by allBthere
I've bolded sections that are either - contradictions, incoherent, or false logical progressions.
When you bold parts without the responses of course it doesn't look right but I was responding to things that you said so whatever contradictions you think there are they stem from your statements.

Quote:
If you heard on the radio that someone is dead in a parkinglot, and I said with absolutle certainty "It was a suicide." would you then see how your logical progression is false? Because this is really what you're doing.
That's not even close to what I've done.

Quote:
you said yourself at one point " ..we don't know what this thing is going to be." Yet continuously call it a tech demo. How can you do this when you admit that you obviously don't know what it is?
I did not call it a tech demo, I said that that is what it looks like right now and I gave reasons for why people are calling it a tech demo.

[quote]I have a reasonable position here to believe the game will be released on the 360 for example (press releases, in game footage shown running on next gen console, dev diaries, ask the developer segements).
Quote:
You have absolutely NO reason to assume the game will not release, or that it is a tech demo. It doesn't matter how many times you post "I haven't seen anything, so it's a tech demo/not being released" that statement will be wrong a multiple levels every time.
First of all, how in the world can you tell me that I'm "wrong" when you have no more information than I do? Second of all, I do have reason to think that this game might not come out and I've repeated it multiple times.

Quote:
Heck, even if the game isn't released; that still doesn't make it a tech demo. There are many games that have been canned by first-time developers or otherwise (frame city killer, thrill kill).
If it's not released then it's either a tech demo or a waste of time/money.
Quote:
Now, what are you going to say if the game releases this summer? ... "oops" ??? you had no reason to believe it wasn't going to be in the first place. This game is like any of the other hundreds of other games that at some point had a TBA release date.
I'll say "hey, Backbreaker just came out".

Quote:
I'd also like to add that All-Pro Football 2k8 didn't have any gameplay footage at this point last year, so in all fairness it's not reasonable to expect more from 6 men (backbreaker team). Last I checked backbreaker hasn't been released, so they still have time to release footage (not that this magically makes the game more real)
All Pro Football was made by a company that has made games before and was shown to the press. Also, All Pro Football was announced around January 07 and shown to magazines in March/April 07. Backbreaker was announced last November and we still haven't seen anything substantial.
 
# 59 allBthere @ 05/16/08 08:13 PM
[quote=jmood88;2038361995]When you bold parts without the responses of course it doesn't look right but I was responding to things that you said so whatever contradictions you think there are they stem from your statements.


That's not even close to what I've done.


I did not call it a tech demo, I said that that is what it looks like right now and I gave reasons for why people are calling it a tech demo.

Quote:
I have a reasonable position here to believe the game will be released on the 360 for example (press releases, in game footage shown running on next gen console, dev diaries, ask the developer segements).

First of all, how in the world can you tell me that I'm "wrong" when you have no more information than I do? Second of all, I do have reason to think that this game might not come out and I've repeated it multiple times.


If it's not released then it's either a tech demo or a waste of time/money.

I'll say "hey, Backbreaker just came out".



All Pro Football was made by a company that has made games before and was shown to the press. Also, All Pro Football was announced around January 07 and shown to magazines in March/April 07. Backbreaker was announced last November and we still haven't seen anything substantial.
bold #1 here's you pg. 17 official backbreaker: "you need to show more than short clips of a tech demo."

again: "If they had actually shown something other than tech demos I would have no problem getting excited about the game" ***that's called a contradiction

there are a bunch of others flat out calling it a tech demo too. Also the videos we've seen are "in-game footage running on next gen consoles".

Bold#2 - All of the information available points to the game being developed and eventually released on consoles. None of the information available indicates that it will not - that's why it's odd that you and others relentlessly call it a tech demo or deny it will be released. As I said, repeat yourself till you're blue in the face, and you'll still have no foundation for your argument every time. You haven't even provided a similar scenario which has lead you to believe what you do.

Bold#3, and I'll say - "why did you waste everyone's time trying to convince them the game isn't comming out or that it's a tech demo when you had no evidence or reasons to assume so?"

bold#4 - we actually didn't see anything substantial for all-pro until june 28 with the on the spot gameplay footage.

By reading over your posts I've realized that they actually have nothing to do with discussing backbreaker. They contribute nothing to those that have interest in the game. Why do you keep repeating yourself over and over? What is your reason for posting in the backbreaker threads? What do you feel you've contributed to the discussion?

your biggest points; they have never made a game before, and they haven't released as much information as other games, and their release date is TBA/// so what? we read that, and undertand that, what's the point in constantly posting that?
 
# 60 jmood88 @ 05/17/08 12:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigdmo9999
If this game was a tech demo, they would've let GTA speak on its behalf. Obviously they aren't making this game to put into more games because people have already seen GTA and probably are impressed, Madden people are. A TECH DEMO would be whatever T2 and R* saw when planning GTA IV. A GAME would be what we are seeing being made in the works. Just cause its a first time thing doesn't make it a tech demo, stop being so negative and cluttering this thread, please leave it to the people who actually care about this game
Showing the engine in GTA has nothing to do with showing what it could do in a football game. This thread isn't only for people who are excited about a game that has barely been seen. I'm not saying that it could be a tech demo because it's their first time making a game, I'm talking about it because of more than other reasons which I have said already.
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.