NBA 2K16 News Post

NBA 2K16 Player Ratings & Screenshots - Day Four: Kobe, Wall, Ross & More

06:34 PM - August 28, 2015 by Steve_OS

NBA players continue posting their NBA 2K16 player ratings, along with in-game screenshots of themselves in action. Below are the players that have either posted on Twitter, Facebook or Instagram today.

(Click the name(s) below, to see the screenshot.)

John Wall (Overall Rating - 87)
Kobe Bryant (Overall Rating - 85)
Aaron Brooks (Overall Rating - 75)
Terrence Ross (Overall Rating - 73)
Langston Galloway (Overall Rating - 72)
Anthony Tolliver - (Overall Rating - 70)

Previously confirmed player ratings: (Click the name(s) below, to see the screenshot)

Kevin Durant - (Overall Rating - 91)
Andre Drummond - (Overall Rating - 83)
Isaiah Thomas - (Overall Rating - 81)
Hassan Whiteside - (Overall Rating - 81)
Rudy Gobert - (Overall Rating - 79)
Jared Sullinger - (Overall Rating - 77)
Tony Wroten - (Overall Rating - 75)
C. J. Miles - (Overall Rating - 73)
Isaiah Canaan - (Overall Rating - 73)
Evan Fournier - (Overall Rating - 72)
Shelvin Mack - (Overall Rating - 72)
C.J. McCollum - (Overall Rating - 72)
Kyle Anderson - (Overall Rating - 71)
Shane Larkin - (Overall Rating - 70)
Spencer Dinwiddie - (Overall Rating - 70)
Quincy Acy - (Overall Rating - 69)
Perry Jones III - (Overall Rating - 69)
Pierre Jackson - (Overall Rating - 69)

Game: NBA 2K16Reader Score: 8/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PC / PS3 / PS4 / Xbox 360 / Xbox OneVotes for game: 45 - View All

NBA 2K16 Videos

Member Comments

# 81 23 @ 08/28/15 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LD2k


	No one here, internally and externally, is a bigger Kobe fan than I am... but I agree with 85 - coming off an injury last year & based on how the ratings have been constructed for NBA 2K16. Also not that worried because the Black Mamba will rise that # up this season.

Personal confession right there folks.

I'll translate. BEDs had no choice. He couldn't go under 85

# 82 23 @ 08/28/15 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LD2k


	No one here, internally and externally, is a bigger Kobe fan than I am... but I agree with 85 - coming off an injury last year & based on how the ratings have been constructed for NBA 2K16. Also not that worried because the Black Mamba will rise that # up this season.

On a more serious note, will he get to talk about other factors in ratings soon?

# 83 redsox4evur @ 08/28/15 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdionne17


	I put together a quick list of the revealed players ratings in order along with their rating change from the last official 2K15 roster in brackets. Note that there's no way for us to tell if rating downgrades/upgrades have happened due to position changes. Here you go: 1. Kevin Durant 91 (-3) 2. John Wall 87 (0) 3. Kobe Bryant 85 (0) 4. Andre Drummond 83 (-2) 5. Isaiah Thomas 81 (0) Hassan Whiteside 81 (0) 7. Rudy Gobert 79 (-2) 8. Jared Sullinger 77 (-3) 9. Aaron Brooks 75 (0) Tony Wroten 75 (-1) 11. Isiaiah Canaan 73 (+1) C.J. Miles 73 (0) Terrence Ross 73 (-1) 14. Evan Fournier 72 (0) Langston Galloway 72 (0) Shelvin Mack 72 (+2) C.J. McCollum 72 (+2) 18. Kyle Anderson 71 (+1) 19. Spencer Dinwiddie 70 (+3) Shane Larkin 70 (-1) 21. Quincy Acy 69 (-3) Pierre Jackson 69 (-) Perry Jones 69 (-3)

Drop everyone down 1 Lebron was shown at a 94.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ninja2K


	The guy has been injured but can anyone say if he manages to stay relatively healthy next year he isn't worthy of that rating?

If he was healthy for the past 2 years and put up those numbers he did I would not be complaining about his rating and maybe even saying he is underrated. But that hasn't happened. He hasn't played more than 50 games and had 2 serious injuries in these last 2 years.

# 84 rdionne17 @ 08/28/15 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redsox4evur


	Drop everyone down 1 Lebron was shown at a 94. If he was healthy for the past 2 years and put up those numbers he did I would not be complaining about his rating and maybe even saying he is underrated. But that hasn't happened. He hasn't played more than 50 games and had 2 serious injuries in these last 2 years.

Didn't know that! Thanks for the info, will correct my post.

# 85 MoneyOvaHuds @ 08/28/15 09:43 PM

I still don't see how Kobe should be under an 85 tho lol that's the highest rated on the Lakers ; next highest prob an 80 or 81 . Yes Kobe was hurt but it's still not that great of a sample size for him to be in 82 -83 range . Fundamentally Kobe still one of the best . Let's just hope his physical ability is lowered that's all that matters to me

# 86 derrtyRedd @ 08/28/15 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WaddupCouzin


	Aren't you buying the other game anyway, you can't edit his rating in that game! Haha! Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

No I'd never buy live I'm a 2k fan all the way

# 87 lakers24 @ 08/28/15 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoneyOvaHuds


	I still don't see how Kobe should be under an 85 tho lol that's highest rated on the Lakers , best highest prob an 80 or 81 . Yes Kobe was hurt but it's still not that great of a sample size for him to be in 82 -83 range . Fundamentally Kobe still one of the best . Let's just hope his physical ability is lowered that's all that matters to me

There's also so many other factors that goes into how he played last year. Kobe was obviously rusty to start out and had fatigued legs to end games which was to be expected given his previous injuries prevented him from working on his lower body. Then Byron burnt him out the first 2 months of the season, through all that though he had a few games where you could see he was still effective in a lot of areas.
His last 8 games though it seemed he found a balance finally but unfortunately he got hurt. In those final games he shot 37.7% from 3, 39.1% from 2 (in 6 of the 8 games he shot above 40%), averaged 14.6ppg, 7.6rpg, 8.1apg, and posted a TS% of 49.1% (season average was 47.7%). It's a small sample size, but you get the picture. Also, throughout the season he was surprisingly good at getting to the FT line even at his age averaging 7 FTA per with a FTr of 33.8% which is not far behind his career average of 38.8%.

# 88 LD2k @ 08/28/15 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 23


	Personal confession right there folks. I'll translate. BEDs had no choice. He couldn't go under 85

I told Stauff, if he does this, he gets no pink diamonds.

# 89 King_B_Mack @ 08/28/15 10:13 PM

Good question on the jersey customization front. In the last few 2Ks they've been including those special team patches when teams wear them that season. However those patches which are meant to be there for one season are pretty much there forever in our games. With the new customization tools at our disposal, I wonder if we'll be able to remove those patches after the season they're meant to commemorate or even add our own special patches to the current jerseys to celebrate special seasons?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

# 90 ojandpizza @ 08/28/15 10:58 PM

LeBron dropped off somewhat with his extremely high shooting efficiencies.. But man after the finals I can't imagine a 94 being fair.

Curious to what TT's rebounding ratings are. LeBron out-rebounded him (and everyone else in the finals) even with Thompson being much closer to the basket more often that Bron, but I'm sure his rebounding ratings are slightly too low again like they always are.

Interesting what his guard capabilities are as well. Averaged more assists than anyone in the finals as well with his top 2 scorers OUT, and JR shooting about as well as Shaq does. Also less turnovers than Curry despite his ridiculous usage rate and playing against the top defense in the league.

I'm just not sure man. He was putting up stats like guys from the damn 60's in today's league, and against the best defense in the league, and drops to a 94 because his shooting percentages was a littler lower? So are we going to lower MJ for the year he played Seattle and his shooting/turnovers were ridiculous?

I get it that he's declined some from his "freakish" athletic stage, but he's still a top 5 athlete in the league. Feels like he's being over penalized ever since he left being the cover boy. Especially considering you simulate a season and he averages like 21, 5, 5.. 2K being fishy.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

# 91 Eman5805 @ 08/28/15 11:01 PM

Not sure why this matters so much. These overalls aren't set in stone. Soon as some games are played, things will be adjusted accordingly.

# 92 SteveQ @ 08/28/15 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ojandpizza


	LeBron dropped off somewhat with his extremely high shooting efficiencies.. But man after the finals I can't imagine a 94 being fair. Curious to what TT's rebounding ratings are. LeBron out-rebounded him (and everyone else in the finals) even with Thompson being much closer to the basket more often that Bron, but I'm sure his rebounding ratings are slightly too low again like they always are. Interesting what his guard capabilities are as well. Averaged more assists than anyone in the finals as well with his top 2 scorers OUT, and JR shooting about as well as Shaq does. Also less turnovers than Curry despite his ridiculous usage rate and playing against the top defense in the league. I'm just not sure man. He was putting up stats like guys from the damn 60's in today's league, and against the best defense in the league, and drops to a 94 because his shooting percentages was a littler lower? So are we going to lower MJ for the year he played Seattle and his shooting/turnovers were ridiculous? I get it that he's declined some from his "freakish" athletic stage, but he's still a top 5 athlete in the league. Feels like he's being over penalized ever since he left being the cover boy. Especially considering you simulate a season and he averages like 21, 5, 5.. 2K being fishy. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I still feel he is the best in the league but honestly he did not have a good showing in the Finals. 94 for him is perfect. Keeping him the current best player while making him beatable.

# 93 SteveQ @ 08/28/15 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eman5805


	Not sure why this matters so much. These overalls aren't set in stone. Soon as some games are played, things will be adjusted accordingly.

Yeah and this too, people seem to forget that the ratings are always changing.

# 94 derrtyRedd @ 08/28/15 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redsox4evur


	OK...I'm just comparing two players who put up decent numbers for a bad team. Or a better player is Kevin Martin. Played in a close amount games 39, averaged 20 ppgs, right around 3 apg and 3 rpg. Should he be close to an 80, in your opinion?

I'd give him a 73.....75 tops, capable of being a great bench scorer, but he's lacking majorly on the defense

# 95 LO6IX @ 08/28/15 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eko718


	^^^Durant's decrease likely has much to do with his injury last year.

Durant's only real decline was in minutes played . That's it. His efficiency and production were typical for him if you factor his minutes. He showed his improved playmaking too. The only decline attribute-wise should be durability.

# 96 Yuss @ 08/28/15 11:11 PM

Meh, don't see how 2k is punishing Lebron when he's the highest rated player, will likely still have the most badges and will probably still be the easiest player in the game to use.

# 97 jfsolo @ 08/28/15 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MoneyOvaHuds


	I still don't see how Kobe should be under an 85 tho lol that's the highest rated on the Lakers ; next highest prob an 80 or 81 . Yes Kobe was hurt but it's still not that great of a sample size for him to be in 82 -83 range . Fundamentally Kobe still one of the best . Let's just hope his physical ability is lowered that's all that matters to me

If any other Laker is over 77, I'll be stunned. Can't wait to use them though, in games it's so much more interesting to me when you have to build your team up from the bottom.

# 98 MoneyOvaHuds @ 08/28/15 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfsolo


	If any other Laker is over 77, I'll be stunned. Can't wait to use them though, in games it's so much more interesting to me when you have to build your team up from the bottom.

Louis Williams or Hibbert could be an 80

# 99 ojandpizza @ 08/29/15 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yuss


	Meh, don't see how 2k is punishing Lebron when he's the highest rated player, will likely still have the most badges and will probably still be the easiest player in the game to use.

Not necessarily "punishing" him, it's just with 2K doing this "all time" scaling or whatever it is, his rating is likely going to be lower than most of all of the other big named legends.

I know he wasn't at his peak/best in the finals, but arguably no other player could put up 36/13/8 while playing under their norm in today's slower pace. Much less without their sidekick, alternate sidekick, and against the best team in the league. While leading both teams in points, rebounds, and assists... Idk I can just see the older guys going up, while some current guys are punished due to this likely over exaggerated new ratings system.

Just for comparison sake, Jordan in the finals against Seattle had a poor shooting series in the finals. Averaged 27/5/4 against a team that wasn't on par to this GS team, in a higher stat paced era, at a point in his career where he was a little past his athletic prime as well playing on the best team in the league.. I guarantee he's still a 99 for that season.

Likewise a good 3 point shooter from the 80's will likely have a higher scaled 3 point shot than someone from today with a slightly lower percentage from outside, even though they had about 3-5 extra feet of free room any time they had an outside look.

Idk, I just think this ratings system in general is going to hurt the more current players while bolstering the "legends" without considering all variables.

All things considered it's not a big deal I know, I just wish if 2K was really going to separate the past legends from other guys that they should do the same with current ones. I mean Durant is barely better than Kobe.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

# 100 24ct @ 08/29/15 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveQ


	I still feel he is the best in the league but honestly he did not have a good showing in the Finals. 94 for him is perfect. Keeping him the current best player while making him beatable.

How is 30+ pts 10+ rebounds & 7+ assists not a good showing bra? Lol smh...

Considering he had 0 offensive options and actually won 2 and could have been 7 games if 1 shot falls.

« Previous 1 2 3 456 7 8 9…12 13 Next »

More Links

NBA 2K16 Player Ratings & Screenshots - Day Four: Kobe, Wall, Ross & More