It may have come off a little insensitive IF Ramone said it like that, however, he didn't say it like that at all.
"There isn't any outside feedback that will be taken or listened to on this particular subject."
Sorry, that's precisely what that means. We're keeping this internal, and we will listen to no one on judgment except for ourselves because we have a specific method of doing this that we completely trust and consider incredibly important. Even if they've made a mistake from the point of view of multiple people. It resembles umpiring before the replay system came into play. Which is their right, of course, but you always hope for a fair and quick shake.
But you know what? This is like walking into a church and telling the people inside that their priest misquoted the Bible during his sermon and he should say it right. They're going to throw bricks, so I'll shut up and stop angering the tribe. It's still a brilliant game.
"There isn't any outside feedback that will be taken or listened to on this particular subject."
Sorry, that's precisely what that means. We're keeping this internal, and we will listen to no one on judgment except for ourselves because we have a specific method of doing this that we completely trust and consider incredibly important. Even if they've made a mistake from the point of view of multiple people. It resembles umpiring before the replay system came into play. Which is their right, of course, but you always hope for a fair and quick shake.
But you know what? This is like walking into a church and telling the people inside that their priest misquoted the Bible during his sermon and he should say it right. They're going to throw bricks, so I'll shut up and stop angering the tribe. It's still a brilliant game.
Or maybe they can't accept feedback because the color system is fully automated, and there is no opportunity for manual intervention?
And your church analogy fails because we are all in agreement on what Russell said, you are just misinterpreting the meaning and putting additional words in his mouth.
I would think so, almost would guarantee a Baez, and Soler.
I'd be more worried about if they got their face scans in. I've been worrying about guys like Marcus Stroman, Drew Hutchison, and Aaron Sanchez, if they got their face scans in.
I guess we can only hope.
If they got Baez in I pray they also changed how they handle players with "bat flicks/waves". I like that they made an attempt at them, but they looked really awkward in MLB 14. Look at how they did Ozuna.
If that is how they will do Baez's bat wave than I'll have to find an alternative stance. I hope they can figure out how to do the fast wave that most players have (if they have one to begin with). I don't know of many that have that slow wave pre-pitch that Ozuna had in MLB 14.
The team and player personality is going to keep this game fresh. Playing different teams with different animations instead of every team doing the same thing will make it more fun.
I like the birds in the sky too. I wonder if there will be seagulls in San Francisco.
The team and player personality is going to keep this game fresh. Playing different teams with different animations instead of every team doing the same thing will make it more fun.
I like the birds in the sky too. I wonder if there will be seagulls in San Francisco.
'birds in the sky'...........is that wishful thinking. I saw saw blades of grass being thrown to test the wind direction, but, if that was birds I stand corrected.....
I like the birds in the sky too. I wonder if there will be seagulls in San Francisco.
I just re-watched it and I didn't see any birds. I think you may have mistaken that for the grass the one guy threw in the air to tell win direction haha
"There isn't any outside feedback that will be taken or listened to on this particular subject."
Sorry, that's precisely what that means. We're keeping this internal, and we will listen to no one on judgment except for ourselves because we have a specific method of doing this that we completely trust and consider incredibly important. Even if they've made a mistake from the point of view of multiple people. It resembles umpiring before the replay system came into play. Which is their right, of course, but you always hope for a fair and quick shake.
But you know what? This is like walking into a church and telling the people inside that their priest misquoted the Bible during his sermon and he should say it right. They're going to throw bricks, so I'll shut up and stop angering the tribe. It's still a brilliant game.
Nope.
But time to move on, let's not totally de-rail the thread.
I just re-watched it and I didn't see any birds. I think you may have mistaken that for the grass the one guy threw in the air to tell win direction haha
Any idea when you guys think we will get real time LED boards with in game stats instead of just always seeing scrolling teams logos in all the stadiums?
Can someone tell me if they have discussed or mentioned anything about improved online play? I've been trying to find out and cant find anything. '14 looked good and obviously '15 does, but the online experience KILLED any sort of replay-ability for me. Warping players, ball in the dirt glitches, dropped games, etc etc etc. It was the worst experience I've had with the Show and my main focus is having that fixed.