Home
Madden NFL 15 News Post


EA Sports has released player and team ratings for the entire AFC and NFC South divisions. Click here to see the complete list of player ratings for both divisions.

AFC South
Indianapolis Colts - Overall 83
Houston Texans - Overall 76
Tennessee Titans - Overall 74
Jacksonville Jaguars - Overall 73

NFC South
New Orleans Saints - Overall 86
Carolina Panthers - Overall 84
Atlanta Falcons - Overall 79
Tampa Bay Buccaneers - Overall 77

Previously released Madden NFL 15 player ratings:

Madden NFL 15 screenshot gallery - Click to view Madden NFL 15 screenshot gallery - Click to view Madden NFL 15 screenshot gallery - Click to view Madden NFL 15 screenshot gallery - Click to view Madden NFL 15 screenshot gallery - Click to view Madden NFL 15 screenshot gallery - Click to view Madden NFL 15 screenshot gallery - Click to view Madden NFL 15 screenshot gallery - Click to view
Game: Madden NFL 15Reader Score: 6.5/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / PS4 / Xbox 360 / Xbox OneVotes for game: 42 - View All
Madden NFL 15 Videos
Member Comments
# 41 Yeah...THAT Guy @ 08/04/14 07:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Batum Shaka Laka
Glad that QB ratings seem to be on-point for a change.

Then you see Ryan Fitzpatrick as an 80 and Mike Glennon as a 79...

And no, I'm not saying Glennon should be higher than Fitz. I'm saying neither should be remotely that high lol.
 
# 42 Darth Aegis @ 08/04/14 07:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BreakingBad2013
Donnie Moore has given up.

I'm very disappointed that His only job is to rate players, and he can't do that correctly. Laziness.
Honestly I think this is pretty much the most accurate overall rosters we have had besides the players in the high 90's like Calvin Johnson. I'm not sticking up for him,but to say he's giving up and is lazy I think is unfair. Its what he thinks the ratings should be, just like if I was doing ratings I'm sure people would be bashing me for not putting there man crush higher, lol. What you posted isn't really constructive criticism.We all know most of the individual ratings dont really affect gameplay anyways.
 
# 43 Darth Aegis @ 08/04/14 07:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeah...THAT Guy
Then you see Ryan Fitzpatrick as an 80 and Mike Glennon as a 79...

And no, I'm not saying Glennon should be higher than Fitz. I'm saying neither should be remotely that high lol.
They both suck, seems pretty close to me, Glennon should probably be lower though, but I can live with it.
 
# 44 richiehero @ 08/04/14 07:45 PM
MLB Akeem Dent doesnt even play for the Falcons anymore. They traded him back in April... Really EA?!
 
# 45 Yeah...THAT Guy @ 08/04/14 07:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cutler23
They both suck, seems pretty close to me, Glennon should probably be lower though, but I can live with it.

I just think the gap between the Fitzpatricks and Glennons of the world compared to guys like Luck and Cam needs to be much much bigger.

Glennon has a cannon, but his accuracy numbers should be all be lower, along with stuff like throw on the run.
 
# 46 friscob @ 08/04/14 07:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeah...THAT Guy
I just think the gap between the Fitzpatricks and Glennons of the world compared to guys like Luck and Cam needs to be much much bigger.

Glennon has a cannon, but his accuracy numbers should be all be lower, along with stuff like throw on the run.
Throw on the run sure. But if you think his accuracy from the pocket is that much worse (if worse at all) than Cam then you're fooling yourself.
 
# 47 Yeah...THAT Guy @ 08/04/14 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by friscob
Throw on the run sure. But if you think his accuracy from the pocket is that much worse (if worse at all) than Cam then you're fooling yourself.

I can't see Cam and Luck's ratings right now, but I know what Glennons are. They are too high across the board, and Cam and Luck are both around that tier right after the elite QBs, whereas all Glennon has proven to this point is that he's a bottom of the barrel starter with a strong arm. And Fitz has proven himself to be a bottom of the barrel starter as well.
 
# 48 friscob @ 08/04/14 08:03 PM
Glennon
68 AWR, 95 thp, 79 short, 77 medium, 86 deep, 87 playaction, 75 on run

Cam
78 AWR, 97 thp, 85 short, 81 medium, 70 deep, 90 play action, 95 on run

Luck
81 AWR, 92 thp, 89 short, 84 medium, 74 deep, 78 play action, 87 run

Seems reasonable enough.
 
# 49 gr18 @ 08/04/14 08:15 PM
I can't for the .life of me figure out how he got the deep accuracy ratings.Looks like Case Keenum has the best at 90 followed by Matt Cassell at 86,while Brees is 81,Cam,Luck,Ben are in the 70's and Flacco in the 60's to name a few.Bizzaro world???
 
# 50 Yeah...THAT Guy @ 08/04/14 08:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by friscob
Glennon

68 AWR, 95 thp, 79 short, 77 medium, 86 deep, 87 playaction, 75 on run



Cam

78 AWR, 97 thp, 85 short, 81 medium, 70 deep, 90 play action, 95 on run



Luck

81 AWR, 92 thp, 89 short, 84 medium, 74 deep, 78 play action, 87 run



Seems reasonable enough.

I just don't think Glennon should be that close in short and medium, and shouldn't be that ridiculously good on the deep ball either. He's thrown some of the worst deep balls I've ever seen.

And Luck was rated as one of the best play action QBs in the NFL last year while Glennon was poor in that regard, yet Glennon has a huge advantage there.

At the end of the day, I just think there needs to be a much wider range in the ratings.

And the spreadsheet says Fitzpatrick throws a better deep ball than Luck and Cam too, doesn't it? The guys arm is too weak to even throw it down the field.
 
# 51 gr18 @ 08/04/14 08:40 PM
I see he uses PFF and for instance Matt Cassell did complete 9 of 15 deep passes he attempted last season.I'm quite sure career wise he's much lower.15 is a very low number to go off of and there are many variables that need to be taken in consideration.

In Madden terms,a qb with 86 accuracy would likely make a person attempt more than one or two passes a game with him.Online Case Keenum would be gunning downfield to Andre Johnson at a rate that isn't logical.I know there isn't more history to go by on Keenum or Glennon.

Maybe deep ball accuracy needs to be on a tighter and somewhat lower scale altogether.
 
# 52 Number999 @ 08/04/14 08:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gr18
I can't for the .life of me figure out how he got the deep accuracy ratings.Looks like Case Keenum has the best at 90 followed by Matt Cassell at 86,while Brees is 81,Cam,Luck,Ben are in the 70's and Flacco in the 60's to name a few.Bizzaro world???
I feel like he doesn't understand the basics of just... overall attempts. Why the hell is Flacco that low when he throws rainbows and his deep throws are usually very good? He may have a slightly poorer throwing percentage because he attempts it more often because it does work. I highly doubt if you asked Case Keenum to do that he'd be capable. Pretty annoying if you ask me.
 
# 53 gr18 @ 08/04/14 09:13 PM
I've always thought that was a strong point in Flacco's game.

Eli had an unusually bad year with deep accuracy but how many frustration throws,desperation throws,receivers not positioning themselves/breaking off,coverage.Brees was a little lower than usual last year but was the best over several years.

Each throw would have to be watched and analyzed.Typically shorter throws are can be more accurately interpreted just by looking at the numbers.
 
# 54 friscob @ 08/04/14 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSaints7
Aaron Rodgers: 92 Short, 88 Med, 90 Deep, 87 Play Action, 88 Throw on Run, 93 awareness
Drew Brees: 97 Short, 91 Med, 81 Deep, 86 Play Action, 76 Throw on Run, 98 awareness

Does that really merit Rodgers being 2 Overall Ratings higher?
It's probably Rodgers athleticism doing it.
 
# 55 Darth Aegis @ 08/04/14 09:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by richiehero
MLB Akeem Dent doesnt even play for the Falcons anymore. They traded him back in April... Really EA?!
Yeah the rosters aren't up to date or final. Im sure there will be a day one roster download.
 
# 56 JoshOutland @ 08/04/14 09:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrythm
Shoot, you ain't lying, LOL.

But hey, a masterful comeback against the Chiefs and their stout defense and to Luck's defense, 5 of those 7 interceptions came at a time where Kansas City and New England absolutely knew the Colts were abandoning the run, LOL.

Anyways, still, not a Power Run squad.

Stout defense before they lost several starters all at once and weren't able to rush the clock out due to their MVP candidate Charles going down as well.....
 
# 57 JoshOutland @ 08/04/14 09:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by friscob
Glennon
68 AWR, 95 thp, 79 short, 77 medium, 86 deep, 87 playaction, 75 on run

Cam
78 AWR, 97 thp, 85 short, 81 medium, 70 deep, 90 play action, 95 on run

Luck
81 AWR, 92 thp, 89 short, 84 medium, 74 deep, 78 play action, 87 run

Seems reasonable enough.
No way. Cam's deep accuracy needs to be higher.... his AWR should be higher since he's in his 4th season now.....his PA needs to be about 93 because he excels at it. Cam himself should be a 92 or 93 just like he ended the 2013 season. It's bull**** that he's back at where he started 2012 after having his best season in TDs, accuracy and wins.
 
# 58 raiderphantom @ 08/04/14 09:57 PM
Too many homers here. I've been very critical of Donny over the years but he's done a much better job with ratings recently.
 
# 59 richiehero @ 08/04/14 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cutler23
Yeah the rosters aren't up to date or final. Im sure there will be a day one roster download.
Yeah, but that was back in April. Come on now. Im not an EA *****, but thats kinda ridiculous.
 
# 60 William85 @ 08/04/14 10:26 PM
Cam Newtons stats were middle of the pack last year.

Comp % - 16th
Yards - 15th
Tds - 12th
QB Rating - 15th

As a passer , he is pretty average.
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.