I just saw these on FB. I still think this game could be pretty solid. I won't be getting a next-gen system until 2014 more than likely, but I'm still keeping a close eye on all these next-gen sports games. I think these screens are nice, and I'm ready to see more info this week.
The art style in this game is so DIFFERENT in comparison to 2K14. 2K going for that photorealistic look this game not so much.. Don't look downright terrible but it don't look nearly as good.
EA waited too long to get hype for their game going. I believe the other game has taken over the hype now. I want EA to succeed, but sales numbers are going to be the factor if this game gets to see the 2 or 3 year plan. The photos look alright, but don't have that next gen look.
EA waited too long to get hype for their game going. I believe the other game has taken over the hype now. I want EA to succeed, but sales numbers are going to be the factor if this game gets to see the 2 or 3 year plan. The photos look alright, but don't have that next gen look.
what makes you think live would have sold if they marketed the game the right way? lol, live 14 was never going to sell. I fully expect them to make their mark next year. beautiful screes btw
If they marketed the game the right way, then they would have sold a respectable amount of copies because of the next gen systems curiosity. People would have given them more of an opportunity if they would shown confidence in this game. By not showing enough on time can effect the possibility of there even being a Live 15 because EA has had a bad year financially.
The art style in this game is so DIFFERENT in comparison to 2K14. 2K going for that photorealistic look this game not so much.. Don't look downright terrible but it don't look nearly as good.
I was thinking the same thing. 2K goes for the more broadcast graphical look, while Live has the "on-court" or "in-person" look. That doesn't look BAD. But I think people are expecting a more "photorealistic" graphical style going into next-gen gaming. Live's graphics look really detailed, but it's like it's almost SO detailed it begins to look fake, and LOOK like a video game.
Hopefully, Live goes for photorealism or a "broadcast" look in the future.
I was thinking the same thing. 2K goes for the more broadcast graphical look, while Live has the "on-court" or "in-person" look. That doesn't look BAD. But I think people are expecting a more "photorealistic" graphical style going into next-gen gaming. Live's graphics look really detailed, but it's like it's almost SO detailed it begins to look fake, and LOOK like a video game.
Hopefully, Live goes for photorealism or a "broadcast" look in the future.
I don't mind these, i just want choice, to me 2K and Live give to very different experiences... i still rate NBA live 10 player controlled movement as one of the best we have ever had
i think the problem with live's players is the players are too shiny w/the lack of facial features, sweat, etc
really live had sweat in their games before 2k..thats one thing that i always liked about their game was that you could see the sweat dripping down their face during timeouts huddles..trust me its in the game lol...i didn't use the line on purpose by the way