Home
NCAA Football 14 News Post


The NCAA has decided today, unilaterally it appears, to not renew their license with EA Sports for the NCAA Football video game beginning next year.

In the statement, the NCAA said, "The NCAA has made the decision not to enter a new contract for the license of its name and logo for the EA Sports NCAA Football video game. The current contract expires in June 2014, but our timing is based on the need to provide EA notice for future planning. As a result, the NCAA Football 2014 video game will be the last to include the NCAA’s name and logo. We are confident in our legal position regarding the use of our trademarks in video games. But given the current business climate and costs of litigation, we determined participating in this game is not in the best interests of the NCAA."

EA should still be able to work out individual school, conference, awards, etc. licenses from the CLC -- which should mean the series should be able to live on. At the end of the day, this is the NCAA taking it's name and logo off of the game, but nothing more it appears. So while the series can't be called "NCAA Football" anymore, perhaps with the ESPN license the series can be called "EA Sports College Gameday 15" next season.

The only way this ends the NCAA Football series altogether is if one of two further scenarios happen: 1)If EA Sports decides it is done with the series altogether, which is doubtful given it's a top seller in the US. 2)If the CLC won't play ball with EA Sports, and thus EA has to negotiate licenses individually from member institutions

It is possible EA Sports will not continue development of the game after this year because of either reason, or because of fears of financial fallout from the Ed O'Bannon lawsuit. However, there is no guarantee EA will face huge financial problems from the O'Bannon lawsuit, and in a sense -- the threat of the O'Bannon lawsuit ending the series is the same today as it was yesterday.

I EA wants to they can continue the game with purely cosmetic changes and greater creative freedom without the NCAA hovering above the game. And let's face it, the less the NCAA is involved in anything, the better it will be.

So in a sense, the only thing different today versus yesterday with regards to the NCAA Football series is that it is no longer the NCAA Football series going forward. Everything thing else remains the same.

UPDATE: Brett McMurphy of ESPN is reporting ESPN has been told EA Sports will still have a college football video game beyond 2014, next year's game will be called College Football 15.

UPDATE #2: According to ESPN's Sports Business reporter Darren Rovell the CLC, which handles school, bowl, awards, etc. licensing, says it plans to work with EA in the future despite the NCAA dropping out.

UPDATE #3: EA Sports Executive Vice President Andrew Wilson speaks. In a statement, Wilson said, "EA SPORTS will continue to develop and publish college football games, but we will no longer include the NCAA names and marks. Our relationship with the Collegiate Licensing Company is strong and we are already working on a new game for next generation consoles which will launch next year and feature the college teams, leagues and all the innovation fans expect from EA SPORTS.

We took big creative strides with this year's college game and you’ll see much more in the future. We love college football and look forward to making more games for our fans."

Game: NCAA Football 14Reader Score: 8/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Xbox 360Votes for game: 54 - View All
NCAA Football 14 Videos
Member Comments
# 601 PackAttack @ 07/18/13 02:27 AM
Guess we're going to have to rename this forum to "College Football" and then rename the College Football forum to "NCAA Football". Or just name this "The Forum Formerly Known As NCAA Football".
 
# 602 sportzbro @ 07/18/13 02:39 AM
There is a ton of info and posts in this thread. Could someone give me a brief overview? I saw that NCAA pulled out of the contract, the game was dead, now it's saved.. Why... How?
 
# 603 franch1se @ 07/18/13 02:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghettogeeksta
I didn't see Ohio State, I guess they will have to make individual deals with schools not represented in the CLC.
yea, no USC or Oregon as well...they can't make a college football game and not have those schools in it.
 
# 604 sunless @ 07/18/13 02:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by XxJustAguessxX
Lol prized degrees, tell that to all the college graduates with these degrees and no job.......next.....hand outs, where ? Is the ncaa/ea not profiting of these guys likeness? If they are not, ill shut up and never comment again.
the ncaa and players have a very nice symbiotic relationship. 99% of the players get more than their fair share of the pie. o'bannon is just a greedy loser.
 
# 605 killrnut @ 07/18/13 02:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by franch1se
yea, no USC or Oregon as well...they can't make a college football game and not have those schools in it.

This is because tOSU, USC, Oregon, and some other schools do their licensing under CLPA, Collegiate Licensed Properties Association. CLPA is somewhat similar to CLC, but operates under a different model:

"The Collegiate Licensed Properties Association (CLPA) is a non-profit organization made up of colleges and universities who manage their own licensing program or partner with the Licensing Resource Group (LRG) for trademark management services. Together, these universities and LRG created the CLPA Authentication Program, which helps to protect university brands from the production and sale of counterfeit merchandise."

Member list: http://www.clpa.us/assets/pdfs/clpa-members.pdf

EDIT: I should probably put together a list of the Division 1-A teams under CLPA. There's a decent amount of them. Not to mention the Fiesta bowl and other bowls.
 
# 606 23 @ 07/18/13 03:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigMoneyAllDay
It might be called ESPN College Football 14.
Knowing EA's ego

It would be EA College Football 15 "featuring espn"
 
# 607 bad_philanthropy @ 07/18/13 03:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 23
Knowing EA's ego

It would be EA College Football 15 "featuring espn"
Heck, maybe "ESPN College Football 15"
 
# 608 smoove7 @ 07/18/13 03:16 AM
More money EA or ESPN? Winner winner ESPN dinner
 
# 609 jmik58 @ 07/18/13 03:22 AM
The removal of the NCAA from the game has no impact on whether a playoff will be included or not. EA didn't put the playoff into the game because of programming and space requirements to implement the change mid-dynasty. If NCAA Football 15 would have been around, the same playoff format we'll see next year would be included. Playoffs will be in next year's game to copy the real life setup.

Once again, the NCAA connection was purely cosmetic. Think of them as a logo and a name -- the same as having Denard Robinson on the cover. Next year someone else will be on the cover but the rest of the game won't be impacted by that.
 
# 610 bad_philanthropy @ 07/18/13 03:33 AM
So it seems like as long as the CLC and CLPA (and the relevant institutions and bowls they represent) are still interested in being in the game it should be business as usual minus the NCAA pennant logo here and there, and the use of the acronym.

Sounds like the "NCAA" name was kind of like the Madden name in recent Madden titles. It served more as a name brand identifier than any specific utility in the game's licensing of actual teams and leagues.
 
# 611 slick1ru2 @ 07/18/13 03:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmik58
The removal of the NCAA from the game has no impact on whether a playoff will be included or not. EA didn't put the playoff into the game because of programming and space requirements to implement the change mid-dynasty. If NCAA Football 15 would have been around, the same playoff format we'll see next year would be included. Playoffs will be in next year's game to copy the real life setup.

Once again, the NCAA connection was purely cosmetic. Think of them as a logo and a name -- the same as having Denard Robinson on the cover. Next year someone else will be on the cover but the rest of the game won't be impacted by that.
I think everyone knows that. However, NCAA was needed for the basketball NCAA tournament.

Perfect chance for EA to put the Div 1aa teams back in. Those were the days.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghettogeeksta
I didn't see Ohio State, I guess they will have to make individual deals with schools not represented in the CLC.

I did see the NCAA so I guess EA can just pay CLC to license NCAA that way, lol.
 
# 612 TreyIM2 @ 07/18/13 07:13 AM
I was going to skip NCAA Football 14 altogether but now I'm going to have to pick it up as a collector's item. I will wait til it's on the cheap, tho.
 
# 613 DetroitStyle @ 07/18/13 09:08 AM
Bringing it back!!!!!

 
# 614 rangerrick012 @ 07/18/13 09:23 AM
This is huge news. Even if cfb still goes on, this pretty much may kill any chance of a cbb game coming back since its impossible to have one without the ncaa tournament/March madness being officially represented.
 
# 615 DetroitStyle @ 07/18/13 09:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rangerrick012
This is huge news. Even if cfb still goes on, this pretty much may kill any chance of a cbb game coming back since its impossible to have one without the ncaa tournament/March madness being officially represented.
They could, they would just have to rename it. NCAA doesn't hold a license to a 68 team bracket. EA just wouldn't be able to use their name or logo.
 
# 616 rangerrick012 @ 07/18/13 09:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunless
the ncaa and players have a very nice symbiotic relationship. 99% of the players get more than their fair share of the pie. o'bannon is just a greedy loser.
How in the heck are obannon and other players in the wrong here? The ncaa uses these guys for things like video games and jerseys, while hoarding everything as a "non profit" organization.

Don't blame obannon, blame the ncaa for not giving its athletes the fair share. Anyone wanna guess how many #2 jerseys Texas a&m will sell this year? And how much of that goes to manziel? It's been a long time coming. Sucks that we lose out as gamers, but the players are totally within their rights from what I've read on the case.
 
# 617 rangerrick012 @ 07/18/13 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DetroitStyle
They could, they would just have to rename it. NCAA doesn't hold a license to a 68 team bracket. EA just wouldn't be able to use their name or logo.
Yeah but from what I've read here ea would have to pay teams individually instead of having them packaged together under ncaa. Combine that w the fact that ncaa basketball games have never made too much money, and I think it's more unlikely we'll see one anytime soon.
 
# 618 Herky @ 07/18/13 09:35 AM
I can't see a EA college football title lasting long without the NCAA license to be honest. They might be able to put back in cool last features such as suspension and celebrations, but I don't think they will be able to feature all the schools and conferences. Plus, would awards and bowls have their real life names attached to them? I don't want a Tangerine Bowl or National Title Bowl in place of real life bowl games and stadiums.

I just think this will end up being a peeled back version of what we are used to. The gameplay might be nice, but the realism, depth, and naming if schools/conferences/bowls/awards probably won't be the same.

I really hope 2K picks up the license but we are probably looking at a 2 year cycle before that is polished.

I have mixed feelings about EA losing the license. Yes they did get rather lazy on current gen with development, but they had the pieces in place. Now someone will have to start over on building a deep college football game.
 
# 619 Herky @ 07/18/13 09:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rangerrick012
How in the heck are obannon and other players in the wrong here? The ncaa uses these guys for things like video games and jerseys, while hoarding everything as a "non profit" organization.

Don't blame obannon, blame the ncaa for not giving its athletes the fair share. Anyone wanna guess how many #2 jerseys Texas a&m will sell this year? And how much of that goes to manziel? It's been a long time coming. Sucks that we lose out as gamers, but the players are totally within their rights from what I've read on the case.
Obannon is just mad because he didn't end up being an NBA player. Do you really think if he was playing in that league he'd care about this?

He's just a bitter former athlete who never made it big. Same with Sam Keller. Paying college kids opens up a can of worms because they you have to look at every single sport. Football on down to field hockey. How do you determine who gets what?

As a former Division 1 track athlete, I understand the difference between sports, the income they bring, being a poor college student athlete, and having the university make money off kids, but in the end these guys and gals are getting school paid for. They also get perks your average student doesn't get. I knew plenty of former teammates and players who had nice cars and got very good interest rates because of who they were. That's just one example but I could go on.

In short, if you want to pay players you have to pay all of them and how do you quantify who gets what?
 
# 620 EvanRG @ 07/18/13 09:43 AM
Why am I the only one excited about this news? I feel like if anything, EA can create a game more creatively, and not worry about what the big brother "NCAA" thinks of it. Their only hurdle is school approval, I guess.

Not to mention, if they continue to expand the EA Teambuilder feature, we'll not skip a beat. This is a purely cosmetic thing. Reminds me of the Pro Evolution Soccer series. They allow you to customize everything (including league logos). Heck, if EA added a simple league logo editor, we could get the NCAA logo and other related material back in the game scott-free.
 


Post A Comment
This thread has been closed for new comments.