04:45 PM - June 11, 2013 by TryHard_Nation
The folks at Tradition Sports Online nailed down the initial list of team ratings in NCAA Football 14. Have a look at all 126 teams and their ratings below:
What do you guys think?
NCAA Football 14 News Post
04:45 PM - June 11, 2013 by TryHard_NationThe folks at Tradition Sports Online nailed down the initial list of team ratings in NCAA Football 14. Have a look at all 126 teams and their ratings below:
What do you guys think?
NCAA Football 14 Videos
Member Comments
|
|||||||||||||
|
Oregon State is an 84?!?!?!?
Based on the other teams ratings, we got screwed! Kansas is an 81...Oregon State is an 84? WASHINGTON IS A 91!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????
These ratings are awful.
Nothing like a 9-4 team rated in the top 25 at the end of the year and brings back most of their team being rated right along with KANSAS!!!!!!!!!!
end rant
Based on the other teams ratings, we got screwed! Kansas is an 81...Oregon State is an 84? WASHINGTON IS A 91!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????
These ratings are awful.
Nothing like a 9-4 team rated in the top 25 at the end of the year and brings back most of their team being rated right along with KANSAS!!!!!!!!!!
end rant
Regardless of the fact that I"m a UVA fan, what in the hell is up with VT's offense being rated so high? Their defense should be in the 90s but there's no reason their offense should be.
Another question, why is our defense lower than the offense? I'd say the general consensus is that our offense is going to be terrible while our defense should be decent.
Seeing these ratings are what make me really question how big of college football fans these developers actually are. Most of these seem pretty ridiculous.
Another question, why is our defense lower than the offense? I'd say the general consensus is that our offense is going to be terrible while our defense should be decent.
Seeing these ratings are what make me really question how big of college football fans these developers actually are. Most of these seem pretty ridiculous.
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 106
Narcissiist @ 06/13/13 04:10 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
The two lowest-rated teams in the game (UMass and Georgia State) both won only once last year, and both wins were against 11-loss conference opponents.
There are two factors that give UMass a better ranking: they were playing a full MAC schedule in 2012 as opposed to GSt's transitional CAA schedule, and they performed better against common opponent ODU in 2011 when both were still in the FCS.
There are two factors that give UMass a better ranking: they were playing a full MAC schedule in 2012 as opposed to GSt's transitional CAA schedule, and they performed better against common opponent ODU in 2011 when both were still in the FCS.
# 108
johnson3384 @ 06/13/13 06:28 PM
Georgia State National Champs! Can't wait till I see that in my dynasty!
|
|||||||||||||
|
And you lost to Washington last season so I'm not sure why you're complaining about a team you lost to being ranked ahead of you. You don't recruit well and your coach can't put together less than 4 losses in a season. Mid 80s is about right.
Post A Comment
Working...