Home
MLB 13 The Show News Post


Thanks to chrisjohnson83 (who has already confirmed his legit copy of the game with me), we have screenshots of the overall team ratings for MLB 13 The Show. This includes batting, pitching and defensive team ratings.

The ratings are accurate as of the January 24th roster update, so there will probably be subtle changes before release date on March 5th.

Overall Team Rating
  • 1. Detroit Tigers
  • 2. St. Louis Cardinals
  • 3. Boston Red Sox
  • 4. Los Angeles Angels
  • 5. Toronto Blue Jays
  • 6. Texas Rangers
  • 7. Washington Nationals
  • 8. Atlanta Braves
  • 9. Cincinnati Reds
  • 10. Philadelphia Phillies
  • 11. New York Yankees
  • 12. Los Angeles Dodgers
  • 13. Colorado Rockies
  • 14. Chicago White Sox
  • 15. Arizona Diamondbacks
  • 16. Tampa Bay Rays
  • 17. San Francisco Giants
  • 18. Oakland Athletics
  • 19. Kansas City Royals
  • 20. Milwaukee Brewers
  • 21. Baltimore Orioles
  • 22. Pittsburgh Pirates
  • 23. Seattle Mariners
  • 24. Cleveland Indians
  • 25. San Diego Padres
  • 26. Minnesota Twins
  • 27. Chicago Cubs
  • 28. New York Mets
  • 29. Miami Marlins
  • 30. Houston Astros
Team Batting
  • 1. Detroit Tigers
  • 2. Los Angeles Angels
  • 3. Colorado Rockies
  • 4. Boston Red Sox
  • 5. Texas Rangers
  • 6. Toronto Blue Jays
  • 7. Cincinnati Reds
  • 8. St. Louis Cardinals
  • 9. Washington Nationals
  • 10. Los Angeles Dodgers
  • 11. New York Yankees
  • 12. Atlanta Braves
  • 13. Philadelphia Phillies
  • 14. Milwaukee Brewers
  • 15. Baltimore Orioles
  • 16. Arizona Diamondbacks
  • 17. Chicago White Sox
  • 18. Kansas City Royals
  • 19. Oakland Athletics
  • 20. Pittsburgh Pirates
  • 21. Cleveland Indians
  • 22. San Francisco Giants
  • 23. Seattle Mariners
  • 24. Tampa Bay Rays
  • 25. Miami Marlins
  • 26. New York Mets
  • 27. San Diego Padres
  • 28. Minnesota Twins
  • 29. Chicago Cubs
  • 30. Houston Astros
Team Pitching
  • 1. Philadelphia Phillies
  • 2. Washington Nationals
  • 3. Atlanta Braves
  • 4. St. Louis Cardinals
  • 5. Tampa Bay Rays
  • 6. New York Yankees
  • 7. Toronto Blue Jays
  • 8. Los Angeles Dodgers
  • 9. San Francisco Giants
  • 10. Boston Red Sox
  • 11. Cincinnati Reds
  • 12. Texas Rangers
  • 13. Detroit Tigers
  • 14. Los Angeles Angels
  • 15. Arizona Diamondbacks
  • 16. Oakland Athletics
  • 17. Chicago White Sox
  • 18. Kansas City Royals
  • 19. San Diego Padres
  • 20. Seattle Mariners
  • 21. Cleveland Indians
  • 22. Pittsburgh Pirates
  • 23. Colorado Rockies
  • 24. Milwaukee Brewers
  • 25. Baltimore Orioles
  • 26. Chicago Cubs
  • 27. Minnesota Twins
  • 28. New York Mets
  • 29. Houston Astros
  • 30. Miami Marlins
Team Defense
  • 1. New York Yankees
  • 2. Los Angeles Dodgers
  • 3. Los Angeles Angels
  • 4. Tampa Bay Rays
  • 5. Cincinnati Reds
  • 6. Philadelphia Phillies
  • 7. Atlanta Braves
  • 8. Chicago Cubs
  • 9. Baltimore Orioles
  • 10. San Francisco Giants
  • 11. Texas Rangers
  • 12. Washington Nationals
  • 13. Colorado Rockies
  • 14. St. Louis Cardinals
  • 15. Boston Red Sox
  • 16. Kansas City Royals
  • 17. Arizona Diamondbacks
  • 18. San Diego Padres
  • 19. Detroit Tigers
  • 20. Houston Astros
  • 21. Pittsburgh Pirates
  • 22. Cleveland Indians
  • 23. Seattle Mariners
  • 24. Oakland Athletics
  • 25. Miami Marlins
  • 26. Toronto Blue Jays
  • 27. Minnesota Twins
  • 28. Milwaukee Brewers
  • 29. Chicago White Sox
  • 30. New York Mets

MLB 13 The Show screenshot gallery - Click to view MLB 13 The Show screenshot gallery - Click to view
Game: MLB 13 The ShowReader Score: 9/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS Vita / PS3Votes for game: 36 - View All
MLB 13 The Show Videos
Member Comments
# 361 bdubz91 @ 03/04/13 12:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cardinalbird7
What does 3 years ago have to do with anything? I don't think you guys realize how the rankings work for the 301,899th time. If you like the Giants, use the Giants. They are going to represent pretty accurately how they play in real life. They are not going to give them a magical "team chemistry" boost to make them play like the best team ever, because they won the world series 2 out of 3 years.
You are obviously upset the Cardinals lost to the Giants, that aside, people are going to be more likely to not play as them due to the low rankings, and there is no way they are the worst team in the NL West...
 
# 362 HustlinOwl @ 03/04/13 09:59 AM
Giants #16 in other baseball game, they are clearly not the best team in baseball
http://www.operationsports.com/forum...post2044768475
Quote:
For those interested, here is the team ratings in ranked order:

1. Angels - 95
2. Reds - 95
3. Nationals - 93
4. Blue Jays - 91
5. Rangers - 91
6. Tigers - 91
7. Dodgers - 90
8. Braves - 89
9. Red Sox - 89
10. Yankees - 89
11. Cardinals - 88
12. DBacks - 88
13. Phillies - 88
14. Rockies - 88
15. White Sox - 88
16. Giants - 87
17. Rays - 87
18. A's - 86
19. Brewers - 86
20. Orioles - 86
21. Pirates - 85
22. Royals - 85
23. Cubs - 84
24. Mets - 82
25. Indians - 81
26. Mariners - 80
27. Padres - 79
28. Twins - 78
29. Astros - 75
30. Marlins -75
 
# 363 MrOldboy @ 03/04/13 10:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HustlinOwl
Giants #16 in other baseball game, they are clearly not the best team in baseball
http://www.operationsports.com/forum...post2044768475
That is odd how they lined up like that. So close to matching.
 
# 364 cardinalbird5 @ 03/04/13 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdubz91
You are obviously upset the Cardinals lost to the Giants, that aside, people are going to be more likely to not play as them due to the low rankings, and there is no way they are the worst team in the NL West...
Good reasoning. I guess the same reasoning the Giants fans are upset they are ranked low and not the best team in the game. Stop being biased. They rate players on an individual basis. They aren't going to give Posey, Sandoval, Crawford, etc. boosted ratings just so their overall team ranking can be higher.

Look at the players' stats from the past 3 years then look at their individual attributes this year and you'll see SCEA doesn't look to give attributes based to compensate for low team rankings. They give them out based off algorithms, data, and statistics of how the players actually played.

Clearly you giants fans know more though with the type of convincing posts you all made, so I'll just stop. Giants should be number 1 because they won the WS. Cards should have been number 1 for MLB 2007 since they won it in 2006 too right?
 
# 365 Cavicchi @ 03/04/13 10:38 AM
If you look at the players potentials, the Giants have quite a few, including Lincecum at A potential. So even though the team is rated low, they have lots of players with A and some B potentials that should mean they will be very competitive.
 
# 366 MrOldboy @ 03/04/13 10:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cavicchi
If you look at the players potentials, the Giants have quite a few, including Lincecum at A potential. So even though the team is rated low, they have lots of players with A and some B potentials that should mean they will be very competitive.
Over time you mean right? I never thought of that actually. Makes sense if a team has more high potential players it could sustain itself longer.
 
# 367 cardinalbird5 @ 03/04/13 11:33 AM
All I know is the Cards will have one of the best lineups followed by a balanced rotation and a good bullpen. That is all that matter's to me. I could care less if they are ranked 29th, 17th, or 1st. I am going to be using them a lot.

12 in 13!
 
# 368 Majingir @ 03/04/13 05:55 PM
After seeing each players rating, it's easy to see how each team is rated
where they are in fielding rating.

Almost entire Yankees fielders are 80+. Red Sox have a few like that too.

David Ortiz is supposedly a better fielder than Edwin Encarnacion.

Ratings bit strange though.

Jeter:
79 arm strength
64 arm accuracy
71 reaction
82 fielding rating

Reyes:
82 arm strength
63 arm accuracy
81 reaction
74 fielding


How does that make sense? Both are SS......

Fielding is a separate rating too,but if it was just the average of the only 3 fielding categories in the game then Reyes would be 75 fielding and Jeter at 71
 
# 369 Cavicchi @ 04/13/13 12:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Majingir
After seeing each players rating, it's easy to see how each team is rated
where they are in fielding rating.

Almost entire Yankees fielders are 80+. Red Sox have a few like that too.

David Ortiz is supposedly a better fielder than Edwin Encarnacion.

Ratings bit strange though.

Jeter:
79 arm strength
64 arm accuracy
71 reaction
82 fielding rating

Reyes:
82 arm strength
63 arm accuracy
81 reaction
74 fielding


How does that make sense? Both are SS......

Fielding is a separate rating too,but if it was just the average of the only 3 fielding categories in the game then Reyes would be 75 fielding and Jeter at 71
David Ortiz made just one single error at 1B from 2009 through 2012. Well, it was a total of 19 games at first base. He really is a DH.

I would like to know where the range factor rating is shown in attributes, Reaction?
 
# 370 bkrich83 @ 04/13/13 12:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cavicchi
David Ortiz made just one single error at 1B from 2009 through 2012. Well, it was a total of 19 games at first base. He really is a DH.

I would like to know where the range factor rating is shown in attributes, Reaction?
I would assume range would be a combination of reaction and speed, wouldn't it? Reaction is how well they get a jump of the bat, and speed would be how much ground they cover. I imagine "fielding" factors in to how good of a path they take to the ball and also how reliable they are at avoiding errors.

Just assumptions.
 
# 371 Cavicchi @ 04/13/13 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkrich83
I would assume range would be a combination of reaction and speed, wouldn't it? Reaction is how well they get a jump of the bat, and speed would be how much ground they cover. I imagine "fielding" factors in to how good of a path they take to the ball and also how reliable they are at avoiding errors.

Just assumptions.
I think you're right, range being a combination of reaction and speed. I also think you're explanation for fielding is correct, sure seems logical.
 
# 372 HustlinOwl @ 04/30/13 11:24 AM
so how bout those rankings lmao Angels and Blue Jays
 
# 373 bkrich83 @ 04/30/13 09:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HustlinOwl
so how bout those rankings lmao Angels and Blue Jays
What happened to all the outraged Jays fans?

I think the Angels being rated too high was predictable given the state of their bullpen and overall pitching staff.
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.