02:53 PM - May 14, 2010 by Solidice
Larry Richart, Associate Designer on NCAA Football 11 has posted a new blog. This one focusing on the quarterbacks.
|
|||||||||
|
NCAA Football 11 News Post
02:53 PM - May 14, 2010 by SolidiceLarry Richart, Associate Designer on NCAA Football 11 has posted a new blog. This one focusing on the quarterbacks.
NCAA Football 11 Videos
Member Comments
# 2
moylan1234 @ 05/14/10 03:04 PM
I'm really glad they've adressed the throwing out of a sack stuff that was done really poorly last year. suprised they didn't mention throwing motions or more ratings, but at least we know size/strength will matter for QBs this year
"We have also spent some time tuning the passes in general when throwing out of sacks. Obviously when a QB his hit during his throw he won't have the same zip as if he was standing upright in the pocket with nobody around him. Therefore, even on accurate passes, the QB will not be able to throw the ball as far or on the same trajectory as a regular bullet pass. You will also see the ball flutter a bit more as it's hard to get off a perfect spiral when a defender is all over you. We've tuned back the trajectory of the uncontrolled floaters that often times were turned into pick sixes. These passes will more often than not fall harmlessly to the ground."
Finally! Sounds good to me.
Finally! Sounds good to me.
Sounds good.
Would love to hear something on the pass speeds being fixed. No more 60 yard bullet passes or deep outs to the far hash?
Would love to hear something on the pass speeds being fixed. No more 60 yard bullet passes or deep outs to the far hash?
When I first read "Defending Dual-Threat QBs" I was really hoping they had fixed the pass rush so that DEs get upfield quicker in order to keep the QB in the pocket, but instead, it's just a way to set up the same contain assignment that we've had for years faster. Most disappointing blog so far, not much there. No mention of new throwing animations, realistic pass speed/trajectories, new QB ratings, etc.
It's nice that they've worked on the throw-out-of-sack passes though. I got tired of my QB floating a pass right in the middle of 3 defenders anytime someone so much as breathed on him while he was throwing.
It's nice that they've worked on the throw-out-of-sack passes though. I got tired of my QB floating a pass right in the middle of 3 defenders anytime someone so much as breathed on him while he was throwing.
# 6
SteelerSpartan @ 05/14/10 03:40 PM
I'll believe when I see it................when it comes to them finally stopping scrambling cheese
For one, the main problem with Scrambling is that the DEs don't rush right,and EA refuses to fix that
and the 2nd is they still have unrealistic QB movement.........theres hardly any foot planting and they all can turn their bodies like Vick
I seriously think its a design decision......I think they're afraid to po the cheesers who make up 95% of Online players
For one, the main problem with Scrambling is that the DEs don't rush right,and EA refuses to fix that
and the 2nd is they still have unrealistic QB movement.........theres hardly any foot planting and they all can turn their bodies like Vick
I seriously think its a design decision......I think they're afraid to po the cheesers who make up 95% of Online players
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
WOOT!!!!
I'm really liking what I see nowadays and will certainly pick this up at release.
One thing I wish was addressed though is the lineup before the snap.
I wish players would be moving around at all times (also more disguising the D etc..) instead of a static setup.
Not saying they need to be running around at all times or even moving around on the field...but rather just moving and not "locked" in place.
I know I'm probably not explaining it very good so I'll leave it at that.
One thing I wish was addressed though is the lineup before the snap.
I wish players would be moving around at all times (also more disguising the D etc..) instead of a static setup.
Not saying they need to be running around at all times or even moving around on the field...but rather just moving and not "locked" in place.
I know I'm probably not explaining it very good so I'll leave it at that.
Why does the guy covering the right slot WR have his outside foot back? Not a bad blog, but nothing really flashy like every other one. Rather boring....
# 12
jclentzthadon @ 05/14/10 04:37 PM
Yeah nothing crazy here but still solid. I like that contain feature the implemented that will allow you to quickly put DE's in contain.
I would have like to hear more about ratings like the short, middle and deep accuracy as well as the rocket arm throwing that was in last year. I'm sure they will lead into that at some point.
Good stuff and looking forward to it. A lot of gameplay stuff being addressed, and rightfully so.
I would have like to hear more about ratings like the short, middle and deep accuracy as well as the rocket arm throwing that was in last year. I'm sure they will lead into that at some point.
Good stuff and looking forward to it. A lot of gameplay stuff being addressed, and rightfully so.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
I like what they are doing and that they are trying, BUT
The major problem with the QB countain feature is that this is an NFL defensive scheme, not college. The foundation of all college teams is get to the QB, period. With most DE's being undersized (converted LB's most schools) the focus is SPEED on the outside rush. Because of the talent level, 98% of schools send/attack with their DE's to initiate some type of rush. They can't afford not to send, instead a Cover 2 scheme is used to keep Corner's on edge to help with scrambling QB's, which is why we see so many deep fade's/crosses converted in the college game.
This is as many gamers wrote previously, how in trying to fix one thing, they have created a problem in another area.
They could easily fix the issue with fast/moible QB's breaking the game by making FATIGUE operate as it should. Or increasing possibility of injury
Thus they wouldn't have to install items that simply don't fit the college game.
-When QB's are tired, thei passes have more air and are less accurate.
-They tend to fumble (which has yet to make the game) exchange's and on runs.
I remember the '09 Demo showed how Fatigue would affect player's, yet it seemed to have been scrapped.
There was such a problem with QB pressure the past 3 years, that the last thing would be to take away rusher's from the line.
Still can't wait, but this one has me going "Koo-Koo"
The major problem with the QB countain feature is that this is an NFL defensive scheme, not college. The foundation of all college teams is get to the QB, period. With most DE's being undersized (converted LB's most schools) the focus is SPEED on the outside rush. Because of the talent level, 98% of schools send/attack with their DE's to initiate some type of rush. They can't afford not to send, instead a Cover 2 scheme is used to keep Corner's on edge to help with scrambling QB's, which is why we see so many deep fade's/crosses converted in the college game.
This is as many gamers wrote previously, how in trying to fix one thing, they have created a problem in another area.
They could easily fix the issue with fast/moible QB's breaking the game by making FATIGUE operate as it should. Or increasing possibility of injury
Thus they wouldn't have to install items that simply don't fit the college game.
-When QB's are tired, thei passes have more air and are less accurate.
-They tend to fumble (which has yet to make the game) exchange's and on runs.
I remember the '09 Demo showed how Fatigue would affect player's, yet it seemed to have been scrapped.
There was such a problem with QB pressure the past 3 years, that the last thing would be to take away rusher's from the line.
Still can't wait, but this one has me going "Koo-Koo"
|
|||||||||||||
|
# 17
TracerBullet @ 05/14/10 04:59 PM
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
I'm still concerned with the positioning of that WR though. Don't think he should be that wide.
# 19
TracerBullet @ 05/14/10 05:04 PM
I agree that he shouldn't, seeing as he probably is only a few yards, if that, from the sideline.
|
|||||||||||||
|
Post A Comment
Working...