MLB 10 News Post

MLB '10: The Show Rosters: OS Full Minors V.1

09:24 PM - April 6, 2010 by RidinDwnKingsley

OK guys, here it is.

Any suggestions, fixes or edits should be posted here. If you have any questions on how to get the rosters working, make sure you check this thread first.

Sportsconnect

Title: OSFullMinors2010V.1

Manual Download Here

All real players
Faces for the entire NL East and top 5-10 prospects for each team
Opening day lineups/rotations
Every player on a MLB roster is included
AAA lineups/rotations best as possible
Great for franchise play

Thanks to Knight for letting me join the cause and to Ksig for his excellent scouting and potential matches. I'm sure Knight will be around to provide input on V.2.

Game: MLB '10: The ShowReader Score: 9/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3Votes for game: 66 - View All

MLB '10: The Show Videos

Member Comments

# 461 mikemulloy @ 04/09/10 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ksig24


	Dude, IMHO it really depends on the coaches when you get to rookie ball. When I got to rookie ball all they wanted to do was change my swing. I have seen sub-par hitters make the show because of progressive hitting coaching. Danny Dorn and Justin Turner are perfect examples of what good hitting coaches can do for you. If Matt Williams works with Davidson, the kid will become more aware of what he is trying to do at the plate instead of always looking for a ball to pull over the gate. He needs to mature more as a professional hitter and realize the pitching he is facing is much more polished and that he cant mash everyone he faces.

fair enough. you dont think parker is the best of that group though? despite his injury i still think he'll be the best of that group

# 462 DodgerFanatic2K3 @ 04/09/10 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mvp90805


	i dont know to post it here or somewere else but.. Carlos Monasterios pitcher of the dodgers was trowing a sick changeup against the pirates and its missiing it on the rosters

Ya I noticed that right away and fixed it, his sick changeup is the reason he made the team LOL

# 463 ksig24 @ 04/09/10 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikemulloy


	fair enough. you dont think parker is the best of that group though? despite his injury i still think he'll be the best of that group

I do, but at this point he should be more advanced. I will take Borchering as the future top 50 guy out of the group.

# 464 callmetaternuts @ 04/09/10 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ksig24


	You would hate too if your "friend" acted like he does now. I mean be honest, if you were talking to your "friend" and he was constantly looking around at everyone else, no personalization to the conversation and acting too cool you would be annoyed too. Even in our Facebook pics he takes pictures now like he is the guest of honor just to be in the pics, annoying, but I guess thats what 80 MM will do to you.

$80MM? I think that's pushing it a little bit. Even with club options being guaranteed it gets to about $45MM with his incentives for MVP and such.

# 465 23Rampage23 @ 04/09/10 03:44 PM

Not sure if anyone mentioned it or not (I checked the first 20 or so pages) but Arodys Vizcaino is no longer in the Yankees minor league system, he was traded to the Braves in the Javier deal.

# 466 mikemulloy @ 04/09/10 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by callmetaternuts


	$80MM? I think that's pushing it a little bit. Even with club options being guaranteed it gets to about $45MM with his incentives for MVP and such.

ya ksig that was a bit of an exaduration. the contract max's out at around 55 if im not mistaken, plus he's only recieved the 3mil signing bonus and .5m from last year and this year. unless he calls j.g. wentworth and tells them that it's his money and he wants it now

# 467 ksig24 @ 04/09/10 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikemulloy


	ya ksig that was a bit of an exaduration. the contract max's out at around 55 if im not mistaken, plus he's only recieved the 3mil signing bonus and .5m from last year and this year. unless he calls j.g. wentworth and tells them that it's his money and he wants it now

You know that I think this year he makes a milli. I was never too sure of the actual contract, but he was talking 80+ in incentives etc. Im not hating on the dudes paper chase, Im just saying money changes people. its strange. Some people forget where they came from..

# 468 callmetaternuts @ 04/09/10 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ksig24


	You know that I think this year he makes a milli. I was never too sure of the actual contract, but he was talking 80+ in incentives etc. Im not hating on the dudes paper chase, Im just saying money changes people. its strange. Some people forget where they came from..

Straight from the horse's mouth so to speak

6 years/17.5M (2008-13), plus 2014-16 club options

signed extension with Tampa Bay 4/18/08
08:$0.5M, 09:$0.55M, 10:$0.95M, 11:$2M, 12:$4.5M, 13:$6M, 14:$7.5M club option ($3M buyout), 15:$11M club option, 16:$11.5M club option

Thats a max of $44MM and once you consider incentives, bonuses and such, it will probably crack $50MM, but thats about it. This is why Longo will be the best value in baseball for the next 4 years or so. Ridiculous contract the Rays signed him to.

# 469 Infinite202 @ 04/09/10 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Volkswagen3


	They took out all the uneditable developers fake players and placed them on the free agent list therefore some real players had to be put on certain teams since the free agent list capacity is now mostly filled will fake players. I think this is the right way to do it even though some players no longer play for a specific team, I'd rather have a real former player than a fake one on the roster. Also, just put the former players on the Class A holding area and you won't even have to use them in a game. Hope this explains it right.

Thank you for posting those corrections.

Would anybody mind posting all the players that are on MLB squads that don't belong (like Paul Byrd)?

# 470 dickwhite77 @ 04/09/10 05:43 PM

amazing work on these rosters...just got mine and can't wait too start a franchise with my cubs...thank you

# 471 Vanman2425 @ 04/09/10 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rondoman


	Ksig, What is your opinion of Jeffress the pitcher for teh Brewers who got caught smoking weed like twice now?? Will he ever amount to anything as I was pretty high on him at one point.

Rimshot needed.

# 472 coreyhartsdaughter @ 04/09/10 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rondoman


	Ksig, What is your opinion of Jeffress the pitcher for teh Brewers who got caught smoking weed like twice now?? Will he ever amount to anything as I was pretty high on him at one point.

I think he's slated to be a closer in high A ball (the Manatees I believe).

# 473 GOS79 @ 04/09/10 06:32 PM

Knight/KSig/Ridin/Strut...All involved.

Thanks for your time and effort...Really..

I would like to ask a question - ....I am the type that loves to draft a team and value the realism of the game. However, it is very disappointing how many of the video sports game end up with unrealistic fantasy draft results. Maybe when you apply realistic attributes to a young player, the 'computer' does not value them. How much value do you guys put on the results of a fantasy draft in the Show with the rosters you create?...Do you guys ever refer to that?..Is it all non-related?...

I seen that ver.1 has Heyward & Strasburg ranked very high, and the computer acknowledges that by drafting them in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, if I am not mistaken. Which I think is great and very realistic. However, the computer is drafting Chone Figgins in the top 10 overall in the first round. This is something 100% of GM's wont do.

I hope you understand my thoughts, and thanks for taking the time to read.

# 474 D3C4K @ 04/09/10 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOS79


	Knight/KSig/Ridin/Strut...All involved. Thanks for your time and effort...Really.. I would like to ask a question - ....I am the type that loves to draft a team and value the realism of the game. However, it is very disappointing how many of the video sports game end up with unrealistic fantasy draft results. Maybe when you apply realistic attributes to a young player, the 'computer' does not value them. How much value do you guys put on the results of a fantasy draft in the Show with the rosters you create?...Do you guys ever refer to that?..Is it all non-related?... I seen that ver.1 has Heyward & Strasburg ranked very high, and the computer acknowledges that by drafting them in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, if I am not mistaken. Which I think is great and very realistic. However, the computer is drafting Chone Figgins in the top 10 overall in the first round. This is something 100% of GM's wont do. I hope you understand my thoughts, and thanks for taking the time to read.

I do a ton of fantasy drafts, to get a feel for attribute structure and how players are ranked/valued by position, and I noticed what you were referring to. I think Chone's high draft selection has to do with his move from 3rd to 2nd base after the SCEA roster update. Default rosters have him going lower, and ranked as a "B" tier player overall, while after the change he's now valued as an "A" tier guy. Maybe it's because his speed and fielding ratings are more significant as a 2B, maybe it's the difference of being not being compared to A-Rod and Longoria, but the position change is the reason for his higher ranking in the fantasy draft. I just lowered his contact and power ratings a bit to get him where I think he should be, ranking wise. Hope that helps.

# 475 moss84_18 @ 04/09/10 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ksig24


	Well, my reasoning has to be something along the lines of where I think he will settle in as well as his tool set. I know he can rake, but at this point the Brewers are starting to see somewhat of an ROI on Weeks and if he remotely stays consistent than you can say bye, bye to Lawrie somewhat in the mold of Gamel is. Weeks can run, hit for power and average and field. Those are 3 above average tools that made him the second pick in the draft. Lawrie is a big bodied offensive 2B with only two average or above tools: hit bat. They are good tools, but Gamel can also rake as well and where is he? Remember this is a game and you have complete control over what your rosters look like, so insert Lawrie as your 2B of the future and mash with him and watch him become a superstAr!

o i didnt know that you took into account who is in front of players to determine potential. i just thought you took them by their own skills. makes some sense i guess. but personally i see weeks as our future CF and lawrie at 2B.

# 476 huskerfan4life @ 04/09/10 07:42 PM

hey RAZR when are we going to start on the pitch edits and stuff for the next version?

# 477 B_rad13 @ 04/09/10 07:56 PM

Just wondering does anyone of you three do equipments edits for the rosters?

# 478 myeags @ 04/09/10 07:57 PM

I want to thank Knight and the OS community for another year of great rosters. I can't wait to add music and start my season.

# 479 RAZRr1275 @ 04/09/10 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by huskerfan4life


	hey RAZR when are we going to start on the pitch edits and stuff for the next version?

It's probably going to be a while. I'll let you know.

# 480 coreyhartsdaughter @ 04/09/10 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moss84_18


	o i didnt know that you took into account who is in front of players to determine potential. i just thought you took them by their own skills. makes some sense i guess. but personally i see weeks as our future CF and lawrie at 2B.

Carlos Gomez is 24 years old. I'd assume if he has anything near a decent season, expect a long term deal.

« Previous 1 2…21 22 232425 26 27…78 79 Next »

More Links

MLB '10: The Show Rosters: OS Full Minors V.1