Madden 2010 News Post

Madden NFL 10: All Player Ratings Revealed (Pasta Padre)

07:05 PM - June 14, 2009 by vannwolfhawk

Pasta Padre has posted all of the Madden NFL 10 ratings, via an Excel spreadsheet.

Quote:


	"I am really looking forward to seeing how the spread out ratings affect the game. It makes the strengths and weaknesses of each team apparent and depth becomes more important. Users will have to strategically consider each team�s personnel. It should really open things up with the games better resembling what would be seen in the NFL."

Game: Madden NFL 10Reader Score: 7.5/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Wii / Xbox 360Votes for game: 76 - View All

Madden NFL 10 Videos

Member Comments

# 61 tooldude79 @ 06/14/09 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a4reak


	I think everyone has a beef w/ the ratings, however I kinda feel like your making this out to be a way bigger catastrophe then it was

youre probably right...im an NFL junkie...and i would just hope that the only NFL game available would have an accurate representation of the talent in the league...maybe im just a dreamer

# 62 CKW11 @ 06/14/09 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyboxer


	With the revamped ratings system and having players more spread out, I think it will be great. I'm just taking it for what it is. . I'm thinking it's going to allow for true subbing for specific situations. If they are in fact spread out ,each player regardless of overall will have their own areas of strengths. So possibly instead of always just making sure your hightest rated overall player is in the game, you'll have to dig a little deeper. So there may be times you actually have a player rated a little lower overall that simply fits the situation (or team philosophy) better.. That's how how looking at it anyways.. Hope I'm right.

I hope you're right too, that would add alot more strategy to the game which would be great imo.

And i think everyone is focusing too much on the actual number ratings. I cant sit here and criticize the ratings because i dont know how they actually play. Just my 2 cents.

# 63 18manning18 @ 06/14/09 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooldude79


	i mustve mixed 07(16) and 08(13)..either way..compare the ratings of the Olines..its not funny how they messed over 1 of the 3 most prolific passing offenses in the NFL now, if you can just explain to me how a 4th rnd rookie LBer has a higher speed rating than every corner( at least 1 of whom ran 4.3) on the roster, and a receiver known for his speed(also 4.3 guy) how is this possible?? and how/why the heck are people defending this nonsene.??? and understand, this is just my team ive looked at .. its probably messed up across the board

Not sure if anybody mentioned this but they did say before that speed is all relative. Pat white at 87 speed i believe it was is going to be slower than a corner who has 87 speed. It's done differently by positions, from what i understand. Some confirmation from Ian would be nice but i swear i've heard them say this. And it would make sense because for example:
Vince young 85 speed, 4.58 40 yard dash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn_Fu...eature=related

Jared Cook 85 speed 4.5 40 yard dash
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saxhQG9Smhk

Nick "Why did you cut back" Harper 80 speed 4.58 dash time
LOL damn nick harper doesn't really have any highlights but i'm sure you all remember him in the colts steelers playoff game.

# 64 tooldude79 @ 06/14/09 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 18manning18


	Not sure if anybody mentioned this but they did say before that speed is all relative. Pat white at 87 speed i believe it was is going to be slower than a corner who has 87 speed. It's done differently by positions, from what i understand. Some confirmation from Ian would be nice but i swear i've heard them say this. And it would make sense because for example: Vince young 85 speed, 4.58 40 yard dash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn_Fu...eature=related Jared Cook 85 speed 4.5 40 yard dash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saxhQG9Smhk Nick "Why did you cut back" Harper 80 speed 4.58 dash time LOL damn nick harper doesn't really have any highlights but i'm sure you all remember him in the colts steelers playoff game.

if youre correct about them being relative to the position then "thank God." i havent heard this, but hope youre right

# 65 DallasAllDay @ 06/15/09 12:00 AM

I knew comming in to this season that the Cowboys WR's were gonna get no love but geez Patrick Crayton is rated a 73 and Steve Smith of the Giants is Rated a 76.

Steve Smith = 57 reception 574yrd = 10.1 a catch
Patrick Crayton 39 reception 550yrd = 14.1

Not to mention that crayton has put up these kinds of numbers for the past 3 years and this is past year that steve smith has ever done anything.

Ian tell me you will fix this. i dont care if crayton goes up or Smith comes down but this is just wrong.

# 66 cowboyscowboys @ 06/15/09 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DallasAllDay


	I knew comming in to this season that the Cowboys WR's were gonna get no love but geez Patrick Crayton is rated a 73 and Steve Smith of the Giants is Rated a 76. Steve Smith = 57 reception 574yrd = 10.1 a catch Patrick Crayton 39 reception 550yrd = 14.1 Not to mention that crayton has put up these kinds of numbers for the past 3 years and this is past year that steve smith has ever done anything. Ian tell me you will fix this. i dont care if crayton goes up or Smith comes down but this is just wrong.

Crayton is slightly underrated rated but he is a punk and I could care less lol. Don't lower Smith this isn't a competition it's about giving players the ratings they deserve. Smith is a 76 IMO.

For Giants fans I haven't heard anybody say anything about Dominique Hixon I mean he is pretty fast and was pretty solid last year, he is only a 70 I think his rating should be higher.

# 67 DallasAllDay @ 06/15/09 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cowboyscowboys


	Crayton is slightly underrated rated but he is a punk and I could care less lol. Don't lower Smith this isn't a competition it's about giving players the ratings they deserve. Smith is a 76 IMO. For Giants fans I haven't heard anybody say anything about Dominique Hixon I mean he is pretty fast and was pretty solid last year, he is only a 70 I think his rating should be higher.

Thats my point how are they comming up with these rating if not by the preformance throught the season all three of these players should be rated pretty much the same, but yet there is quite a bit of difference between there ratings.

I'm shouldn't the guys that have been in the league and produced consistantly for a few years be rated higher initially then a guy that come out put up similar numbers but for only one year.

# 68 statpacker8351 @ 06/15/09 12:15 AM

fo the cards i wonder why wilrey fontenot(a guy who probably wont make the team) is higher than greg toler(who some call the next DRC) and ralph brown who played great down the stretch.

and Leinarts rating just makes me sick. If he started he would be in the 80s.

I also think jerheme urban and early doucet should be a little higher as well. doucet was hurt all year and looks to have excellent potential.

# 69 TyghtWork @ 06/15/09 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 18manning18


	Not sure if anybody mentioned this but they did say before that speed is all relative. Pat white at 87 speed i believe it was is going to be slower than a corner who has 87 speed. It's done differently by positions, from what i understand. Some confirmation from Ian would be nice but i swear i've heard them say this. And it would make sense because for example: Vince young 85 speed, 4.58 40 yard dash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn_Fu...eature=related Jared Cook 85 speed 4.5 40 yard dash http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saxhQG9Smhk Nick "Why did you cut back" Harper 80 speed 4.58 dash time LOL damn nick harper doesn't really have any highlights but i'm sure you all remember him in the colts steelers playoff game.

If that is so, why is Ricky Williams so slow. Last season he looked faster then ronnie brown.
But, Ronnie is 91, and Ricky is 82 WTF.

# 70 Jono078 @ 06/15/09 12:16 AM

Only a few complaints with the Vikings.

Chester Taylor - For real only a 78? Tahi is equal with him? I thought Taylor would be 80-82, he could start for almost any other team and do a solid job.

Madeau Williams - Lower than Tyrell Johnson, how did they get that? He was quite good once he came back from injury, certainly think he isn't worse than T Johnson.

EJ Henderson - Thought he would be higher, although he was lowly rated in Head Coach also, does Donny Moore just not rate the guy? Id have to think that is the case. Thought he would be around 84.

# 71 marcoyk @ 06/15/09 12:22 AM

I'm predicting that Tom Brady will go from 97 to 99 verrrrry quickly.

# 72 marcoyk @ 06/15/09 12:25 AM

WOAH!!! Ray Lewis is a 97?! That's a little high for me, especially because he's seven points above Terell Suggs!

# 73 cowboyscowboys @ 06/15/09 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marcoyk


	I'm predicting that Tom Brady will go from 97 to 99 verrrrry quickly.

He should still be a 99 but so many cry babies put pressure to lower him, and yes it will be fast for him to be back to 99.

# 74 Matt Diesel @ 06/15/09 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooldude79


	this oline(starters bolded) has given up the least sacks over the past 2 years and their ratings=LOL EA

This is not accurate. Check your sources.

# 75 CKW11 @ 06/15/09 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by statpacker8351


	fo the cards i wonder why wilrey fontenot(a guy who probably wont make the team) is higher than greg toler(who some call the next DRC) and ralph brown who played great down the stretch. and Leinarts rating just makes me sick. If he started he would be in the 80s. I also think jerheme urban and early doucet should be a little higher as well. doucet was hurt all year and looks to have excellent potential.

I completely agree with you especially about Toler, at least they have his speed pretty high, which i was worried they wouldnt get right. The only thing i disagree with you on is Doucet. He didnt play last year and from what i hear isnt looking all that good in OTA's, even though they arent the best indication. I hear Lance Long is actually impressing and outperforming Doucet, mainly due to Doucet being quite inconsistent. So basically i dont have a problem with Doucet's rating.

# 76 tooldude79 @ 06/15/09 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt Diesel


	This is not accurate. Check your sources.

how is it not?...the Saints have given up 29 sacks over the past 2 seasons combined, fewer than any other team

# 77 Outkizast @ 06/15/09 12:38 AM

I'm stoked about these new ratings!! You can actually tell where your team has holes now!! before it was like... ok .. no starters below an 85... My team looks good to go... now it's like.. holy cow... I got a couple 60 something starters... and some low 70s.... It's time to get some better talent !!

# 78 RedZoneD25 @ 06/15/09 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the drewster


	on a positive note the panthers o line looks great. Gross 95 Wharton 83 Kalil 82 Vincent 74 Otah 86

Real good.....Almost as good as my Eagles, whose worst lineman is still higher than your second best.

# 79 SHO @ 06/15/09 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by statpacker8351


	fo the cards i wonder why wilrey fontenot(a guy who probably wont make the team) is higher than greg toler(who some call the next DRC) and ralph brown who played great down the stretch. and Leinarts rating just makes me sick. If he started he would be in the 80s. I also think jerheme urban and early doucet should be a little higher as well. doucet was hurt all year and looks to have excellent potential.

Toler is very raw and Ralph Brown (who I think should be a tad higher) is a scrub despite his good play down the stretch.

Disagree about Urban. He's rated right where he should be. If it was me, I'd probably have him lower.

Leinart is disappointing, but it's better being rated 62 like the initial reports.

# 80 SHO @ 06/15/09 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooldude79


	dude, Meachem only caught long balls last season...get a clue kid

That doesn't mean he has 4.3 game speed. Larry Fitzgerald caught plenty of long balls.

« Previous 1 2 345 6 7 8 Next »

More Links

Madden NFL 10: All Player Ratings Revealed (Pasta Padre)