Madden 2010 News Post

Madden NFL 10: All Player Ratings Revealed (Pasta Padre)

07:05 PM - June 14, 2009 by vannwolfhawk

Pasta Padre has posted all of the Madden NFL 10 ratings, via an Excel spreadsheet.

Quote:


	"I am really looking forward to seeing how the spread out ratings affect the game. It makes the strengths and weaknesses of each team apparent and depth becomes more important. Users will have to strategically consider each team�s personnel. It should really open things up with the games better resembling what would be seen in the NFL."

Game: Madden NFL 10Reader Score: 7.5/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Wii / Xbox 360Votes for game: 76 - View All

Madden NFL 10 Videos

Member Comments

# 41 ItzH3r0 @ 06/14/09 09:42 PM

Some of the ratings are WTF but you have to take in mind THAT THE WHOLE RATING SYSTEM HAS BEEN REVAMP!

# 42 SportsTop @ 06/14/09 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unforgiven


	I don't care that he's a 75. What bothers me is that he's lower than our two rookie corners who haven't played a down in the NFL, and he's the one teaching them everything they need to know about the game..

And how does that translate to Madden? What's Allen's intangibles ratings? Oh wait....we don't know that yet.

# 43 Unforgiven @ 06/14/09 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squint


	And how does that translate to Madden? What's Allen's intangibles ratings? Oh wait....we don't know that yet.

Whatever. I said I wasn't going to bother ranting about it and just change it when I get the game, because I personally do not agree with them. Sorry for having an opinion on sometihng

And its not all about him being too low, its just that I think that's not where he should be. Like I think Porter is just a tad high, because he didn't really accomplish much besides getting sacks, he is not a great all around linebacker, just a great pass rusher

# 44 ImReady77 @ 06/14/09 09:47 PM

The bucs passing game is goin to smell like ****!!!

# 45 #1EaglesFan1973 @ 06/14/09 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooldude79


	LMAO at these ratings: the saints drafted LBer Stanley Arnoux in the 4th round(on IR) and his speed is rated higher than every single corner on the Saints...makes sense, right?..umm no.. oh and did you know he's also faster than WR Robert Meachem who ran a 4.3??...c'mon EA, we are not ********!!!! get it right!! you can spread the ratings however you want, but please dont make them a complete joke

Its not all about 40 times genius. You have to factor in "Game Speed' as well & meachem doens't play like he runs a 4.3 at all.

# 46 tyler741 @ 06/14/09 09:55 PM

Why is Shonn Greene's speed only an 82?
He's faster than Jehu Caulcrick, who has the same speed...
I think he should be an 84-86, he is big- but by no means slow

# 47 tooldude79 @ 06/14/09 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mKoz26


	Saints fans: There are two types of blocking. Run blocking, and pass blocking. Your linemen excel at pass blocking, and not so much at run blocking. Therefore, their overall rating is a balance between the two, and for the Saints line that means only good overall ratings, rather than great ones. Did the breakdown help?

hey, explain to me how the Pats(a team who doesnt run well either) have much higher ratings for their Oline, yet theyve given up more sacks than the Saints...
think about what youre saying then post,please!

# 48 treee @ 06/14/09 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tyler741


	Why is Shonn Greene's speed only an 82? He's faster than Jehu Caulcrick, who has the same speed... I think he should be an 84-86, he is big- but by no means slow

82 Isn't gonna be slow in this years game.

# 49 tooldude79 @ 06/14/09 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #1EaglesFan1973


	Its not all about 40 times genius. You have to factor in "Game Speed' as well & meachem doens't play like he runs a 4.3 at all.

dude, Meachem only caught long balls last season...get a clue kid

# 50 SportsTop @ 06/14/09 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooldude79


	hey genius, explain to me how the Pats(a team who doesnt run well either) have much higher ratings for their Oine, yet theyve given up more sacks than the Saints... think about what youre saying then post,please!

Two things:

1. The Patriots gameplan not to use the run not because they can't, but because they like to use the short passing game instead. When they do choose to concentrate on the run, they do it well.

2. They gave up more sacks because it was Matt Cassell who held onto the ball too long and not because of their offensive line.

Think before you post.

# 51 hiuhyoi @ 06/14/09 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefsfan881129


	But The Ones I Listed Have Played Like Colquitt Who Gets RAPED BY EA Cuz They Got A Dude That Bases His Ratings Off Of A Fake System Instead Of Looklng At How Good A Guy Is And What He Has Done In This League A Rookie Yes I Can Understand Your Point And I Agree With It But A Guy Who Has Been In The League For 4 YEARS And Is One Of The Best At His Position And Gets RAPED By EA I Defentally Have A Right To Complain Again I Never Useally Complain But I Have A Reason To Complain Now But Good Points Though Anyway Good Night!

Hah Colquitt is NOT a top 5 punter.

# 52 hiuhyoi @ 06/14/09 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooldude79


	hey, explain to me how the Pats(a team who doesnt run well either) have much higher ratings for their Oline, yet theyve given up more sacks than the Saints... think about what youre saying then post,please!

Sacks allowed is a very misleading way to gauge how good your linemen are blocking. Most players can't control sacks so you have to factor in QB Hits and QB Pressures, believe me Jammal Brown is lucky to still have his 90 after last season.

I do agree that Jahri Evans got shafted though, Carl Nicks as well maybe.

# 53 tooldude79 @ 06/14/09 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squint


	Two things: 1. The Patriots gameplan not to use the run not because they can't, but because they like to use the short passing game instead. When they do choose to concentrate on the run, they do it well. 2. They gave up more sacks because it was Matt Cassell who held onto the ball too long and not because of their offensive line. Think before you post.

1. same as the Saints, Reggie only catches 70 balls a yr on avg out of the backfield and Brees only led the NFL in yards...the Saints use the short yardage passing game instead of the run game just like the Pats

2.They gave up fewer sacks than the Pats in 07 as well, you know the year Brady threw 50 tds.

think before you post

# 54 SportsTop @ 06/14/09 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooldude79


	1. same as the Saints, Reggie only catches 70 balls a yr on avg out of the backfield and Brees only led the NFL in yards...the Saints use the short yardage passing game instead of the run game just like the Pats 2.They gave up fewer sacks than the Pats in 07 as well, you know the year Brady threw 50 tds. think before *you* post

You're missing the fundamental point of the post. As stated above, sacks aren't completely on the O-line. A lot of it is on the QB, schemes, and/or other players.

The Patriots went from 21 sacks allowed in '07 to 48 in '08. Do you honestly think that is all the o-line?

# 55 tyler741 @ 06/14/09 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by treee


	82 Isn't gonna be slow in this years game.

Alright, I'll take your word for it.. I'm more of an NCAA-er. I hope it's faster than it sounds

# 56 tooldude79 @ 06/14/09 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squint


	You're missing the fundamental point of the post. As stated above, sacks aren't completely on the O-line. A lot of it is on the QB, schemes, and/or other players. The Patriots went from 21 sacks allowed in '07 to 48 in '08. Do you honestly think that is all the o-line?

neither of us realized the Pats did as well in their RBBC last year after Brady went down

anyway,my point is in 2007 when Brees and Brady were both healthy the Pats still gave up 75% more sacks than the Saints...of course, sacks arent the only way to jude an oline..but when you throw the ball almost every play(as the Pats in 07 and the Saints in 07,08) and only get sacked 13-16 times, it should count for something...should it not?

# 57 SportsTop @ 06/14/09 10:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooldude79


	neither of us realized the Pats did as well in their RBBC last year after Brady went down anyway,my point is in 2007 when Brees and Brady were both healthy the Pats still gave up 75% more sacks than the Saints...of course, sacks arent the only way to jude an oline..but when you throw the ball almost every play(as the Pats in 07 and the Saints in 07,08) and only get sacked 13-16 times, it should count for something...should it not?

Sacks Allowed 2007:

Patriots: 21
Saints: 16

That is not 75% more....it's actually right around 24%.

# 58 tooldude79 @ 06/14/09 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Squint


	Sacks Allowed 2007: Patriots: 21 Saints: 16 That is not 75% more....it's actually right around 24%.

i mustve mixed 07(16) and 08(13)..either way..compare the ratings of the Olines..its not funny how they messed over 1 of the 3 most prolific passing offenses in the NFL

now, if you can just explain to me how a 4th rnd rookie LBer has a higher speed rating than every corner( at least 1 of whom ran 4.3) on the roster, and a receiver known for his speed(also 4.3 guy)
how is this possible?? and how/why the heck are people defending this nonsene.???
and understand, this is just my team ive looked at .. its probably messed up across the board

# 59 Zuke @ 06/14/09 10:55 PM

I was wondering what you guys think of rookie late round picks coming in higher rated than players that have been in the league for some time, example: C Painter 62 R Bomar 62 is better than Carr 60 Sorgi 47 Troy Simth 59 Brennan 49 and guys like Brunell 62 & Harrington 63 who have not played for a year are better than some of the guys I have mentioned.

I know it is only a few points but NFL experience has to count for something. Troy was going to probably be the starter but fell ill and there is a 22 point diff from him and the starter Flacco

As long as progression is fixed I guess we dont have anything to worry about

# 60 Skyboxer @ 06/14/09 11:00 PM

With the revamped ratings system and having players more spread out, I think it will be great. I'm just taking it for what it is.
.
I'm thinking it's going to allow for true subbing for specific situations. If they are in fact spread out ,each player regardless of overall will have their own areas of strengths.
So possibly instead of always just making sure your hightest rated overall player is in the game, you'll have to dig a little deeper.
So there may be times you actually have a player rated a little lower overall that simply fits the situation (or team philosophy) better..

That's how how looking at it anyways.. Hope I'm right.

« Previous 1 234 5 6 7 8 Next »

More Links

Madden NFL 10: All Player Ratings Revealed (Pasta Padre)