Home
NCAA Football 10 News Post



Check out the new NCAA Football 10 video, which features a bunch of new gameplay animations.

Game: NCAA Football 10Reader Score: 6.5/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Wii / Xbox 360Votes for game: 61 - View All
NCAA Football 10 Videos
Member Comments
# 121 jyoung @ 06/12/09 03:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTodd84
And also, All-Pro 2K8 had over two years to develop, OF COURSE it would have better animations and engine than the EA games that year bc EA already had an engine in place and were trying to work with that on a yearly cycle. And there won't be another All-Pro until NEXT YEAR, which means they will have had THREE YEARS to work on the next one. Big advantage in making a great game.
Actually, All Pro Football 2K8 only had six months of development time.

The engine was put "on ice" after they lost the NFL rights and didn't get "thawed out" again until January 2007.

The game then shipped in mid-July of that same year.
 
# 122 TheTodd84 @ 06/12/09 03:47 PM
So it's not that EA doesn't care, it's that on a lot of these issues, they have to set their priorities if a game is developed yearly. It takes more than a year to implement a brand new Physics engine, so for those sideline catches, that is how it will have to be, sorry. I mean, I know that those don't bother me because I want my game to PLAY realistically, not every single animation has to be completely true to life because then it would take the fun out of it for most of us. I know that my roommates and I STILL play NCAA 09 bc it's fun, not because the animations are great.

While, yes, the pass rush sucked last year, but they did their best to try and fix it. To be honest, I'd rather have a pocket to play with than get sacked every single time. So I applaud their efforts to try and create that. And the animations have to be calculated at random, so it's hard to set a realistic limit on things such as QB evasion if it is based entirely on ratings.

While I know it's unrealistic, I enjoy playing as Idaho or New Mexico State and have a fighters chance to at least score or be reasonably productive vs. USC or Alabama, when in real life, I wouldn't have a fighters chance against those schools. That is what makes video games fun, and if it wasn't like that, NO ONE would even play as those teams ever bc no one likes getting their tail handed to them EVERY TIME.

Again, just my two cents. I think NCAA '10 will just be ok. I think it will, gameplay wise be an improvement over NCAA 09, but it will not be great. And to be honest, that's ok.

What is not ok? The roster blunder. That is just inexcusable. But... that's for another thread and forum.
 
# 123 TheTodd84 @ 06/12/09 03:53 PM
wEEman, you might be right, but you said they put the engine "on-ice" when they heard about the exclusivity thing. Well that would mean that they had already developed the engine when the exclusivity thing hit which was in 2005 and the game didn't release until 2007.

So those "six months" of development time were just used to upgrade the NFL 2K5 engine, which is fine. But, for All-Pro 2K11, they will have had over two years to develop it. IF they only used 6 months of that, fine. But fans of APF 2k8 have a right to expect an incredible game next year.

I just think people are spoiled by the last-gen games and I understand their gripes with the new technology and the lack of physics. But, it takes time to develop and as it is now, only minute things will be added each year, just like on last-gen. So, all we can hope for is increased physics and momentum in NCAA 11.

And remember, it's not that we didn't have these same gripes on the last-gen, we just couldn't voice them because we didn't have these websites. I can guarantee there were the same gripes on last-gen for awhile, we just couldn't hear them.
 
# 124 Hassan Darkside @ 06/12/09 04:44 PM
I won't lie, the vid is nice. It has a lot of nice animations in it. BUT, I think that these videos are completely unnecessary. I always feel that this type of stuff is better left for the user to see in the game. Take NBA 2k9/APF 2k8 for instance. They had the videos, the trailers, etc. But those never showed everything the game had to offer. That was why we were still able to have threads like "The little things..." where we could discuss the subtletees that make the game authentic. It's these types of things that keep us coming back.

But on top of it all, sometimes piling more and more animations in a game doesn't make it better. Case and point, NBA 2k9. Practically the same game as NBA 2k8 or NBA 2k7. Same engine as last gen. It has some significant issues but it's loaded up with (beautiful) animations to try to cover them up. Animations are like make-up. They're often used to hide the real b*tch underneath.

I just hope the game plays well. I can live with a roster issue. I can live with my player having the incorrect skin color. All that can be fixed. I can't live with every interception being a pick six, I can't live with the inability to be tackled or make tackles and I can't live with cheating AI. If all that's fixed and it's a carbon copy of 09 with good AI and adequate animations, then that's fine and dandy. They just better bring they're A game next year. That is all.
 
# 125 hawkeyekid @ 06/12/09 04:59 PM
Good things: The bad throws when you get pressure on the QB, some of the WR/DB interactions, right stick DL moves

Bad things: Sideline catches (can't there be a happy middle ground), WRs slipping, yet getting up in .1 seconds and making a catch

Adam, you know I'm going to ask this too.

How did Iowa's face masks get through as white? After last year's yellow numbers fiasco, I thought the community did a pretty good job of giving you some pics of Iowa's jerseys.
 
# 126 Rivals @ 06/12/09 05:21 PM
This may sound odd, but the best new animations I saw were the non catches and throws out of sacks. Not glamorous, but realistic. Sideline catches... those plays would have most likely taken the receiver out of bounds. The running animations should really be slowed down to detail the weight shift of players better. To make those cuts, a player would have to extend the outside leg and make a huge plant. Even then, the first two scenes had receivers moving too fast to the sideline to actually make a cut up field.
 
# 127 Hey_Rebby @ 06/12/09 06:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTodd84
Someone brought this up awhile ago, but it needs to happen. Stop developing sports games on an annual basis. We no longer need it in 2009 or going forward. We have brand new technology that is getting more and more complicated to develop for, so if you have to build a sports game from the ground up, as EA did in 2006 or 7, it is IMPOSSIBLE to make a game without serious flaws in just one year.

It is time where sports developers take two years to develop a game. DLC is available at the drop of a hat. Instead of rushing to develop NCAA '11, why doesn't EA devote 95% of their time to NCAA '12 and addressing most of the concerns and then give us animation tweaks, roster and uniform updates via DLC. And for those out there who do not have a fast internet connection or play online at all, then maybe EA could just make a disc with just the new content on, send it out to game stores and the kids could pick it up there for the same price.

I think the age of developing sports games on a yearly cycle is more of a headache than it needs to be. Because of the increasing technology, games take a lot longer to develop. I don't think that the idea of releasing uniform/animation/roster updates every down year is an unrealistic proposition. It could be done and it would work. I guarantee there are hundreds upon thousands, if not millions of people out there who will pay upwards of $10 a pop for accurate updated rosters, $7-10 for uniform and equipment updates of EVERY player, $7-12 for animation or gameplay updates on the off-year. Of course, this is purely speculation, but game companies could do market research and find out for themselves.

I think that until this is the precedent for sports games, there will be these headaches and false promises EVERY SINGLE YEAR. It is just a shame that licensing contracts with the leagues may be preventing this and may be requiring a game to come out every year. I don't know, I'm not a lawyer.

But until this happens, we will continue to hear the same garbage every year. And also, All-Pro 2K8 had over two years to develop, OF COURSE it would have better animations and engine than the EA games that year bc EA already had an engine in place and were trying to work with that on a yearly cycle. And there won't be another All-Pro until NEXT YEAR, which means they will have had THREE YEARS to work on the next one. Big advantage in making a great game.

Just my two cents. Carry on.
People need to stop buying the game every year if this was ever going to happen. Companies don't just turn their back on $$$ to make a better product.
 
# 128 Rocky @ 06/12/09 06:08 PM
I liked some things in the trailer. But I'm not going to highlight those things, because apparently NCAA developers still don't get it.

The vid at about :30 seconds is the worst thing I have seen in a football video game.......EVER.

ever Rocky?

Yes. Ever

Really, Rocky ever?

Yes, ever...really.

Rocky, you have played 7 seasons in your franchise for NFL Primetime 2002 made by Konami...and that's the worst thing you've ever seen in the football game?

Yes, it's the worst thing I have ever seen in a football game (relatively speaking of course). Not only did all lineman fall down in a trailer but it happened in two different clips. That was astounding....truly one of the most comically depressing things I have ever seen in my once beloved NCAA Football.
 
# 129 GetYaWeigtUp @ 06/12/09 07:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam_Thompson_EA
Yep. That is why we are here. Actually there are a LOT of the devs lurking on the forums (Hi guys!). Only some of us are cleared to post.

Yes we like feedback. It is very important to us. But I have to admit that the negativity and the trolling recently is wearing on me. It makes it a lot harder to come to this site and look for feedback when you have to sort through the unconstructive stuff.
I'll be the first to admit, I've been flaming you guys over the last few weeks countlessly and I have problem doing it again! Im sure if you go to Red Lobster and order a $60 meal for your family and the food tastes like crap, your gonna raise hell to the waitor, manager or the chef. You'd be pissed and ask for some kind of compensation.

Well this isnt much different, except their is no compensation for us when you guys decide to give us a game that has absolutely NO DEFENSE, or BROKEN SLIDERS, or NO PASS RUSH, or broken pieces in online dynasty. We arent compensated, we're fed excuses and then when next years game is showcased, we see nothing has changed to improve most of the major concern areas.

I think you forget who we are and what we do. We are PAYING CONSUMERS, we pay your salary, because to be quite honest...if we all boycotted this game for a year, someone would be out of a job! Its nothing personal, we just want our food nice and hot when we get it on July 14th. Dont take it home with you, its work! We all got jobs where people give us hell about our product or service but we all deal with it like you should! So if you cant take the heat, stay out the kitchen!
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.