More Links

oneamongthefence · 04-01-2011, 01:24 AM

Here's to eventually getting **** line play in ******. Just wanted to use **** and ****** in the same sentence. Just add more outcomes and remake their win loss formulas seems like the easiest ***.

nighttrain32 · 04-01-2011, 01:45 AM

It may never be "realistic" but EA could at least try to make the line play better. If ends rushed the edge more and d tackles collapsed the middle, we would all care less about how much time it takes to release the ball. APF 2k8 does it better than ****** and NCAA because of the rarity of suction blocking. ****** and NCAA give the illusion of a speed rush by making linemen not attempt to reach or anything and just let the defender run by.

Good article by the way.

PSRusse83 · 04-01-2011, 01:59 AM

******? The only problem i see with the Line play is User Defensive vs Computer O Line.

PSRusse83 · 04-01-2011, 02:00 AM

Seriously OS ****** is an unacceptable word? When did this become a communist web site?

bcruise · 04-01-2011, 02:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSRusse83


	Seriously OS ***** is an unacceptable word? When did this become a communist web site?*

I would advise you to check the calendar before going off on a rant that may get you in trouble...

DavidOrtizFootball · 04-01-2011, 02:35 AM

The ProTak tech that M10 implemented was a half -finished product of something that we had been building toward for 3 years. You gotta realize that we were so rushed in the early years, we HAD to go arcade. They didn't give us any time for authenticity.

ryan36 · 04-01-2011, 02:36 AM

Wow man I keep deleting posts, but if you're gonna come on here...you're gonna have to prove it

swaldo · 04-01-2011, 07:04 AM

The way Backbreaker was set up it took something like 4 seconds to read the field. People weren't really complaining about the speed, instead it was more about the imbalance. An NFL QB can read the field in 2.5 seconds but you can't do that in BB. You really need the pass rush to average 4.5 seconds in that game to have a chance. Hopefully the next version will have a better system to scan the defense so they can make the DL rush more realistic.

04-01-2011, 01:24 AM	#65
oneamongthefence Nothing to see here folks OVR: 22 Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Mississippi Posts: 5,692 Blog Entries: 6	Re: Why Line Play Will Never Be Realistic in Football Games Here's to eventually getting ** line play in **. Just wanted to use and ** in the same sentence. Just add more outcomes and remake their win loss formulas seems like the easiest *.

04-01-2011, 02:35 AM	#70
DavidOrtizFootball Banned OVR: 0 Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 7	Re: Why Line Play Will Never Be Realistic in Football Games The ProTak tech that M10 implemented was a half -finished product of something that we had been building toward for 3 years. You gotta realize that we were so rushed in the early years, we HAD to go arcade. They didn't give us any time for authenticity.

04-01-2011, 02:36 AM	#71
ryan36 7 dirty words... OVR: 36 Join Date: Feb 2003 Posts: 10,182 Blog Entries: 8	Re: Why Line Play Will Never Be Realistic in Football Games Wow man I keep deleting posts, but if you're gonna come on here...you're gonna have to prove it

	Operation Sports Survey - Newsletter, Forums, Content and More
	From Guaranteed to Never Happening, a College Football 26 Wishlist
	2025 Sports Video Game Predictions

04-01-2011, 01:45 AM	#66
nighttrain32 Rookie OVR: 5 Join Date: May 2009	It may never be "realistic" but EA could at least try to make the line play better. If ends rushed the edge more and d tackles collapsed the middle, we would all care less about how much time it takes to release the ball. APF 2k8 does it better than **** and NCAA because of the rarity of suction blocking. **** and NCAA give the illusion of a speed rush by making linemen not attempt to reach or anything and just let the defender run by. Good article by the way.

04-01-2011, 01:59 AM	#67
PSRusse83 Rookie OVR: 4 Join Date: Mar 2011	******? The only problem i see with the Line play is User Defensive vs Computer O Line.

04-01-2011, 02:00 AM	#68
PSRusse83 Rookie OVR: 4 Join Date: Mar 2011	Seriously OS ****** is an unacceptable word? When did this become a communist web site?

04-01-2011, 07:04 AM	#72
swaldo MVP OVR: 20 Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 1,268 Blog Entries: 1	The way Backbreaker was set up it took something like 4 seconds to read the field. People weren't really complaining about the speed, instead it was more about the imbalance. An NFL QB can read the field in 2.5 seconds but you can't do that in BB. You really need the pass rush to average 4.5 seconds in that game to have a chance. Hopefully the next version will have a better system to scan the defense so they can make the DL rush more realistic.

More Links

Why Line Play Will Never Be Realistic in Football Games