NBA 2K13 Player Ratings - Kobe - 93, Melo - 92, Rondo - 90

[Colts18]

Quote: Originally Posted by DukeC

He had a 38 dunk rating. That means he was physically unable to dunk in 2K. 2K boosted it to a 60 or so. Personally, I would have been happy if it was at least 40-41, because that's where the threshold of being able to dunk is in 2k12.

I am saying his dunk rating should have been placed at the min that allows him to dunk. Which is a 45.

[Colts18]

Quote: Originally Posted by chandlerbang

thats how the nba determines league leaders in each category but on court performance. current On court production is the only thing that should matter with rating adjustments NOT what a player did in 2009 smh

What exactly does League Leaders have to do with attribute assignments? Attributes are qualities. Skills. Grades for ability. League Leaders is simply a yearly ranking of said abilities. Really a horrible reference point.

Again I ask, if a career 42% 3PT shooter has 1 bad year and shoots 33%, should he be rated the same as someone who is a career 33% 3PT shooter who also happens to be shooting 33%? I think not. That really makes no sense.

[youvalss]

Question to you attribute-heads: what's the point of 1-44 dunking if a guy can't dunk at all under 45? Wouldn't it make more sense that 0=no dunks at all, 1=lowest dunking ability (but still able to dunk)? I mean, what does 1-44 do? Does it have anything to do with layups?

[ojandpizza]

I don't think you have to be a 45 to dunk.. Seems like I've dunked with much lower before because the vertical rating was sky high.. I might be wrong though

[2_headedmonster]

Quote: Originally Posted by Colts18

What exactly does League Leaders have to do with attribute assignments? Attributes are qualities. Skills. Grades for ability. League Leaders is simply a yearly ranking of said abilities. Really a horrible reference point. Again I ask, if a career 42% 3PT shooter has 1 bad year and shoots 33%, should he be rated the same as someone who is a career 33% 3PT shooter who also happens to be shooting 33%? I think not. That really makes no sense.

If attempts between the two are The same....yes. A player should not be gifted a rating. if they were simply in a slump, they will improve and so will their rating.

[youALREADYknow]

Quote: Originally Posted by 2_headedmonster

If attempts between the two are The same....yes. A player should not be gifted a rating. if they were simply in a slump, they will improve and so will their rating.

By your logic, Amare Stoudemire deserves Mid and Close ratings in the 60's in 2K12 (as of today) despite shooting well over 40% from those ranges in every single other season of his career.

I'll leave it at that...

[Colts18]

Quote: Originally Posted by ojandpizza

I don't think you have to be a 45 to dunk.. Seems like I've dunked with much lower before because the vertical rating was sky high.. I might be wrong though

Yea you are wrong. Vertical doesn't matter. 45 is the min.

[JwP23]

Quote: Originally Posted by youvalss

Question to you attribute-heads: what's the point of 1-44 dunking if a guy can't dunk at all under 45? Wouldn't it make more sense that 0=no dunks at all, 1=lowest dunking ability (but still able to dunk)? I mean, what does 1-44 do? Does it have anything to do with layups?

Yeah, this is what I was wondering as well. It seems like 1 through 44 are meaningless. 2K should solve this issue.