NBA 2K12 Player Ratings Revealed, Including All Free Agents

[Notorious Arab]

Do people really think Kobe deserves a 78 in mid range besides Laker fans?

[RedSceptile]

Quote: Originally Posted by Notorious Arab

Do people really think Kobe deserves a 78 in mid range besides Laker fans?

http://lakersblog.latimes.com/lakers...be-bryant.html

Just a general answer to similar questions.

[Jukeman]

Rondo > Westbrook

That is all...




Sent from my HumancentiPad using Tapatalk

[Paul Pierce_OS]

Quote: Originally Posted by The Champ of Champs

NBA 2k12 where drew gooden can shoot better than Kobe -_- Y would they change the ratings from 2k11?? NBA 2k11 represents the last imprint the players had on us, y would 2k give people a off season boots?? Lebron went from 96 to 98 y?? y?? the man choked in the finals -_-

this

[GSWarriors9]

Why is Charlie Bell so good in 2k. This guy is complete garbage in real lifeyet he is rated a 64? He should be in the 50's

[_-King-_]

Quote: Originally Posted by jeebs9

This one thing I don't understand what people are throwing around. Lebron not clutch.. Sure he came up short in the Finals. But god... That boy was lights out during the whole playoffs.

Low 70s? If it's above 30 it's a disgrace.

[SdotThaDon]

Question, so why does Kobe deserve a better midrange rating after shooting below par an entire season from midrange....But when it comes to Lebron he's supposed to suck after one bad playoff series?
(82 game stretch vs. 6 game stretch)

[DurtySoufReppin]

Quote: Originally Posted by Notorious Arab

Do people really think Kobe deserves a 78 in mid range besides Laker fans?

I know I don't, and I hate that people use %'s to justify the rating.

There are so many things that go into a mid range rating besides %'s.

Take for example Serge Ibaka (77 mid range) and Zach Randolph (69 mid range).

Who in there right minds would think Serge Ibaka is a better mid range shooter than Zach Randolph??


Serge Ibaka is a spot up shooter. Most of his shots are wide open, he isn't forced to take bad shots due to shot clocks and being the primary scorer of his team like Randolph.


This increases his chances of having a higher % than Randolph, that doesn't mean he's a better mid range shooter.

A spot up shooter should be a spot up shooter, don't boost his ratings just because he gets more open looks than a player who's getting double teamed and always has the team's best defender on him .


J.R. Smith has a 91 mid range and Kobe has a 78. That is a HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE difference.

J.R. Smith isn't forced to put the team on his back at times, and isn't the only perimeter threat on his team like Kobe.

These are things that you have to take in consideration when you're making the ratings, not just %'s.

If you asked a coach,NBA Player, or NBA Expert who's a better mid range shooter, J.R. Smith or Kobe?? Who do you think they're going to say?????

These ratings are terrible, point blank period.

Don't just make ratings off %'s, get a guy to do the ratings that ACTUALLY WATCHES BASKETBALL AND UNDERSTANDS THE WAY 2K Plays.