Madden NFL 13 Hands-On Impressions From Community Event #3 (DLG)

[CRMosier_LM]

Quote: Originally Posted by bigsmallwood

I disagree strongly. There have been many people here at OS that have presented their ideas in a clear & concise manner...problem is a lot

That's why they invite their harshest critics right?!?! That alone nerfs your statement. Smh



Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2

[raguel]

Quote: Originally Posted by AzureEffect

I have not participated in the discussions here on the "route based" passing but there is much more comfort in throwing the ball with the new pass trajectories and "throwing WRs open". I felt comfortable throwing to different routes and throwing to a space where only the WR could catch it. If you are using APF2K8 as a reference; dont do it. This is Madden and it plays more like Madden but the passing game is a lot better and is as open as its ever been.

The first paragraph I get but the second one is IMO a bit vague (or maybe I'm just obtuse ), and if you're allowed I humbly request that you expound a bit, because in the first playbook the devs specifically said that they were adding more qb drop backs. I assumed that meant that wr routes and qb drop backs were better timed together. If that's untrue (or less true than someone who's played other games may wish for) then I'd like a better understanding of what's going on.

[Jaaa]

Quote: Originally Posted by RynoAid

Which is why they brought down The Sim Standard guys right? because they are "safe" Madden opinions...?

Ummm, they're obviously safe enough (or have gotten safe enough) for ea (especially with the pr return they come with), or else they wouldn't be there. Duh.

[Jaaa]

Quote: Originally Posted by stiffarmleft

Which passing game do you refer to?

I am also curious of this question. Did he mean madden passing is better than or better than it used to be?

[bigsmallwood]

Quote: Originally Posted by RynoAid

Which is why they brought down The Sim Standard guys right? because they are "safe" Madden opinions...?

Right.....

[RynoAid]

Quote: Originally Posted by Jaaa

Ummm, they're obviously safe enough (or have gotten safe enough) for ea (especially with the pr return they come with), or else they wouldn't be there. Duh.

Nothing i say will ever get you off your position then, so I'm done discussing it with you.

[roadman]

Quote: Originally Posted by bigsmallwood

I disagree strongly. There have been many people here at OS that have presented their ideas in a clear & concise manner...problem is a lot of people who are chosen for CD days are people who have "safe" opinions about Madden and who are not going to point out facts. Let's be real for a minute, they know exactly who they are inviting the the community days and who they make EA Game Changers etc.....take that statement for what it is.

Why would you say something like this when OS was represented in the past, still has Rgiles, Redzone, TSS goes and on numerous occasions RynoAid, Casey and Shaun Mason have consistently stated in these forums they constructively criticize the developers when they are down there.

We really don't know how we are represented until we go down ourselves, but I don't think anyone here is lying, either.

[bigsmallwood]

Quote: Originally Posted by CRMosier_LM

That's why they invite their harshest critics right?!?! That alone nerfs your statement. Smh Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2

I'm no rookie and I know the PR game...EA knows who to invite. Every year people come back amazed by the "new" Madden only for August to "nerf" your statement. Truth is truth. And there is no way to dispute the facts. I'm waiting for June 4th like everybody else and after that, I hope your words are still strong.