Home
Feature Article
Who Is To Blame for Sports Gamers Being so Picky?

Sports gamers are a difficult bunch to get along with -- I would know since I'm part of that bunch. We used to be happy with decent on-field action and a patched-together season mode.

Oh how things have changed.

Now it's almost fitting to compare modern sports gamers to fans of role-playing games. Ardent RPG fans demand nothing less than perfection. Woe is the developer that does not live up to the latest Final Fantasy. Woe is the developer who does not understand the subtle differences between a wood elf and a high elf. You get the idea.

Scoff if you will, but the fact of the matter is that aficionados of sports games are not much better. In fact, I would argue that we have become worse. We demand that our games be authentic, replayable, and somewhere further down this list, enjoyable. Sports games have turned us into monsters, highly educated and discerning monsters.

Sp let us take a look at what the modern sports game must include, as well as some of the culprits that have raised our expectations to these heights.

 


We can blame NHLPA '93 for our addiction to good gameplay.

Gameplay

Our insistence that sports games be smooth and highly enjoyable experiences quite possibly originated with NHLPA Hockey '93 for the Sega Genesis. Those of you who are old enough to remember when this game came out are probably smiling from ear to ear right now as you recall the many hours you spent playing this game. It is almost difficult to believe that Electronic Arts released this title 17 years ago.


NHLPA Hockey sent a shockwave through the sports-gaming world. It included monstrous body checks, slick stick handling and pinpoint passing. The game also moved at a frenetic pace. Quite simply, there had never been a sports game like it. Hell, there had never been a game like it, period.

NHLPA Hockey achieved the impossible. It converted nearly everybody who played it into a hockey fan. (I had been a hockey fan my entire life, but I found myself turning off the actual games to play virtual hockey on my Sega Genesis -- then again, I am a Toronto Maple Leafs fan so turning their games off is normally preferable to watching them.)

NHLPA Hockey became a cultural phenomenon. It even made a memorable appearance in the movie Swingers -- Vince Vaughn makes reference to Jeremy Roenick’s otherworldly overall game while chiding Wayne Gretzky.

There are few contemporary games that can match the impact of NHLPA Hockey.

Other notables: MVP Baseball, the Madden series, the 2K Basketball series

 


As far as authenticity goes, does anything beat MLB: The Show?

Authenticity

EA’s NHLPA Hockey could provide a number of thrills, but it was by no means authentic. But moving beyond NHLPA Hockey, it is hard to give the authenticity category to one single game. There have been so many great videogames that have bridged the gap between fun and authenticity. Still, I keep coming back to Sony's MLB: The Show as the winner. More than any other game, it has raised the bar in this category.

The Road to the Show (RttS) feature is what puts this title over the top. Let’s face it, in baseball videogames of yore we would simply hammer balls into the cheap seats during every at-bat with our sluggers. Games would be double-digit affairs that would be quickly erased from our memories after they were completed.

In The Show, double-digit runs occur, well, about as often as the do in real life. I don’t know about you, but I struggle to hit .300 during my RttS. I live and die with every at-bat, knowing that as long as I can scratch out a one for four at the plate, my average will not dip too far. The biggest compliment I can give this game is that as soon as I begin to feel that I have everything figured out, I take a drubbing at the hands of the savvy artificial intelligence (AI). Losing has never felt so good.

Other notables: MVP Baseball, NHL '09, text-based games in general

Dynasty Mode

Dynasty mode? Are you kidding me? Back in the day if we got a season mode it was like Christmas came early. There are some incredible experiences to be had if one has the time to commit to a dynasty mode. And every sports game that takes itself seriously must include a meaty dynasty feature.

Still, there is one game that does this mode better than any other. Let’s go across the pond and discuss the Football Manager series (known as Worldwide Soccer Manager in North America). I would hate to know how much time I put into this game. Well, in actuality I do know as the '09 version displays the number on the main page of the game. Embarrassment prohibits me from giving you the exact number, but the accompanying line of text reads: "remember, eating gives you strength to keep on playing."

Yeah.

Quite simply, this is the most addictive dynasty mode out there. Soccer is probably my fifth favorite sport, but it does not matter. You will buy and sell players, develop your youth club, tinker with formations and personnel, develop rivalries with other managers and so much more. The game does a remarkable job of throwing you curveballs to keep you on your toes. It is a cerebral experience that elevates gaming to an art form. It is responsible for raising my dynasty standards more than any other game.

Other notables: Out of the Park Baseball, Front Office Football, MLB: The Show

Statistics

Out of the Park Baseball (OOTP) is the clear winner in this category. Frankly no other game is even close. One can get completely lost in the myriad numbers that this game compiles. I have been playing OOTP since the very first incarnation, and I am still utterly captivated by it.

Baseball is a sport that lends itself to statistics. OOTP gives us all the numbers we can handle and more. It is a remarkable achievement on every level.

Other notables: Every other title is still "in the park."

 


Gamers love a good challenge, and UEFA Euro 2008 offered that in spades.

Challenge

Challenge is a difficult feature to get just right. Too much challenge leads to frustration and too little leads to apathy. Few games seem to be able to find that perfect balance. For my money EA's FIFA series best accomplishes this middle ground. In fact I would argue that EA’s UEFA Euro 2008 is the pinnacle of challenge. This was a title that bridged FIFA '08 and FIFA '09 by virtually representing the European Cup of Soccer.

In UEFA Euro 2008 it is possible to beat a soccer power with a lesser nation, but you had best be on your game to do so. Furthermore, you will have to wisely employ the many formations and mentalities at your disposal. Employ an "all out attack" mentality against Spain if you wish, but don’t expect to gain any Trophies or Achievements because you are going to lose.

Even playing with a powerhouse team is not always easy, as opposing teams will often flood their own end with players as they strive for a 0-0 draw. It can be maddening but in the best possible way. When you finally do score, it is cause for celebration -- one begins to understand why real-life soccer players celebrate their goals so flamboyantly.

Other notables: Pro Evolution Soccer, College Hoops 2K8, Madden

 


As far as fun, Fight Night is the epitome of a game which is just that.

Fun

An unfortunate byproduct of our demands for authenticity is that fun sometimes takes a backseat to realism. This is a shame as videogames should be, first and foremost, fun. EA's NHL series would be a definite contender here, but let us try to avoid repeat winners.

I am going to go with a dark horse in this category. For me the most fun to be had in a videogame can be found in the Fight Night series. The career mode is not great, the boxing can be a little bit artificial, but man, no game has kept me up until the wee hours of the morning like this title. And this has been true since the moment I fired up the first incarnation of the game on my Xbox.

And with each new release I fall in love with the series all over again. There is something extremely enjoyable about beating your opponent to a pulp while wondering how he keeps getting up off the mat. I think part of the appeal is that the matches are relatively short -- this is in stark contrast to the football, basketball and baseball games that are available. The bouts end quickly, and then you want to jump right into the next one. It is the ideal formula. The fact that you can try different styles in different weight classes is also simply awesome.

Fight Night has found the perfect formula for fun.

Other notables: Tiger Woods Golf, EA’s NHL series, Wii Sports

Conclusion

These are but some of the titles that have raised the bar in sports gaming, and compelled us to become more and more picky with our games. I am certain that people reading this article have their own list of games that have caused them to look down their nose at other, lesser games. That's why our new-found discerning nature is good for the sports-gaming consumer. It sets standards for developers to meet. A game that does not meet these standards is simply not going to be a success.

Let us all take a moment, however, to remember that gaming is still supposed to be enjoyable. That should be the ultimate goal for all developers.

...But they should also remember to include a meaty dynasty mode.


Member Comments
# 21 savoie2006 @ 07/24/09 04:28 AM
It's called capitalism folks. Just wait, several years from now when all of our favorite sports games finally have all of our favorite features and such, the next line of consoles will arrive. Then it's back to square one!

I think alot are misunderstanding what is being asked though. He is basically saying, that we as gamers(sports gamers), have gone from really not giving a rats with games like Techmo Super Bowl, to being borderline overly critical with current sports titles.

Apparently, most seem to think that it's because we are paying customers. Meaning that since our parents no longer buy our games, it means alot more to us. Now don't you feel bad for breaking all those toys your mom bought you? Anyways, I agree with this when it comes to getting a game relativly bug free and such. However, I feel the pickiness honestly goes WAY BEYOND all that. I mean the way alot of people disect animations, pictures, rosters, and attributes seems a bit obsessive to me. Given that sports developers only have a one year development cycle and are expected to fix this and fix that, add this and add that; it seems to me that sports gamers will never be happy.
 
# 22 HiTEqMETHOD @ 07/24/09 05:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trevytrev11
I think it's a cop out to blame the consumer...we're always going to want the best and most for our money whether it's a new house, a new car, a movie, a video game, etc.

I think the reason our expectations are so high is because we know that it can be done. I own a 360 and play MLB 2K9, yet I see The Show and see all of these things that are done better, so it becomes a bit frustrating to think that I'm basically paying the same price for a whole lot less. But every year, I expect and hope that 2K will shine and step it up to that next level. I expect it because I know it can be done and I'm paying the same price as others who are gettting the game that is getting it done.

Also, I go back 20 years to Baseball Btars, which had create a team, etc...and wonder why 20 years later, my game doesn't have that.

As others have said as well, the companies market the games as if they are perfect replica's of the sport when they miss major aspects of the sport.

Finally, there is no law that says a game has to come out every year, forcing them to rush through a development cycle, which means a released game filled with bugs. That is there choice. Most would b pleased with a quality title every other year and roster update in between.

My point exactly^^
 
# 23 HiTEqMETHOD @ 07/24/09 05:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorBait06NC
Sports gamers are not picky. They want whats expected. They pay 650 dollars for a system and want a great looking game. Cough......EA ......Cough can even make a game that has all its features working, Nor do they do what they say. Gltiches, roster failure, and game freezing while inputting stadium sounds??? Sports gamers want what they pay. This article is stupid and should be closed now. Did Adam Thompson write this?

No but Thompson knows the guy that did.
 
# 24 texbuk84 @ 07/24/09 08:05 AM
great man. i do remember nhlpa for the genesis and as a matter of fact, i still have that game. i'm about to play it to compare man.
 
# 25 allBthere @ 07/24/09 11:35 AM
i've been dissapointed by every sports game i've played this gen with the exception of UFC and to a lesser extent APF.

that's not my fault - sports games are being steam rolled by much better games in other genres.
 
# 26 Phoenix29 @ 07/24/09 12:50 PM
APF was horrible.

NHL 09 I thought was a great game minus the flaws online.
 
# 27 damarsh1 @ 07/24/09 03:13 PM
I know that I have become a little "picky" in picking my sports games lately, for example if the game is too long to play or if it is too "cartoonish" then I won't get it. That is why I really like the FIFA and Hockey games. As far as games of yesteryear, my most favorite game was Baseball stimulator 1.000 for Super Nintendo, I don't know how many hours I spent each day playing it and the season was only 30 games.
 
# 28 Phoenix29 @ 07/24/09 03:33 PM
I use to love Mutant League Hockey, and Football, imagine if they did a PS3/360 version of that then no one could complain
 
# 29 stlstudios189 @ 07/24/09 06:18 PM
We don't have anymore choices we have to buy the 1-2 ganes we get. I understand the reasons for this but, if I'm unhappy w/ Madden then oh well thats my only option
 
# 30 savoie2006 @ 07/24/09 08:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoenix29
APF was horrible.

NHL 09 I thought was a great game minus the players online.
There fixed.
 
# 31 Phoenix29 @ 07/24/09 09:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by savoie2006
There fixed.
Haha thanks.

And yes Bones Jackson was awesome :-D
 
# 32 acarrero @ 07/25/09 12:50 AM
The games I remember changing the sports gaming landscape for me when I was a kid were Tecmo Bowl, Earl Weaver Baseball. and Lakers vs. Celtics. Everything could be found in those titles, fun, realism, stats and season modes, etc. Comparing what I recall from Earl Weaver Baseball to what the options we have today, one can easily come to the conclusion, as good as games like MVP and The Show have been, that the main progress that has been made in those past 20 years or so have been in the looks and details departments. Or maybe I remember those games as better than they actually were...I don't think so though, we had classic games that back in the day were every bit as good, and actually probably more impressive at the time, than what we have now.
 
# 33 CreatineKasey @ 07/25/09 11:48 PM
Authenticity - can't argue too much. I do think All-Pro Football 2k8 feels authentic in its representation of t he game of football. The little things add up to a monumental difference. This could also qualify in gameplay.

Fun - Tecmo Super Bowl for the NES takes the cake for me. This game is fun. Simple as that. I never get sick of it.

Personally I think more developers should treat dynasty modes more like RPG's. I want abilities over numbers - and random events for me to overcome that emulate real life. Can't tell you how many times I've pandered for abilities over numbers. 2k has it right here.

Just throwing my opinions out there. I don't post enough on OS anymore
 
# 34 bizmax @ 07/26/09 10:08 AM
The cost of games and the hype marketing of promise to be better than last year that surround game launches is why we can and should be picky. For example. ncaa, madden, nba 2k, mwf2, halo is going to cost 370 dollars! that is a lot of money, period, and if we are going to pay that much we should get worth.
 
# 35 BlackRome @ 07/29/09 11:41 AM
I would have paid 2ksports $60 bucks just for a roster update for NBA2k8 instead of giving away $60 bucks for 2k9 which I barely played because it was so terrible.


Since I paid my $60 was a waste I do have the right to bitch.

I also will exercise my right to rent any game I'm thinking of buying.
 
# 36 ComfortablyLomb @ 07/29/09 03:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steadtler
If I may add something... the author mentions NHLPA Hockey as an ideal example of gameplay. Lets face it, you cannot have the same *kind* of fluidity in gameplay when controlling complex 3d, fully animated players that must look like real-life at the user`s whim as when those players where 2-frame sprites colliding as circles on a flat world. As the representation becomes more realistic, gameplay will authomatically become more constrained. If you want to go back to a gameplay similar as NHLPA Hockey, you would need to accept players clipping together and animating unrealistically.
Sign me up. Gameplay Godzilla to graphics' Tinkerbell.
 
# 37 yanpeijian @ 08/03/09 04:13 AM
Of course ,the game should be authentic with the reality!
But sometimes we are to try some other exciments!
 
# 38 sorerightthumb @ 08/03/09 11:26 PM
i remember the conversations me and my buddies had and still have. before the days of online gaming me and several friends would play sports games. either round robins or multitap football games all together in one room with cords attached to our controllers. to us graphics and game play meant something. not how much fake seats at a fake stadium cost. franchise modes and mini games ruined sports games!
 
# 39 genie1985 @ 08/31/09 09:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MMChrisS
Sports gamers are a difficult bunch to get along with -- I would know since I'm part of that bunch. We used to be happy with decent on-field action and a patched-together season mode.

Oh how things have changed.

Now it's almost fitting to compare modern sports gamers to fans of role-playing games. Ardent RPG fans demand nothing less than perfection. Woe is the developer that does not live up to the latest Final Fantasy. Woe is the developer who does not understand the subtle differences between a wood elf and a high elf. You get the idea.

Scoff if you will, but the fact of the matter is that aficionados of sports games are not much better. In fact, I would argue that we have become worse. We demand that our games be authentic, replayable, and somewhere further down this list, enjoyable. Sports games have turned us into monsters, highly educated and discerning monsters.

Sp let us take a look at what the modern sports game must include, as well as some of the culprits that have raised our expectations to these heights.

Read more - Who is to blame for sports gamers being so picky?

Well written!Sports games really bring us a lot,what we can do about it is just try our best to make it became better than actuality!click me!
 
# 40 yanpeijian @ 09/05/09 03:35 AM
Maybe the tickets are too expensive ,and people expect the game pickily!What's more they are the fans of the team or someone,of course ,they would hope the game will be wonderful!
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.