Home
OS Scores Explained MLB 15 The Show Overview (PS4)
Pros
Directional hitting, franchise mode one of best in sports, beautiful graphics, immersive radio show.
Cons
Too few animations which recycle themselves, bad and boring commentary, changes to pure analog hitting.
Bottom Line
Another step forward for the series, some will fault the game for being too safe, but MLB 15 is a great experience for all baseball fans.
8.5
out of 10
MLB 15 The Show REVIEW

MLB 15 The Show Review (PS4)

MLB 15 The Show has the look, sound and feel of baseball. The Show doesn't do many things great -- part of SCEA's "if it's not broken, don't fix it" unwillingness to take big risks -- but it does just about everything really well. And in a world where games are shipping with just about nothing working as it's supposed to, it's a relief to say that MLB 15 The Show is about as rock-solid as it gets.

As it does every year, this year's iteration focuses on how to move forward without taking any steps back. Little things like improved grass patterns and adding swing animations don't stand out too much at first, but it brings the game's replayability to an all-time high. The same goes with its game modes, where simple changes should go a long way in keeping players invested in their franchise, or Road to the Show.

At the end of the day, MLB The Show is always going to be about the little things. And for this year, at the very least, that seems perfectly reasonable.

Gameplay

The most significant change to gameplay is the all new directional hitting. It still may be a bit early to count it as a success, but it's learning curve gives even the most veteran players a new feature to master. When used properly, there's an overwhelming sense of achievement, as the game isn't afraid to punish you for failure.

The same could be said about everything else in the game. Situational hitting and pitching is once again heart-pounding and sweat-inducing. The odds of making it out alive on an 0-2 count feel so terribly low that sometimes the user is bound to get itself out just by overthinking things. The opposite can be said of hitters counts: there's a general confidence that goes along with being in charge of a count, often winding up in a big hit. This is the dynamic that The Show has mastered over the years, and small tweaks like directional hitting only continue to liven it up.

That being said, there is one rather large, disappointment in terms of gameplay and controls. Pure analog has been practically cut in half, with players no longer being in control of the stride. For a series that prides itself on keeping old control schemes at the benefit of its user's comfort levels, this is a baffling move.

Another issue with MLB 15 The Show is that the same animations pop up far too frequently. It wouldn't be the worst thing in the world if all of these animations were fresh to the series, but about 90 percent of them have carried over from old titles. Seeing two plays back to back where my 250 pound first baseman makes the same fielding animation as my 170 pound shortstop is an immersion killer.

That said, there's a lot of good to be found in this year's gameplay. Quick counts work better than ever and games can still be completed in about half an hour without having to skip through cutscenes. Fielding A.I. is much improved, with better fielders taking a noticeably better route to balls than poor fielders. All the same, it isn't quite where it needs to be. Players are still far too passive, resulting in more infield singles than there should be.

Presentation

The mark of a good sports title is in its ability to engross its players into its universe. MLB The Show does a pretty good job of that, outside of bland commentary that still feels copy and pasted.

Despite Matt Vasgersian's best efforts, the commentary is still the worst in the sports genre. Karros and Lyons seem uninterested for 95 percent of the game, only to feel like it's Game 7 in October the rest of the 5 percent. Tacky one-liners and repeated lines make for some serious eye-rolling. Ultimately, players are going to want to turn commentary off for a large portion of their games, if not all of them. That said, Mike Carlucci makes his return as public address announcer and he's just as awesome as ever.

Most things related to presentation are much improved, however. For one, the game looks absolutely stunning. Player models aren't quite where they need to be but just about everything else is indistinguishable from real life. Stadiums look nearly perfect, with the only eye-sore being washed out text on some of the backstops. Even fans looks realistic, often having conversations with one another and frequenting the stairway as they go up to get concessions. It is clear from the get-go that SCEA wanted its players to feel more like they're at a baseball game, rather than watching one on television. The lone argument to this is a fantastic looking score bug in the upper-lefthand corner of the screen. That matched with the return of local broadcast camera angles while pitching is enough to make anyone feel right at home.

Equipment junkies will be extremely pleased with this year's game. Authentic gear has finally made its way to The Show and it does so commandingly. Several of baseball's biggest brands (Louisville Slugger, Nike, etc) are in the game and give you a variety of options to freshen up your player's look.

Game Modes

Franchise has slowly tweaked its way into being one of the best, if not the best, in the genre. Improved trade logic and contract signings go a long way, especially when you consider the tighter budgets that every team is working with. Team's are consistently looking to ditch bad contracts while also holding their big-name prospects close to the vest. An all new trade-finder is a nice little time saver for those who can't be bothered to go through every team trying to find the right trade. Though, there are still too few available offers - which is likely just a result of the game's strong trade logic. Teams have constantly changing trade mentalities, and that really comes through in MLB 15 The Show.

The new radio show is well implemented, and the perfect way for The Show to immerse its players into a long franchise. Here, repeated lines seem more more acceptable when you consider the wealth of information that Justin Allegri has to run through on a yearly (and often daily) basis. The biggest moves and previous day's stats are a staple of the show, and it allows players to really sink into the franchise without having to scroll though box scores and transactions every day. Hopefully the show will have a little more variety moving forward, but its a strong start.

Road to the Show doesn't see a lot of changes, but it continues to plop you down onto the baseball field with immense confidence in what it's trying to do. A continuing trend from last year's game, the audio is absolutely fantastic. The crunch of cleats atop the dirt as your player is desperately trying to make it safely to first is an unparalleled experience in the "be a pro" modes in today's sports genre. The commentary is still really bad, and frequently has bad cuts due to the way the mode simulates you forward, but here its easier to justify turning it off all together and just enjoying the sounds of The Show.

Online Play

Online play is much improved, with the sole exception of a still convoluted Online Franchise mode. There is much less lag than in previous years, and in ten online games or so, I haven't had a single one drop due to a bad connection. Online is still far from MLB The Show's strong suit, but it's good to see that SCEA has given it some attention. That said, it's still hard to get a competitive game going with online players. Opponents frequently will do things such as throwing right at your players, throwing all curveballs or sliders, and swinging at everything that moves on the opposite end. This isn't the game's fault, obviously, but it would be nice if there was a better way to connect with players who better intentions. With the rising number of users moving to online play almost exclusively, it seems like a strong bet that the game puts a more heavy focus on online modes in the future.

Bottom Line

MLB 15 The Show might be the perfect example of how small steps forward without changing the core experience is the best way to develop a series. There's little doubt that, sooner rather than later, SCEA is going to have to take some risks. Two years into the development cycle of the PS4, next year's game will have no excuse to have a variety of new additions on top of new animations.

But this year, the one that counts, the game can't be thought of as anything but a success. Fans of baseball are still in great hands with MLB The Show, and that's one thing I don't see changing anytime soon.


Score: 8.5 (Great)


MLB 15 The Show Videos
Member Comments
# 61 My993C2 @ 04/08/15 10:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mets7766
I got picked off twice yesterday...
I guess you guys do not know what a MoM game is. MoM stands for "Manage Only Mode". I'm not talking about when you as a human are controlling the base runners where you have purposely decided to take an extra large lead and as a result are getting picked off by the CPU pitcher. No I'm talking about CPU controlled pitchers and CPU controlled base runners here, as in how MoM games and CPU vs CPU games work, where pick offs have been completely removed from the game where they once worked fine in previous years.
 
# 62 Knight165 @ 04/08/15 11:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsquigg
No, you're absolutely right. I've never had an elk steak before, but everyone knows it tastes terrible. And having never lived in a mansion, I can say they are a big waste of space.
Except if he would have played the game....he would have known that uniforms do get dirty and attendance is indeed dynamic and dependent on the very factors he listed as something the game SHOULD do(it does...but of course...if he played....he would know instead of compiling so called negatives that he couldn't verify himself)

I'm not even going to get into the rest of his post.....the MoM part is ridiculous.
But no.....let's continue to post about things we don't really know about first hand. It makes for such compelling reading.

M.K.
Knight165
 
# 63 cubfaninga @ 04/09/15 12:50 AM
Ok guys, my beef with SCEA is that #1. I am a Cub fan and like to use Travis Wood as a pinch hitter. After i pinch hit for him he has to stay in the game and pitch to at least one batter. That ain't right. I should be able to use him and then put a different pitcher to continue (Oh...and this is an OLD BUG #2 What is so hard about using the regional/local pa announcers & tv broadcasters and commentary? ? ? I guess the hardest part would be getting all 60 or 70 of them together for one weekend in San Diego. As far as the rest everything is great. OH I almost forget the pure analog hitting is gone. I don't even like it anymore. I can't control my players stride? Why did you take it away? I have to admit, I guess they want you to use directional hitting which they hit a home run with...Any thoughts????
 
# 64 Smallville102001 @ 04/09/15 12:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by My993C2
I guess you guys do not know what a MoM game is. MoM stands for "Manage Only Mode". I'm not talking about when you as a human are controlling the base runners where you have purposely decided to take an extra large lead and as a result are getting picked off by the CPU pitcher. No I'm talking about CPU controlled pitchers and CPU controlled base runners here, as in how MoM games and CPU vs CPU games work, where pick offs have been completely removed from the game where they once worked fine in previous years.


Do people really watch CPU games? What is the point? I think not many people would do that. I don't have the free time like I used to for video games and I have a lot of another games I still need to play more of or beat to. I just find it kind of pointless to do.
 
# 65 My993C2 @ 04/09/15 01:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smallville102001
Do people really watch CPU games? What is the point? I think not many people would do that. I don't have the free time like I used to for video games and I have a lot of another games I still need to play more of or beat to. I just find it kind of pointless to do.
You know what I think is pointless, attempting to demean people on the internet for enjoying the game the way they like to enjoy it. Now that's pointless. But hey knock yourself out if it makes you feel better about yourself.
 
# 66 Smallville102001 @ 04/09/15 01:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by My993C2
You know what I think is pointless, attempting to demean people on the internet for enjoying the game the way they like to enjoy it. Now that's pointless. But hey knock yourself out if it makes you feel better about yourself.


Not trying to demean people just how I fell and I bet a lot of people don't play that mode so for a lot of people that is not going to be an issue that is all. That is why a lot of people are not talking about it. It was said that only like 5% of people used zone+ hitting last year and that is why they took the stride out. I would bet that the % of people that play MOM is even lower then that.
 
# 67 sink4ever @ 04/09/15 10:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight165
Except if he would have played the game....he would have known that uniforms do get dirty and attendance is indeed dynamic and dependent on the very factors he listed as something the game SHOULD do(it does...but of course...if he played....he would know instead of compiling so called negatives that he couldn't verify himself)

I'm not even going to get into the rest of his post.....the MoM part is ridiculous.
But no.....let's continue to post about things we don't really know about first hand. It makes for such compelling reading.

M.K.
Knight165
I thought jsquigg was being sarcastic, although maybe my sarcasm meter is broken. Hey jsquigg, let me know if you were being serious so I can take my "like" back.

Anyway, I definitely agree it's crazy to try to review a game you haven't played. Just makes no sense whatsoever.
 
# 68 jcar0725 @ 04/09/15 11:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mets7766
I got picked off twice yesterday...
In my franchise, the CPU tried to pick me off first base a handful of times late in the game, tie score, and I wasn't stepping off to a bigger lead when it happened. Not in an MOM game.
 
# 69 Dolenz @ 04/09/15 11:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYGiants4Natic
Shocked that the review did not mention the issues that have been heavily reported

Resolution changing when selecting pitch and hair resolution changing along with handles on seats changing.

The horrible foul ball warping into an out that has happened a bunch of times already for me in different parks

The 2 strike out at first bug that has happen a few times

Those are bad bugs and should be counted to score
But I have played every day and not noticed any of those so it is possible the reviewer did not either.

This is a big game with multiple modes. It is going to be really hard for someone to cover everything after only playing a week.

Maybe the bugs should be mentioned but if I don't see them or can't replicate them they would not affect my score of the game.
 
# 70 jcar0725 @ 04/09/15 11:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYGiants4Natic
Shocked that the review did not mention the issues that have been heavily reported

Resolution changing when selecting pitch and hair resolution changing along with handles on seats changing.

The horrible foul ball warping into an out that has happened a bunch of times already for me in different parks

The 2 strike out at first bug that has happen a few times

Those are bad bugs and should be counted to score
I haven't seen any of these. The game runs smooth as silk.
 
# 71 CujoMatty @ 04/09/15 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVCbearcat10
This is the problem with the sports reviews. The Show is a victim of it's own success. If the next Madden would put out a game the same quality as the Show, it would be getting 9.5's and the internet may literally explode. The reviews (especially on Metacritic) will reflect that many other games are better than the Show when that really isn't the case.

Sports reviews really need 2 scores. One based on how it rates compared to the franchise itself and one for how it compares to other sports games. I can see the argument for some staleness (but it's a good problem to have in their case because so much is done right). So compared to itself, maybe it gets a lower score. However, compared to FIFA, Madden, etc, it should be at the top in review scores because it might be the best sim of the sport it represents.
You just described what I hate about the internet. Lol
not only should we stop putting so much importance on the number associated
With a review but people also need to stop comparing them to other games and just holding the game to its own standard.

I agree that mlb 15 the show is the best sports game ever but but baseball's my favorite sport. I absolutely one million percent guarantee that just as many people feel that way about nba 2k and with soccer's worldwide popularity even more people feel that way about fifa. I'm sure even some believe that about madden.

You can't factually say mlb the show is the best sports game ever. It's subjective. People who feel it's the best game ever want it to be rated the best game ever on metacritic because that would somehow make it a fact. It really doesn't make it that way.

I could care less about what metacritic thinks.
 
# 72 Dolenz @ 04/09/15 11:58 AM
Metacritic scores can be used as a rough gauge but should never be taken as gospel, especially with Sports games because most reviewers at the major sites are not really sports game fans.
 
# 73 Bobhead @ 04/09/15 12:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVCbearcat10
This is the problem with the sports reviews. The Show is a victim of it's own success. If the next Madden would put out a game the same quality as the Show, it would be getting 9.5's and the internet may literally explode. The reviews (especially on Metacritic) will reflect that many other games are better than the Show when that really isn't the case.

Sports reviews really need 2 scores. One based on how it rates compared to the franchise itself and one for how it compares to other sports games. I can see the argument for some staleness (but it's a good problem to have in their case because so much is done right). So compared to itself, maybe it gets a lower score. However, compared to FIFA, Madden, etc, it should be at the top in review scores because it might be the best sim of the sport it represents.
Good post. I'd say the same should be said about not just sports games, but any "installment" game, ie: Call of Duty...

But yeah, penalizing the game because previous games were already awesome is a bit disingenuous.

Imagine if people didn't buy Ford-made cars simply because they were "a lot like other cars." Or "my house is really great but man... the bathroom has a toilet, tub, and sink just like my previous house did. I think it's time houses went in a different direction!"

Improvements are always welcome, but it's overall quality that should be evaluated, not just an arbitrary measure of uniqueness.
 
# 74 KillerSloth @ 04/09/15 05:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tabarnes19
I never understand the phrase "take big risks to move forward. "

There isn't a whole lot that I would want to change to enjoy the game.

There is a saying that the grass is not always greener on the other side.

Changing some of the game engines radically could destroy what we love about the game.

I'm hoping that they continue to add refinements and build the game modes to the next levels.
I agree, reviews for the show are 77 on metacritic...WHAT? It's by far the best sports sim and it is significantly improved IMO, Carry over saves is not getting near enough credit it is the FIRST series in history to do it.

Fielding is massively improved.

ONline is good this year

Directional hitting is great

Licensed gear

Graphics significantly better

How can this game be rated lower then madden......Reviews for this game are a joke,.

How can it be drastically different? It already plays an amazing game of baseball , it's like reviewers want change just for the sake of it without thinking of what they could possible change and the repercussions.
 
# 75 KillerSloth @ 04/09/15 05:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Factzzz
A "big risk" that needs to be taken is re-doing player models, if not completely, then adding a lot more details and variety to them as they are now.

That'll help the game "move forward."
Thats not a big risk, it is just time consuming please.
 
# 76 KillerSloth @ 04/09/15 05:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronoko
It's surprising to me this game currently stands at 75 at metacritic, but it's still early. I don't see how anyone can play this with all it has to offer and come away thinking it's not at least in the 80s.
It's moronic, have no idea what reviewers are thinking with the show, it's pathetic.
 
# 77 KillerSloth @ 04/09/15 05:58 PM
Game doesn;t do anything great......I am amazed at that line. I am not sure what is up with the media and the show but it sure seems to me it is being judged much harsher then other sports games.
 
# 78 KillerSloth @ 04/09/15 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mets7766
First off, I love The Show. I play it every year and never regret my purchase. That being said, the ps2/ps3 player models and animations have to go. The absolutely beautiful lighting and stadium environments make these holdovers really stick out. Some animations have been in the game since, literally, '05 or '06. It's like Naomi Watts with a big hairy mole...
There is nothing but nonsense in your post, nothing in the show is PS2 era level, jesus.
 
# 79 kehlis @ 04/09/15 06:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerSloth
There is nothing but nonsense in your post, nothing in the show is PS2 era level, jesus.
You need to take it easy a bit.

Just a suggestion.



Also, please use the multi quote function if you can instead of back to back to back to back posts.
 
# 80 KillerSloth @ 04/09/15 06:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kehlis
You need to take it easy a bit.

Just a suggestion.



Also, please use the multi quote function if you can instead of back to back to back to back posts.
My apologies, dumb question time, how do I multi-quote?
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.