Home
MLB The Show 17 News Post


So yesterday we had a little game design round-table with everyone on how to handle playing out of position better. (First and foremost we weren't going to talk about this in a vlog or the streams. So that's why we are talking about this now.) We hope you guys enjoy this little behind the scenes look.

A little back story on how we got here, I sent an email to one of the programmers inquiring what could be done to A. make utility players more valuable, B. discourage people from playing guys out of position (especially in DD) to get more bats in the lineup, and C. make secondary positions matter more.

A few of us (I'm lying it was just me) wanted to go full napalm and just completely nerf anyone playing out of position which we currently do in some instances. However SS and 2nd baseman shouldn't get nerfed too bad playing other IF positions. But we all know that strong defensive SS for example could probably play a decent 2nd base if he had to, right?

That's the cliff notes version of how the round-table came to be. (fyi this all happened over the course of the last 3 work days Saturday, Sunday and Monday) After we all talked and hashed it out here's the email the lead programmer sent everyone after he made the changes based on the discussion. (There are no edits to the email just raw information enjoy.)

"I (Jeff lead programmer) just checked in the following changes:

• Gill (Lead Gameplay Producer you've seen Gill on all the Gameplay streams) and I made few changes to the out-of-position table to penalize guys a little more in certain combinations
• When calculating a fielder’s attribute when he’s out of position, it will now look at his secondary positions as well as his primary position and will calculate his attribute for each position he can play using the out-of-position chart. His attribute will be the highest of these values.
• Any fielder playing middle infielder that does not have at least one of the middle infielder positions as a primary or secondary position will now use the out-of-position double play turns, regardless of his fielding attribute after the out-of-position adjustment.
• Any left handed fielder playing C, 2B, 3B or SS will only receive 10% of their fielding attribute (which will force missed branches.)

Here are a few examples that is impacted by a couple of these changes:

Player A. on Houston is a 3B with LF and SS as secondary positions. His fielding ability is 83. I moved him to 2nd base. Using the old logic, he would have lost 40% of his attribute, leaving him as about a 49.

With the new logic, since player A. has SS as a secondary position, it uses the SS  2B penalty instead of the 3B  2B penalty, which is only 10%. We also take the extra 5% off because we’re basing this off of a secondary position, but even with a 15% penalty, he’s now only brought down to a 70 instead of 49. Also, since he has SS as a secondary position, he’s still allowed to use the normal double play turns.

Another example: player B. is a 3B with no secondary positions and a fielding ability of 84. I move him to 2nd base. A 3B playing 2B is penalized 40%, so that would leave him with an attribute of about 50. This is above the “low ability” cutoff of 30, so using the old logic, he would have been able to do the athletic double play turns. With the new logic, since he’s not able to play either of the middle infield positions, he’ll only use the out-of-position double play turns. Any of his other throws will still branch, but his DP turns will be significantly slower than a normal 2B.

Also, when Gill and I adjusted the chart, we made it so that no outfielder moved into the infield would end up with fielding ability above 30. This will ensure that outfielders playing in the infield are always treated as “low ability”. Unless, of course, they have a secondary infield position that causes them to get less of a penalty.

Disclaimer we are still testing and there is a possibility we might change things so nothing is concrete. (We aren't taking suggestions)However we hope you all enjoy this incoherent behind the scenes look at The Show take care.

Game: MLB The Show 17Hype Score: 9/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS4Votes for game: 36 - View All
Member Comments
# 61 bxphenom7 @ 02/03/17 09:51 AM
Would be cool to be able to have a player learn a new position as well.
 
# 62 Culture Rot @ 02/03/17 12:02 PM
Thanks for this, it makes a real difference
 
# 63 gamer052001 @ 02/04/17 03:28 PM
Great news on all changes!

Will there be a way to select secondary positions for pitchers? In the past guys like Jason Lane were given OF for secondary position, but we could not edit to add for other pitchers. I'm thinking of Travis Wood, Jordan Schafer, Christian Bethancourt, and even Shohei Otani as a CAP.
 
# 64 Caulfield @ 02/05/17 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tessl
If I was going to offer a suggestion to Russell and his fellow developers regarding secondary positions it would be to have a more significant penalty for secondary position at which he player only played a tiny percentage of games at.

For example in 2016 Wil Myers played 149 games at 1B, 7 games in RF, 3 games in LF and 1 game at 3B. Myers has play OF in 2015 and 2014 and is a competent outfielder but if he gets 3B as a secondary position with a small penalty for secondary position he would probably be as good defensively as many everyday third basemen which isn't realistic because Myers has only played less than 1% of games at 3B.

I'm not sure what the penalty should be or what percentage of games he should have to play at a certain position but I'm confident the developers could brainstorm that and come up with a realistic solution.

Not a huge issue and it might be too late to get in this year's game but it would add realism.
The thing is playing more games in and of itself doesnt make you better at a position.
Somebody like SS/3B Jonathan Villar (11 games at 2B) should be able to play 2B better and be higher rated than someone like, say, 1B/3B Matt Carpenter (40 games at 2B).
Also, when the community creates historical (or even OSFM) roster, I dont know if a formula could translate well. But still, it would at least be something worth the dev's brainstorming to see if its feasible.
 
# 65 Bobhead @ 02/05/17 02:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tessl
If I was going to offer a suggestion to Russell and his fellow developers regarding secondary positions it would be to have a more significant penalty for secondary position at which he player only played a tiny percentage of games at.

For example in 2016 Wil Myers played 149 games at 1B, 7 games in RF, 3 games in LF and 1 game at 3B. Myers has play OF in 2015 and 2014 and is a competent outfielder but if he gets 3B as a secondary position with a small penalty for secondary position he would probably be as good defensively as many everyday third basemen which isn't realistic because Myers has only played less than 1% of games at 3B.

I'm not sure what the penalty should be or what percentage of games he should have to play at a certain position but I'm confident the developers could brainstorm that and come up with a realistic solution.

Not a huge issue and it might be too late to get in this year's game but it would add realism.
Well in this scenario, based on SCEA's new system, Myers would simply not have 3B as an official secondary position in The Show. Then he'd have the 1B -> 3B transition penalty which would accomplish the lesser skill level you are looking for.

Maybe they can differentiate between positions a player can be placed at (eg: Myers at third) and actual secondary positions where the player is actually comfortable.
 
# 66 sydrogerdavid @ 02/05/17 09:39 PM
For the record, Matt Carpenter has played 188 games at second base. I'm not sure how he'd compare to Villar, but don't sell him short.
 
# 67 Caulfield @ 02/05/17 10:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sydrogerdavid
For the record, Matt Carpenter has played 188 games at second base. I'm not sure how he'd compare to Villar, but don't sell him short.
I probably should have clarified the 40 games I was referring to was in 2016.
 
# 68 gamer052001 @ 03/05/17 06:33 PM
Has anyone heard any rumors on editing a pitcher's secondary position for '17?
 
# 69 Caulfield @ 03/05/17 06:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gamer052001
Has anyone heard any rumors on editing a pitcher's secondary position for '17?
rumours - yes
confirmation - no
expectation - no
but then, when they made it possible for lefty shortstop, I wasnt expecting that either
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.