Home
Madden NFL 13 News Post



These are the team overall ratings from the E3 build so obviously they're not final just yet. What do all you think? Any anomalies?

Game: Madden NFL 13Reader Score: 6/10 - Vote Now
Platform: PS3 / Wii U / Xbox 360Votes for game: 77 - View All
Madden NFL 13 Videos
Member Comments
# 41 Shawnj86 @ 06/07/12 06:25 PM
I think the Giants should be a little bit higher but it how you play that really matters
 
# 42 TheBleedingRed21 @ 06/07/12 06:28 PM
Ouch, My colts 66..
 
# 43 MattyEdgeworth @ 06/07/12 06:29 PM
Redskins at 78...

 
# 44 MDTerps94 @ 06/07/12 06:32 PM
78 is just right for skins. they have a good team. 6 of the 11 losses were by one possession. With Rex who just sucks completely. I think they scored them correct. RG3 is already better without a game played then rex is now. I do agree the texans should be top 5 team. The redskins ovr is right but others are wrong. dont say skins dont deserve cuz they do the other teams dont deserve their low ratings though. and believe me the skins defense carries a lot of this.
 
# 45 StL_RamZ @ 06/07/12 06:36 PM
Sheesh the dolphin are one of the worst teams in madden all because of their trash offense

My team, the rams are a 71 ugh well I can live with it
 
# 46 Paulinho @ 06/07/12 06:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by platinumplayajc
A joke? They have arguably the top talent in the game.
Yeah the "Dream Team" looked real amazing last year. Team sucks.
 
# 47 juggalotusx @ 06/07/12 06:39 PM
So lets get this right, the Giants Superbowl winners twice in the last few years still rated lower than 2 other teams. Bears 81 just as good as 49ers 81? Think not. 49ers pounded Steelers last year but they get a 85,hmmmm. Im glad they have made bigger spaces between teams and ovrs but really the 49ers one game away and only a 81, we would put a hurting on the bears.
 
# 48 theGreatoneNO @ 06/07/12 06:39 PM
The Lions and The Saints are rated too low, plain and simple
 
# 49 AiDub @ 06/07/12 06:40 PM
My Colts at 66? Yikes! HOWEVER it is a bitter sweet 66 for me. I love playing franchise mode with bad teams and building them up so it looks like I'm actually going to be able to do that with my home team finally XD
 
# 50 NowAndLaterCARZ @ 06/07/12 06:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDTerps94
78 is just right for skins. they have a good team. 6 of the 11 losses were by one possession. With Rex who just sucks completely. I think they scored them correct. RG3 is already better without a game played then rex is now. I do agree the texans should be top 5 team. The redskins ovr is right but others are wrong. dont say skins dont deserve cuz they do the other teams dont deserve their low ratings though. and believe me the skins defense carries a lot of this.
yea i agree skins should be 78, but lions should be higher than 77 maybe 82. and ravens 83
 
# 51 jWILL253 @ 06/07/12 06:52 PM
The Giants and Patriots are both in the mid 80's. And, there isn't one single team in the high 80's, low 90's... fits...
 
# 52 themassacre771.1 @ 06/07/12 06:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jWILL10
The Giants and Patriots are both in the mid 80's. And, there isn't one single team in the high 80's, low 90's... fits...
Yeah, if you look at the spread I think everything fits. Ravens should prob get a bump though seeing as they were a lee evans goof from beating them.
 
# 53 Equinox831 @ 06/07/12 06:58 PM
I think people forget that these ratings are based on the player overalls in game heading into the season. So you can pretty much throw out what happened between teams last year because that was last year.
 
# 54 NowAndLaterCARZ @ 06/07/12 06:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by themassacre771.1
Yeah, if you look at the spread I think everything fits. Ravens should prob get a bump though seeing as they were a lee evans goof from beating them.
and a missed cundiff 24 yd field goal away from ot
 
# 55 GruffyMcGuiness @ 06/07/12 07:02 PM
I was about to be mad about the rating of the Falcons until I saw they aren't making everyone a 90 this year

Sent from my DROID4 using Tapatalk 2
 
# 56 davidsaurus @ 06/07/12 07:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by raidertiger
Raiders a 70 going 8-8? Eagles a 84 going 8-8? Wow.
'Cept the raiders have Darren McFadden and that's about it.. the eagles on the other hand have one of the biggest rosters in the NFL. Use some logic.
 
# 57 jfsolo @ 06/07/12 07:18 PM
My Rams are appropriately ****ty, they are a perfect team to begin a career with.
 
# 58 microsales25 @ 06/07/12 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidsaurus
'Cept the raiders have Darren McFadden and that's about it.. the eagles on the other hand have one of the biggest rosters in the NFL. Use some logic.
The Raiders are ok at 70 but the Eagles should be at 76.
 
# 59 87Birdman @ 06/07/12 07:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidsaurus
'Cept the raiders have Darren McFadden and that's about it.. the eagles on the other hand have one of the biggest rosters in the NFL. Use some logic.

I will use some logic then

Champ > then any corner on the Eagels
Manning > Vick
Doom > any end on the eagles
Miller & Williams > any OLB for the eagles

McCoy> Mcghee
Celic> Dressen
Eagles WR > Broncos WR (due to young roster for Broncos)

So I need to hear how how the Eagles are still an 84 while another 8-8 team is 76. Eagles are rated to high due to the favoritism that the NFC East gets. All those teams are fairly overrated, except the Giants, but they earned their rating.

But I like how these are so spread out hopefully that means actual individual ratings are stretched also.
 
# 60 TalenT @ 06/07/12 07:37 PM
Honestly, I don't give a damn how each team is ranked...as long as they play the way the should and individual players play like their real life counterparts. It doesn't really matter.
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.