Home
NBA 2K12 News Post



This video is also available on the OS Youtube channel, please subscribe while you're there.

Game: NBA 2K12Reader Score: 8/10 - Vote Now
Platform: iOS / PC / PS3 / Xbox 360Votes for game: 102 - View All
NBA 2K12 Videos
Member Comments
# 61 Twista209 @ 03/25/12 12:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norris_Cole
I hope tonight's game opened the 2k insider eyes, Brandan Wright with 7 blocks , he probably leads the league in blocks per minute (maybe him or larry sanders) but he is only rated 71 in blocks!! Not to mention his athleticism should be seriously bumped, I've been tweeting the insider for weeks but no luck, he doesn't care about these kind of players.
Definately, Wright had a great game! Mavs needed that win. Same for Larry Sanders.
 
# 62 FAM CEO @ 03/26/12 09:51 PM
Does anyone know if this latest update will reach online association? The current roster still has Fisher on the Rockets and Gilbert in free agency.

Thanks
 
# 63 Norris_Cole @ 03/26/12 11:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FAM CEO
Does anyone know if this latest update will reach online association? The current roster still has Fisher on the Rockets and Gilbert in free agency.

Thanks
Whenever the lazy insider wants, it could be after 1 week of after one month.

Nba live I'm waiting for you
 
# 64 FAM CEO @ 03/27/12 12:34 AM
I hope they do it soon. I have reset my league 3 times with all these updates. This should be the last one
 
# 65 Twista209 @ 03/27/12 11:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sword1986
What is up with Tyson Chandler (77) and DeMarcus Cousins (78) being rated higher than Brook Lopez? If they're going to be rated that high, Lopez should be rated at 79 overall. I understand the ratings don't mean a thing and player's still play like they're supposed to but this is blasphemy.

The way they had them before on the default was perfect. Chandler 70, Cousins 71. Brook Lopez is a solid Center, can do everything except REBOUND. I think 76 is perfect for him, because I wouldn't rate Bogut any higher than 78 because Bogut is a very good Center but Cousins and Chandler, no way 2K.

also, bring Deron Williams back up to a 90 overall.
Good points, I agree and especially with Deron Williams.
 
# 66 beast10 @ 03/27/12 01:42 PM
No matter how many times this is said some of you guys just don't get it. A player overall doesn't mean anything it's all about their abilities!
 
# 67 XenoZograscope @ 03/27/12 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beast10
No matter how many times this is said some of you guys just don't get it. A player overall doesn't mean anything it's all about their abilities!
I been stop trying to explain that man, they wont listen lol... its either that or they just don't understand.
 
# 68 beast10 @ 03/27/12 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angel_G
too high, midrange 78, 3pt 76
Gerald Green is shooting 48% from mid range. With 2k's formula he would indeed have a 85-90.
 
# 69 Paul Pierce_OS @ 03/27/12 04:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sword1986
If player overall doesn't mean anything, then why are they getting raises? What is Tyson Chandler and DeMarcus Cousins doing to warrant such an increase. Chandler is playing the same way he did in Dallas last season, and at 70 overall he was still dominant. Why is he a 77? Cousins, I can understand an increase in overall but not better than Lopez. Cousins should be atleast 73-75 range, he stepped his game up. If Cousins is going to be 78, Lopez needs to be 79 and if Lopez is a 79, Bogut has to be rated an 80 - Bogut and Lopez are way better than Cousins and Chandler, they shouldn't even be cataloged in the same tier.
Because, 2k is doing it for the casual fans to see their player "rated" at high levels to get "boosts" a lot of the 2k ratings are ****ed up seriously over rating players in attributes.
 
# 70 beast10 @ 03/27/12 05:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sword1986
If player overall doesn't mean anything, then why are they getting raises? What is Tyson Chandler and DeMarcus Cousins doing to warrant such an increase. Chandler is playing the same way he did in Dallas last season, and at 70 overall he was still dominant. Why is he a 77? Cousins, I can understand an increase in overall but not better than Lopez. Cousins should be atleast 73-75 range, he stepped his game up. If Cousins is going to be 78, Lopez needs to be 79 and if Lopez is a 79, Bogut has to be rated an 80 - Bogut and Lopez are way better than Cousins and Chandler, they shouldn't even be cataloged in the same tier.
Because they are clearly getting better at the listed attributes. And Cousins Isn't doing anything but getting more offensive boards and chocking on putbacks he's a good player but very sloppy. And just because a player has a higher rating doesn't mean he is better than another.
 
# 71 DoubleJ13 @ 03/27/12 05:45 PM
Brook Lopez isn't a great (or even good for his size) rebounder. For a center that will hurt his rating, same reason Dirk isn't rated in the 90s.
 
# 72 Norris_Cole @ 03/27/12 06:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beast10
Gerald Green is shooting 48% from mid range. With 2k's formula he would indeed have a 85-90.
he is shooting 42% with a low volume, (just 18 mid range shoots made so far) 85-90?? lol , then LaMarcus Aldridge should be 130
 
# 73 beast10 @ 03/27/12 06:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norris_Cole
he is shooting 42% with a low volume, (just 18 mid range shoots made so far) 85-90?? lol , then LaMarcus Aldridge should be 130
Gerald Green Is shooting 48% From 16-23 Check Hoopsdata. He's made 18 three point shots, three pointers are not mid-range shots.
 
# 74 Norris_Cole @ 03/27/12 07:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beast10
Gerald Green Is shooting 48% From 16-23 Check Hoopsdata. He's made 18 three point shots, three pointers are not mid-range shots.
No , he is shooting 42%, but 42-48 doesn't matter, he hasn't made enough mid range shoots to even consider giving him an 80. 70 - 74 should be fine

http://www.nba.com/advancedstats/player.html#Gerald-Green|101123;year=201112;season=r
 
# 75 Paul Pierce_OS @ 03/27/12 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norris_Cole
No , he is shooting 42%, but 42-48 doesn't matter, he hasn't made enough mid range shoots to even consider giving him an 80. 70 - 74 should be fine

http://www.nba.com/advancedstats/player.html#Gerald-Green|101123;year=201112;season=r
I think he was saying based on 2ks formulas that's what the rating should be....
 
# 76 Goffs @ 03/27/12 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beast10
Because they are clearly getting better at the listed attributes. And Cousins Isn't doing anything but getting more offensive boards and chocking on putbacks he's a good player but very sloppy. And just because a player has a higher rating doesn't mean he is better than another.
This...do you guys just look at the numbers and go ape ****? If you actually play the game the tiny boost in ratings doesn't really do much.
 
# 77 Norris_Cole @ 03/27/12 07:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Pierce
I think he was saying based on 2ks formulas that's what the rating should be....
I know, but you can't give a 85 - 90 in mid range to a guy who just made 18 shots so far. Even if he is averaging 80%

Using that logic Avery Bradley should be a +90 mid range shooter as well
 
# 78 beast10 @ 03/27/12 07:51 PM
http://www.hoopdata.com/player.aspx?name=Gerald%20Green
Look at 16-23, it's 48% ... But either way 42% or 48% is good and deserves a +70 mid range shot.
 
# 79 Norris_Cole @ 03/27/12 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by beast10
10-15 feet = 26%, some of those shots probably qualify as mid range shots, therefore the 42% from the website I posted before, which shows exactly all the mid range shots.

Anyways as I said % isn't everything you can't give a guy with 18 mid range shoots an 80 or 90 . I don't think it's too hard to understand.

I'm fine with him being a 70 - 75 mid range shooter, and if he keeps shooting good who knows
 
# 80 beast10 @ 03/27/12 08:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norris_Cole
10-15 feet = 26%, some of those shots probably qualify as mid range shots, therefore the 42% from the website I posted before, which shows exactly all the mid range shots.

Anyways as I said % isn't everything you can't give a guy with 18 mid range shoots an 80 or 90 . I don't think it's too hard to understand.

I'm fine with him being a 70 - 75 mid range shooter, and if he keeps shooting good who knows
Okay, It doesn't really matter and by me saying 80-90 I was meaning the 2k wacked out formula, on my roster he is a 61.
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.