2K Sent us the overall ratings for every player in each team's starting five. Give the list a look through and let us know what you think! Did 2K rate your team right? Any surprises? Let us know!
Really, even though he shot 27 percent from 3s? Prez said more often than not. I'm not taking a shot at Rose and I know his range is improving, but he's not water from that distance. Not even close.
What does 16-23 ft have to do with his 3 point shot though? I'm well aware that his trey ball has been lacking since he came in the league. And you're taking elprez way too literally. Very very few people make their shots "more often than not". C'mon man. You're nitpicking hard.
What does 16-23 ft have to do with his 3 point shot though? I'm well aware that his trey ball has been lacking since he came in the league. And you're taking elprez way too literally. Very very few people make their shots "more often than not". C'mon man. You're nitpicking hard.
Do you know the distance for a 3-pointer? 22 feet from the corners and 23-9 from the top of the key. I said 18-20 is where his jumper is somewhat consistent. And I'm not nitpicking hard. Just quoting what he said. Guys are arguing about one or two points in overall ratings and I'm nitpicking hard?
So just cause Barbosa is the fastest on his team means his spead should be a 94.......that system is flawed man 2k does that ratings according to position and stats and i love it. NOt what fans think or what the guy has the potential to do but analyze players how good they are at there position Dirk at the power forward position is an 83 and i feel its spot on
Are you kidding me?! Varejao is severely underrated in this game. How can he not even be 85 at the very least. He has one of these best offensive post games to date and is a monster from 15-18 ft out.
Are you kidding me?! Varejao is severely underrated in this game. How can he not even be 85 at the very least. He has one of these best offensive post games to date and is a monster from 15-18 ft out.
If you watch the playoff finals fisher played back from rondo because rondo couldn't shoot when fisher played real d on rondo he got by him everytime rondo just wasn't finishing at the paint good..all his assist were on fisher and he dished them while in the paint, how'd he get there fisher was guarding him the reason he stopped attacking the paint was because LA was shutting it down making it difficult for him to score and costing possessions
That' because Rondo's like one of the quickest longest PGs in the NBA today dude. Lol, you'd be hard-pressed to find ANYONE that can stay in front of him. Like I said, I think Fisher's fine the way he's rated, and he isn't a great defender, but making the argument that he's bad because Rondo gets past him is silly
Do you know the distance for a 3-pointer? 22 feet from the corners and 23-9 from the top of the key. I said 18-20 is where his jumper is somewhat consistent. And I'm not nitpicking hard. Just quoting what he said. Guys are arguing about one or two points in overall ratings and I'm nitpicking hard?
Yes I know the distance. If I'm saying 16-23ft he's money, but as a 3 point shooter he's unproven then obviously I'm only meaning mid range. And with that quote yes, you're nitpicking. "More often than not" was just meant to be taken as he's damn good from that range. But we've been off-topic long enough.
Are you kidding me?! Varejao is severely underrated in this game. How can he not even be 85 at the very least. He has one of these best offensive post games to date and is a monster from 15-18 ft out.
And if you don't like 7 footers who play like they are 6'6 then obviously you haven't paid attention the future of the NBA buddy
GM's look for 7 footers who can strecth the floor.....where the hell have you been lately
The days of a 7'0 going Wilt Chamberlin have long gone.....you don't have very many back to basket big men anymore not sure what year your living in right now.
Also durability is a sign of toughness if it wasn't Brett Favre wouldn't be who is he and Johnny Unitas wouldn't have been who he was.....i'm done debating it
Right, because I'm talking only about Dirk's offensive game when I say he plays like he's 6'6". I notice you didn't notice I said he was a 50 something on D.
Can't play an incomplete game and be put up there with the best in the game, no matter how good the parts of Dirk's game he has are. You can knock down the J from mid to deep, but to give your team no kind of post presence at 7' cuz you're too busy taking fadeaways is pathetic.
End of story: As long as he's the best player on the Mavs, they'll continue fall short come the Finals.
Yeah, Durant should be a little bit higher, but until he gets his defensive game more on lock, that makes sense. Cuz you already know he's in the mid to high 90s on offense.
That' because Rondo's like one of the quickest longest PGs in the NBA today dude. Lol, you'd be hard-pressed to find ANYONE that can stay in front of him. Like I said, I think Fisher's fine the way he's rated, and he isn't a great defender, but making the argument that he's bad because Rondo gets past him is silly
The Lakers had to hide Fisher throughout the playoffs on defense. He was getting shredded by Westbrook in the first round so Kobe took him. He had problems staying with Deron Williams and of course Steve Nash and Rajon Rondo. Now granted, these are some of the best point guard in the league, but he looked really bad in most of these matchups and if not for Kobe's defense, the Lakers might have been bounced in the first round.
Maybe maybe not. Remember, ratings are only someones opinion. People can argue about ratings till their blue in the face, and still can't come to an agreement. As for rookie ratings, how can you be accurate or say this guy is better or worse than the other guy, when he hasn't played yet. The ratings don't bother me at all, as of now. Maybe ill change my mind after i actually play the game. Just a thought.
He didn't hardly do anything in the playoffs against the real contending teams like the Celtics and many more Varejao looked good in the playoffs like most players do on a team thats surroounds a all star player Varajao himself is not as good as you make him seem and you'll see it this year unless he steps up trust me.
Yeah, he did look pretty good in the playoffs. The cavs did a good job filling in key role players like Mo, Antawn, and LeBron around the all star himself, Varejao. You're right though, since he lost some key role players like Delonte and Shaq, teams will be able to focus their defense to contain Varejao's inner beast. We'll see how Varejao plays with all the pressure on him this time.
Yeah, he did look pretty good in the playoffs. The cavs did a good job filling in key role players like Mo, Antawn, and LeBron around the all star himself, Varejao. You're right though, since he lost some key role players like Delonte and Shaq, teams will be able to focus their defense to contain Varejao's inner beast. We'll see how Varejao plays with all the pressure on him this time.
ok wow i thought the player rating in 2k10 were bad but now there just getting outrageous, idk what anyone else thinks but it seems like every year the ratings get worst and worst. I mean how good do you have to be to get a star now. Some of the best players up there are only at 75 this is terrible even the rookies are better than half of the players up there. I'm guessing the ratings go like this you have to be at least 75 to be good a 80-90 to be a all star and 90+ to be invincible/future hall of famer. I mean dont get me wrong im still excited and cant wait for this game to come out but they can really start improving the ratings. I mean you can put obama in the game but you cant make someone like Brandon Jennings at least a 80. I hope somebody agrees with what im saying lol.