Home
NCAA Football 11 News Post


Credit to MadScientist06 and The Gaming Tailgate.

Here is a spreadsheet for those interested. Thanks godwhyme.

Game: NCAA Football 11Reader Score: 8/10 - Vote Now
Platform: iPhone / PS2 / PS3 / Xbox 360Votes for game: 83 - View All
NCAA Football 11 Videos
Member Comments
# 101 slingblade73 @ 06/17/10 07:59 PM
 
# 102 slingblade73 @ 06/17/10 08:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MWillard2
\

This was funny 2 years ago Bammer

for failing at life Bammer
It was malice...
 
# 103 BAMAJD @ 06/17/10 08:04 PM
That video is pretty irrelevant. Stop with the annoying ****, it's getting annoying with you making all Bama fans look insane/stupid.
 
# 104 BAMAJD @ 06/17/10 08:22 PM
We can only hope.
 
# 105 slingblade73 @ 06/17/10 08:32 PM
It was funny then and it is funny now. I have not said a word about the rosters.
 
# 106 slingblade73 @ 06/17/10 08:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAMAJD
We can only hope.
How about you mind your own business.
 
# 107 grismosw @ 06/17/10 08:49 PM
Typical generic ratings...Penn State offense is rated higher than their defense? What?!?!?
 
# 108 stoncold32 @ 06/17/10 08:52 PM
Bama's QB was near horrible last year. Unless he turned into Sam Bradford over the summer, I dont think they're deserving of a 99 offense
 
# 109 BAMAJD @ 06/17/10 08:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by slingblade73
How about you mind your own business.
Uh oh. & I think someone making a fanbase im a member of look dumb is my business.
 
# 110 BAMAJD @ 06/17/10 08:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoncold32
Bama's QB was near horrible last year. Unless he turned into Sam Bradford over the summer, I dont think they're deserving of a 99 offense
I guess you only watched a few games. but I do agree it shouldn't be 99.
 
# 111 slingblade73 @ 06/17/10 08:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAMAJD
Uh oh. & I think someone making a fanbase im a member of look dumb is my business.
Dude it is not my fault you have a complex.
 
# 112 BAMAJD @ 06/17/10 08:56 PM
Complex what? Unless that means something that I dont know of.
 
# 113 slingblade73 @ 06/17/10 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stoncold32
Bama's QB was near horrible last year. Unless he turned into Sam Bradford over the summer, I dont think they're deserving of a 99 offense
2009 197–325 60.6 2,508 17-4
 
# 114 slingblade73 @ 06/17/10 09:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAMAJD
Complex what? Unless that means something that I dont know of.
Point made, now back to football.
 
# 115 FedExPope @ 06/17/10 09:24 PM
aha, both my teams maxed out. I like how the prestiges are accurate. NC at 4 stars is good, as well as Cal at 3 for instance.

What is this Bama gang crap? One thread doesn't go by without a dispute about a player I swear...then stats are thrown around in an attempt to amaze everybody. >.>
 
# 116 DaltonT4 @ 06/17/10 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkam89
?
Kentucky should be 2 or 3 star.
You really thank that? A 2* program?
 
# 117 mkam89 @ 06/17/10 10:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaltonT4
You really thank that? A 2* program?
I mean I don't really follow UK football but they're a .500 program with 2 conference titles and continually finish near the bottom of their division. I don't know what would qualify them to be better than a 2*.
I don't have a problem with them being a 3*, but going back to my original statement, I don't see how they UK would even be considered a 4*.
 
# 118 cecondlife @ 06/17/10 10:13 PM
There is too much Balance. Too many teams with
OFF 87 Def 85
or
OFF 80 Def 79

Most schools like FSU last yr had a really good Off but D was horrible. (BTW I like FSU)
Where are the
OFF 88 Def 70
Or
OFF 80 Def 92

Teams that you cant stop but they can't stop you either or Teams that you just cant move the ball on but can't put points on the board.
 
# 119 BAMAJD @ 06/17/10 10:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by slingblade73
Point made, now back to football.
Well, I have never heard complex used in any way other than describing something.
 
# 120 GatorFan1963 @ 06/17/10 10:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gocards055
Kentucky should be a high 3, low 4 area. They have been to 4 bowls in a row and won 3 of em. And this is coming from a Louisville fan who hates Kentucky like no other.
Using bowl games as an argument nowadays isn't saying much considering many teams with .500 records go to bowls. The fact is that Kentucky has been nothing more than a barely above .500 team if you take their records over the past 4 seasons. And of those past 4 seasons they haven't finished above 4-4 in the SEC. So 3* is right where they need to be.
 


Post A Comment
Only OS members can post comments
Please login or register to post a comment.