MLB The Show 16 OSFM HYBRID V1 Roster Available Now

[WaitTilNextYear]

Quote: Originally Posted by AC

Just for future reference I wouldn't use ZiPS for anything, lol.

I don't know, ZiPS and Steamer tend to exhibit nearly the same predictive value. You can cross check one with the other and it's striking how similar they can be.

The reason I switched from ZiPS to Steamer about a year ago is because Dan Szymborski's developed something of a grating personality.

[AC]

Quote: Originally Posted by WaitTilNextYear

I don't know, ZiPS and Steamer tend to exhibit nearly the same predictive value. You can cross check one with the other and it's striking how similar they can be. The reason I switched from ZiPS to Steamer about a year ago is because Dan Szymborski's developed something of a grating personality.

On the aggregate yes but it isn't particularly hard to get a good aggregate result (I personally spent ~10 minutes bull****ting projections for an ISU and didn't get too far off ZiPS). The methodology is flawed. They don't regress peripherals properly in any way shape or form. It ends in guys with ridiculous true talent projections like 2 HR/9 (Scott Baker, Gavin Floyd) or BABIP (Odubel off the top of my head).

[WaitTilNextYear]

Quote: Originally Posted by AC

On the aggregate yes but it isn't particularly hard to get a good aggregate result (I personally spent ~10 minutes bull****ting projections for an ISU and didn't get too far off ZiPS). The methodology is flawed. They don't regress peripherals properly in any way shape or form. It ends in guys with ridiculous true talent projections like 2 HR/9 (Scott Baker, Gavin Floyd) or BABIP (Odubel off the top of my head).

Speaking of really wonky stuff like regression, we didn't even mention this about our roster I don't think, but I believe this roster is really the only one that regresses splits per The Book (that includes Sony as people who don't really do formal split regression). A lot of other re-rated rosters that I've seen read into ridiculously low numbers of ABs as if they hold absolute truth. I thought you could appreciate that.

[Willard76]

Quote: Originally Posted by cwhalx23

Willard can you create blue jays prospect jeremy gabryszwski in AA he having solid season.Willard did you create blue jays prospect shane dawson if not can you upload your version of him.

Dawson is in the set I believe and Gabryswski probably won't happen until I get a creation urge again.

[AC]

Quote: Originally Posted by WaitTilNextYear

Speaking of really wonky stuff like regression, we didn't even mention this about our roster I don't think, but I believe this roster is really the only one that regresses splits per The Book (that includes Sony as people who don't really do formal split regression). A lot of other re-rated rosters that I've seen read into ridiculously low numbers of ABs as if they hold absolute truth. I thought you could appreciate that.

Lol finally. People are always shocked

"2000 plate appearances?????????"

[cwhalx23]

Quote: Originally Posted by Willard76

Dawson is in the set I believe and Gabryswski probably won't happen until I get a creation urge again.

No i was asking if you created him blue jays prospect shane dawson that in the hybrid roster.

[Willard76]

Quote: Originally Posted by cwhalx23

No i was asking if you created him blue jays prospect shane dawson that in the hybrid roster.

Yes Dawson is mine

[Garrett59]

Quote: Originally Posted by cwhalx23

Willard can you create blue jays prospect jeremy gabryszwski in AA he having solid season.Willard did you create blue jays prospect shane dawson if not can you upload your version of him.

Jays look solid.