NBA 2K14 Player Ratings Released So Far

[Melbournelad]

Quote: Originally Posted by Sundown

In limited minutes off the bench on a terrible team. Per 36 isn't that useful a stat. 70-73 is fine for him as long as he excels in his proper areas. 2k also needs to take care of the massive overrating of limited minutes sixth men as starters. They say they're aware of the problem but Crawford continues to have an 80.

Detroit was 29-53, not 19-63. They were bad, but definately not terrible. Also 20 minutes is still a pretty significant amount. I'm not just looking at his per 36, but also WS/48, PER, TS%, and DWS. There's no denying he was very impressive. I'd say 76 is fair. I would even say that he's rookie season was just as impressive as Lilliard (who for all his good qualities as a player didn't play particularly good defense and shot a pretty poor percentage).

[DavidTheGreat20]

Quote: Originally Posted by Melbournelad

Mate after Drummond's historical rookie season (in terms of advanced stats), i'm expecting at least a 76-78 for him. And i think 2k's ratings are too high for most players. But Drummond's rookie season was that good.

Yeah I guess 76 would be fine, but I think it should be 73-74, because we didn't see him much because of his back injury. I'm a big-time Detroit fan (Especially of Drummond) but really it all depends on how the dynamic rosters work

Sent through Tapatalk.

[DBMcGee3]

Quote: Originally Posted by Wafflebrains

So Rose is rated higher than Westbrook, despite averagin 0ppg last year..... This reminds of how badly they overrated Roy before his first game last year. Guys with no knees and no heart (D Rose) are usually awful. Expect Rose to fall down to Earth (65-lower rating) when he's averaging 12ppg on 28% shooting 3 months into the season

Pure idiocy my friend. Enjoy your humble pie when he's ballin out again this year.

[Shosho]

I hope my boy Valanciunas gets a rating somewhere in the 70`s.

[Steve_OS]

2K Sports has released some more NBA 2K14 player ratings for the following players. We will update this post, if other player ratings are revealed today.

• James Harden (89)
• Harrison Barnes (76)
• Mason Plumlee (61)
• Rajon Rondo (90)
• Klay Thompson (76)
• Steven Adams (58)
• Steve Nash (81)
• Marc Gasol (83)
• Giannis Adetokunbo (60)
• Shane Larkin (71)
• Kobe Bryant (93)
• Glen Davis (75)
• Kentavious Caldwell-Pope (71)

Other player ratings previously released below.

• Russell Westbrook (91)
• Anthony Bennett (76)
• Pau Gasol (81)
• Evan Turner (76)
• Jared Dudley (73)
• Chris Johnson (66)
• Ben McLemore (72)
• Carmelo Anthony (92)
• Monta Ellis (82)
• Nerlens Noel (72)
• Peyton Siva (67)
• John Wall (85)
• Kevin Durant (94)
• LeBron James (99)
• Roy Hibbert (81)
• Victor Oladipo (76)
• Paul George (88)
• Cody Zeller (68)
• Brook Lopez (81)
• Derrick Rose (92)
• Jamal Crawford (80)
• Otto Porter (74)
• Steph Curry (88)
• Trey Burke (73)
• Mario Chalmers (76)
• C.J. McCollum (73)

Player ratings will fluctuate based off of performance via Dynamic Living Rosters. They will be completely dependent on real-life performances.

Dynamic Living Rosters will affect individual ratings (shot attributes, block, steal, rebound, etc.) daily based on performance.

[Gramps91]

woah didn't really expect Harden to be at 89. He does deserve it though.

[Sundown]

Quote: Originally Posted by Melbournelad

Detroit was 29-53, not 19-63. They were bad, but definately not terrible. Also 20 minutes is still a pretty significant amount. I'm not just looking at his per 36, but also WS/48, PER, TS%, and DWS. There's no denying he was very impressive. I'd say 76 is fair. I would even say that he's rookie season was just as impressive as Lilliard (who for all his good qualities as a player didn't play particularly good defense and shot a pretty poor percentage).

Detroit is still not a good team.

I'm not a big fan of PER or WS (more of a RAPM guy)-- I think both are terrible advance stats in fact. 20 minutes off the bench against other second units is not 36-40 minutes as a starter and I don't believe we should assume the same productivity just by doubling a player's minutes. That should be one of the last ways to justify how we rate a player. That kind of thinking is also how we end up with Jamal Crawford and JR Smth as 80 rated players capable of playing as good 40 min starters in game.

I think his advanced stats points to his potential but I don't think it's a conclusive way to rate rookies in limited minutes off the bench.

I wouldn't say Drummond's impact approaches that of Lillard's because of, again, minutes and role. It's about as big an apples vs oranges comparison as you can make. He has great upside but I wouldn't bestow him anything until he's earned it in extended minutes I'd just make sure he can do his job of blocking shots, being mobile, and rebounding.

[iki319]

why is james wearing under armour? isnt he with nike?