NCAA Football 12 Title Update #2 Details

[nonnel]

Quote: Originally Posted by jfsolo

I wouldn't buy the game. For me, improvements in gameplay, A.I. and mode functionality, even small improvements, are exponentially more important than a bug/glitch free game.

Well, fixing the bugs/glitches would be improvements in gameplay and A.I.

[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by DJ

Could they do something like Call of Duty and have 2 teams working on NCAA? That way, each team would be operating on a 2-year cycle but we would still get an annual release.

Then you're doubling your development costs or at least the cost in man hours. I doubt EA is up for that.

[phantomremix]

I am chill with everything, very happy that they got a lot of things i was just going to learn to live with fixed. Question, does anyone else see starting your dynasty in a lower conference and ending the season ranked in the top 15 but still only going to the Go Daddy.com bowl in your first season as a glitch or just something that you deal with knowing it gets better after season 1?

[gamemaster-2005]

Fixed an issue with Program Stability where the grade would drop from A+ to D+ in one season.


So they fixed the issue were when a coordinator tv games aren't counted?

[northface28]

Quote: Originally Posted by Kingfish

Only way it would work is if they go subscription based OR they could charge $119.90 so the 'suits' wouldn't think they were loosing money. Its all about the cash.

Fine by me, id pay $119.99 for a fully functional game. No bugs or glitches? Hell, id pay more.

[leo2k2ndc]

HuH... The three things that annoy me the worst didn't even get mentioned.... AWWWW Shucks

[Tengo Juego]

This patch is going to come out at the worst possible time: When Madden comes out, and I don't care anymore.

Also disappointed to see no mention of them removing the blur effect in the menus.

[SECElit3]

Quote: Originally Posted by northface28

Fine by me, id pay $119.99 for a fully functional game. No bugs or glitches? Hell, id pay more.

If you think charging us more for the game would get us a better product, you are living in candy land bud. We would get the same product, at the same time, in the same shape. The issues we see with this game aren't going to be resolved by throwing money at them. There is a thought process here that needs changing. Someone has to come to a realization of the importance of thoroughly testing a product and making sure that the game doesn't get out the door with these types of problems no matter what.