NCAA Football 12 Blog - Dynasty Tuning and More Details on Coaching Carousel

Quote: Originally Posted by dan_457

So what? It's all relative. So long as it stays consistent, I don't care. Lower ratings would only be for pure cosmetic reasons anyway. I'll take that over a cluster of B- rated teams like what happened last year.

Now were have a bunch of A+ teams like in 09

[J-Unit40]

Quote: Originally Posted by MattUMD224

Nothing new

Nothing new? What are you talking about Willis?

I like a lot of what I am hearing. Specifically the CPU recruiting logic, sim running stats and incoming prospects.

[arobbi3]

Quote: Originally Posted by dan_457

So what? It's all relative. So long as it stays consistent, I don't care. Lower ratings would only be for pure cosmetic reasons anyway. I'll take that over a cluster of B- rated teams like what happened last year.

I agree that the default rosters are overrated, but you are correct. As long as it stays consistent throughout the dynasty it will not matter.

[JalenTigh]

Not a word about tuning the generated recruits sizes and tendencies. That's been such a major complaint I can not believe they would not have mentioned it in that blog if they had fixed it. All the tuning to how schools recruit to their schemes will not matter one bit if they still recruit 6'7 185lbs run stopping DE's for the 3-4 or 165lbs power backs for a power running game.

[moylan1234]

How do you overrate fictional characters anyway?

[arobbi3]

Quote: Originally Posted by MattUMD224

Now were have a bunch of A+ teams like in 09

The new recruiting system should prevent too many A+ teams... Hopefully.

[schumj]

I love a lot of this stuff (sim stats, recruiting to style, etc). One question I still have is it mentioned in sim stats HB, backup HB and QB rushing stats, but what about triple option teams. Will they actually give it to their B-Back or FB?In these offenses usually the leading rusher (attempts) is at this position and isn't a typical FB (Alexander Teich - Navy, Allen and Dwyer when they were at G-Tech, Jarred Hassin - Army. I still hate the fact I have to put large blocking ratings to these guys to get them to be good.

[Microsoft_Works]

Quote: Originally Posted by JalenTigh

Not a word about tuning the generated recruits sizes and tendencies. That's been such a major complaint I can not believe they would not have mentioned it in that blog if they had fixed it. All the tuning to how schools recruit to their schemes will not matter one bit if they still recruit 6'7 185lbs run stopping DE's for the 3-4 or 165lbs power backs for a power running game.

Still no word on weight mattering though, so moot point.