More Links

dan_457 · 07-29-2010, 01:03 AM

It doesn't, I left mine at vasity, and it's the same as AA and Heisman, only it's easier for the player.

cincy sean · 07-29-2010, 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beauforsure


	Has anyone tried lowering there RECRUITING level ? Maybe ths gives the lower schools more leverage in signing recruits at 3 and 4 star levels...??

hmmmmm maybe but it won't fix the depth chart problem and ratings, but I like the ideas

cincy sean · 07-29-2010, 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MacCLovin


	What's your twitter so i can follow?

cincy2cbus

homelessskittle · 07-29-2010, 01:13 AM

there is no reason a patch should be needed

doesn't ea test these games you know actually play them BEFORE they sell them

i mean wtf

the cb's running the wr's routes wouldnt they see that before they sell the game if they test it

and this progression stuff this is just retarted

and everyone goes oh well they will fix it with the patch that is such bull they shouldnt need to fix it with a patch because they should have tested it BEFORE

maybe common sense is just too much to ask for....?

ps **** u

beauforsure · 07-29-2010, 01:39 AM

OK OK... MAJOR ISSUE ... I HAVE A QB placed on my depth chart as the 4th option at HB !!! then...at FB i have backing my starter is a TE who is a backup TE and a RT ?? lol...Then at WR , guess whos my 4th WR ? lol...that same dam QB who was 4th at HB !!! TE i have both TE's but a MLB playing 3rd on depth...lol...

WOW...This one takes the cake...I have a ROLB play as my 3rd CB !!! lol...

Now we can see why players are acting stupid bcause there outta position... Also this affects backups be able to come in and gain PROGRESSION points because they never see the field....

anterrabae33 · 07-29-2010, 01:43 AM

Ok, I'm new here and it's impossible to read this whole thread to see if this idea has come up but... this is my theory on why it's happening.

Ok, so I started dynasty with Rutgers and have made a couple recruits (of which I did not all commit )

Anyway, the idea of recruiting well comes to the fact that you should recruit players that have an interest in your school. This coupled with needs should be the basis for recruiting. Of course, there are guys you HAVE to try and go after. The problem I'm seeing is maybe the CPU controlled schools are only going after recruits with interest in them. Hell, I've done recruiting and without noticing have stocked up on certain positions while neglecting others.

From what my mind can boil up, the problems are
1)The CPU only goes after interested recruits (some of which are poached by user controlled schools and other CPU schools.) This can lead to only a certain amount of recruits for a large amount of teams.

2) The CPU doesn't properly know how to redshirt. (I somewhat neglect the process too and it leads to a large amount of players at certain positions leaving)

3) The kicking flaw actually seems very simple to me. The last year I recruited, there were only about 6 or 7 punters ( and about the same amount of kickers maybe a little more). None have ever been over 3 stars. Ok, so say all those guys commit to schools. Off the bat, even those guys aren't good. And that only solves the problem for about 10 schools out of a crap lot more. Those schools now have to use walk on players who SUCK. I had a walk on punter who started at 44. This theory could be added to other positions but most of the positions have at least 25+ players at worst.

4) CPU schools recruit too many athletes and put them in the positions they need regardless of how bad they are. That's self explanatory.

5) Once a team is low on a position, like others have said, they put players from different positions in to back them up.

dan_457 · 07-29-2010, 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beauforsure


	OK OK... MAJOR ISSUE ... I HAVE A QB placed on my depth chart as the 4th option at HB !!! then...at FB i have backing my starter is a TE who is a backup TE and a RT ?? lol...Then at WR , guess whos my 4th WR ? lol...that same dam QB who was 4th at HB !!! TE i have both TE's but a MLB playing 3rd on depth...lol... WOW...This one takes the cake...I have a ROLB play as my 3rd CB !!! lol... Now we can see why players are acting stupid bcause there outta position... Also this affects backups be able to come in and gain PROGRESSION points because they never see the field....

This is a Major problem, luckily we can change our depth charts, but the CPU can't. This is a Massive issue, potentially one of the biggest problems there is.

beauforsure · 07-29-2010, 02:04 AM

Air Force has a WR as there backup KICKER !! lol...OchoCinco anyone ?

07-29-2010, 01:03 AM	#217
dan_457 MVP OVR: 26 Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Myrtle Beach, SC	Re: NCAA's Broken Dynasty Mode -- Another reason we need a revolution It doesn't, I left mine at vasity, and it's the same as AA and Heisman, only it's easier for the player. __________________ -Ohio State- -Cleveland Browns- -Cleveland Cavaliers-

07-29-2010, 01:13 AM	#220
homelessskittle Banned OVR: 1 Join Date: Jul 2010	Re: NCAA's Broken Dynasty Mode -- Another reason we need a revolution there is no reason a patch should be needed doesn't ea test these games you know actually play them BEFORE they sell them i mean wtf the cb's running the wr's routes wouldnt they see that before they sell the game if they test it and this progression stuff this is just retarted and everyone goes oh well they will fix it with the patch that is such bull they shouldnt need to fix it with a patch because they should have tested it BEFORE maybe common sense is just too much to ask for....? ps **** u

07-29-2010, 01:39 AM	#221
beauforsure Banned OVR: 1 Join Date: Oct 2009	Re: NCAA's Broken Dynasty Mode -- Another reason we need a revolution OK OK... MAJOR ISSUE ... I HAVE A QB placed on my depth chart as the 4th option at HB !!! then...at FB i have backing my starter is a TE who is a backup TE and a RT ?? lol...Then at WR , guess whos my 4th WR ? lol...that same dam QB who was 4th at HB !!! TE i have both TE's but a MLB playing 3rd on depth...lol... WOW...This one takes the cake...I have a ROLB play as my 3rd CB !!! lol... Now we can see why players are acting stupid bcause there outta position... Also this affects backups be able to come in and gain PROGRESSION points because they never see the field.... Last edited by beauforsure; 07-29-2010 at 01:41 AM.

07-29-2010, 01:43 AM	#222
anterrabae33 Rookie OVR: 0 Join Date: Oct 2008	Re: NCAA's Broken Dynasty Mode -- Another reason we need a revolution Ok, I'm new here and it's impossible to read this whole thread to see if this idea has come up but... this is my theory on why it's happening. Ok, so I started dynasty with Rutgers and have made a couple recruits (of which I did not all commit ) Anyway, the idea of recruiting well comes to the fact that you should recruit players that have an interest in your school. This coupled with needs should be the basis for recruiting. Of course, there are guys you HAVE to try and go after. The problem I'm seeing is maybe the CPU controlled schools are only going after recruits with interest in them. Hell, I've done recruiting and without noticing have stocked up on certain positions while neglecting others. From what my mind can boil up, the problems are 1)The CPU only goes after interested recruits (some of which are poached by user controlled schools and other CPU schools.) This can lead to only a certain amount of recruits for a large amount of teams. 2) The CPU doesn't properly know how to redshirt. (I somewhat neglect the process too and it leads to a large amount of players at certain positions leaving) 3) The kicking flaw actually seems very simple to me. The last year I recruited, there were only about 6 or 7 punters ( and about the same amount of kickers maybe a little more). None have ever been over 3 stars. Ok, so say all those guys commit to schools. Off the bat, even those guys aren't good. And that only solves the problem for about 10 schools out of a crap lot more. Those schools now have to use walk on players who SUCK. I had a walk on punter who started at 44. This theory could be added to other positions but most of the positions have at least 25+ players at worst. 4) CPU schools recruit too many athletes and put them in the positions they need regardless of how bad they are. That's self explanatory. 5) Once a team is low on a position, like others have said, they put players from different positions in to back them up.

07-29-2010, 02:04 AM	#224
beauforsure Banned OVR: 1 Join Date: Oct 2009	Re: NCAA's Broken Dynasty Mode -- Another reason we need a revolution Air Force has a WR as there backup KICKER !! lol...OchoCinco anyone ?

	New OS Forums Are Coming on May 1
	The Best Sports Gaming Year of All-Time
	Arcade Sports Games Need a Revival

More Links

NCAA's Broken Dynasty Mode -- Another reason we need a revolution